Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mosby

(16,319 posts)
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:36 AM Apr 2016

The Arab-Israeli conflict: Time to move on

As a result of the creation of the State of Israel in 1948, roughly 800,000 Jews were expelled from various Arab countries in which they had been living for generations.

Consequently, they were forced, like millions of other refugees throughout the 20th century, to resettle elsewhere. Although certainly not an easy task, eventually both the initial refugees and their descendants were able to let go of the past and move on with their lives.

Unlike the Jewish refugees from Arab countries, the story of the roughly 500,000 Arab refugees created by Israel’s War of Independence has been vastly different. Rather than being encouraged to resettle elsewhere, they were turned into permanent refugees to be used as a political tool against Israel. For this purpose, a special UN agency, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), was created in 1950 for the sole intent of maintaining, as opposed to resettling, the original refugees.

Even today, nearly seventy years later, UNRWA continues with this policy unabashedly. As they boldly state on their site “We are committed to fostering the human development of Palestine refugees by helping them to acquire knowledge and skills, lead long and healthy lives, achieve decent standards of living and enjoy human rights to the fullest possible extent.” Noticeably absent from this list is any attempt to help the refugees restart their lives in another place.

The exact opposite is the case for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), an agency that was also established in 1950 and which deals with every other other refugee population in the world. According to its site, "The agency is mandated to lead and co-ordinate international action to protect refugees and resolve refugee problems worldwide.”

-snip-

Lots more at:

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4786722,00.html


It's time to face reality, the Palestinians have been used as pawns against the Jews since before WWII, they have been fed a diet of lies, have been inculcated since birth to embrace violence as THE way to realize their goals, have done no nation building outside of a security entity, their government has devolved into a (multiple party) dictatorship, and they already number more than the entire population of Israel thanks to the perma-refugee status granted to them. The whole situation is ridiculous and without precedence, I think the colonialist countries Britain and France who illegally occupied the ME for so long should pony up some money for reparations and facilitating relocation.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Arab-Israeli conflict: Time to move on (Original Post) Mosby Apr 2016 OP
Why can't the Palestinian refugees be resettled in their ancestral homeland where they want to live? Little Tich Apr 2016 #1
Because the Saudis don't want to take them back. Fozzledick Apr 2016 #2
I have no problems with Jews living in the West Bank as equals. Little Tich Apr 2016 #3

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
1. Why can't the Palestinian refugees be resettled in their ancestral homeland where they want to live?
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 10:44 PM
Apr 2016

I can't see why any person of any ethnicity should be prevented from living in the land where their ancestors come from - Jews, Palestinians, Armenians, Circassians, Kosovo-Albanians, Chagossians and all others should have that right, IMHO. No exceptions.

Fozzledick

(3,860 posts)
2. Because the Saudis don't want to take them back.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:54 PM
Apr 2016

Are you really saying now you approve of Jews living in Judea? Seems like you've spent all your time here arguing against that. I can't help wondering if you just haven't thought things through.

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
3. I have no problems with Jews living in the West Bank as equals.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:54 AM
Apr 2016

That would of course make a two-state solution impossible, but wasn't that the point of building the settlements anyway?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»The Arab-Israeli conflict...