Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 07:45 AM Mar 2014

Crimea Sanctions: Europe Should Impose Stiffer Penalties

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/commentary-time-for-more-painful-eu-sanctions-on-russia-a-959342.html



Germany has said it wants to take on greater responsibility in foreign policy -- and the Crimea crisis offers a golden opportunity to do so. Berlin should impose tougher penalties against Russia, even if it would hurt the German economy.

Crimea Sanctions: Europe Should Impose Stiffer Penalties
A Commentary by David Böcking
March 18, 2014 – 12:25 PM

"Freedom isn't free." This bit of wisdom is one that American patriots are fond of slapping onto their back bumpers. But there is something to it. The fight for political convictions always comes with a price. Yet it appears to be one that German managers and corporate leaders are uninterested in paying.

E.on head Johannes Teyssen warned against endangering "very responsible policies toward the East" in an interview with SPIEGELthis week. Rainer Lindner, head of Germany's Committee on Eastern European Economic Relations, fears that "sanctions will certainly trigger counter-sanctions" -- as if effective penalties could ever be free of charge.

The concerns expressed by Germany's business community are understandable. But the government in Berlin should ignore them just the same. In addition to the travel bans and frozen accounts already imposed by the EU -- punitive actions that are essentially symbolic in nature -- Europe should also levy more significant economic sanctions against Russia. It is a question of credibility. Not doing so is tantamount to Germany and the EU saying: "You know what Mr. Putin? The Crimea isn't actually that important to us after all."

Led by German President Joachim Gauck, Berlin only recently demanded that the country take on more responsibility in the world. Chancellor Angela Merkel made clear early on that military intervention in the Crimea crisis isn't an option. That makes sense. But what other alternatives could Europe pursue?
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Crimea Sanctions: Europe Should Impose Stiffer Penalties (Original Post) unhappycamper Mar 2014 OP
On the subject of EU sanctions dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #1
well they could loudly demand that Russia shut off its energy pipelines. Warren Stupidity Mar 2014 #2
"Freedom isn't Free" is a trite cliche. Calling it a "bit of wisdom" is too. bemildred Mar 2014 #3

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
1. On the subject of EU sanctions
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 08:03 AM
Mar 2014

Germany doesn't speak on behalf of the EU - only on its own behalf. So Germany , know your place and not so much of the Europe.

As is the same with the consideration of a country applying for member status whereby the agreement of ALL member states is necessary , in the case of current sanctions which were watered down for 120 top 20 individuals, that was due to Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece and Cyprus only being prepared to accept that lower figure. The dissent of only one of those countries would've been sufficient to achieve that result.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
3. "Freedom isn't Free" is a trite cliche. Calling it a "bit of wisdom" is too.
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 08:13 AM
Mar 2014

"Let's cut off our nose to spite our face" works just as well.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»Crimea Sanctions: Europe ...