(Dubai, Melbourne, Paris, Beijing, Brazil and it goes on and on), there should have been more careful consideration of what they were using. They went for the cheap stuff instead of the fire proof, mineral wool cladding. Mostly, they went for appearances instead of doing something to improve the safety of the building, namely a sprinkler system in hallways and stairwells and an adequate smoke abatement system in the one stairwell.
This is something that never should have happened. It's a matter of skewed priorities, corner cutting, and disregard for the concerns of the tenants, which were well known to the management company. It's also a matter of a manufacturer who knew the product was rated only for 4 story buildings, but was all too willing to sell it to clad residential towers around the world.
Floors in the building have needed to be propped up so they don't collapse. Victim recovery teams are using trowels and sieves to try to find bone fragments and teeth that might contain enough uncooked DNA for identification.
People should end up in prison for this. And there are many other buildings in the UK, high rises, with that cladding.