Why is the Palestinian reconciliation driving Israel into a panic?
Israel is an existing fact, and the State of Israel will continue to exist. But Hamas will only consider recognizing Israel when an independent Palestinian state is established
As a Palestinian, I want a state within the 67 borders, said Hamas political leader Khaled Meshal in an interview with Reuters in January 2007. It was six months before Hamas armed takeover of Gaza, which created the deepest, most violent rupture ever of Palestinian leadership.
Nobody in Israel took Meshals statement seriously, as nobody took seriously a document released by Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyehs adviser a month earlier. The document proposed a five-year hudna, or "ceasefire," to
enable Israel and the Palestinians to advance toward setting up two states for two peoples.
<snip>
Israels automatic reaction is not surprising. It prefers to negotiate ad hoc with organizations, even terror groups like Hamas and Hezbollah, on specific issues, like releasing prisoners or a cease fire. It does not conduct diplomatic talks with groups that dont recognize it. But the Palestinian Authority also doesnt recognize Israel as a Jewish state, yet Israel conducts peace talks with it all the same.
Another contradiction in Israels position pertains to Hamas. Israel objected to talks with Hamas because it was a terror group and served as an Iranian agent in the region. But when Hamas cut itself off from Iran and moved to join the PLO, Israel used it as an excuse to stop the peace negotiations with the Palestinians and blame Abbas for the talks collapse.
Israel is expected to cut all ties with the Palestinian unity government that is due to be formed in five weeks and even impose sanctions on it. Washington is also expected to turn a cold shoulder to the new government. At this stage, the European Union and Arab states, most of which support the reconciliation, will have to make a decision. Will they allow some 5 million Palestinians to be left with no services, no funds and no hope of a political horizon, or will they take this opportunity to shape reality in the Middle East, rather than merely observe from the side?
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.587285