Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumThis Jew can’t support Israel
http://mondoweiss.net/2014/07/cant-support-israel.htmlGrowing up in my Jewish family, it was a given that Jews supported civil rights, opposed the Vietnam War and believed in education, science and progress. This didnt make it easy to be a teenager in a small working-class town in central Pennsylvania, an area not known for either diversity or liberal views at the time. Israel was a distant place where survivors of the brutal European Holocaust struggled to live in peace, occasionally beset by terrorists and attacking armies from the surrounding countries.
---
The more I learned about Israel, the more I realized that what I had been taught growing up was a lie. But I also discovered that, even in the progressive movements in the 1980s, the issue was contentious. I spent my twenties working at the Guardian radical newsweekly, a paper that staunchly supported Palestinian rights; periodically we would lose a significant segment of our readership due to our alleged anti-Semitism, and we would receive occasional bomb threats from the Jewish Defense League, a nasty organization whose members would physically attack participants in pro-Palestine demonstrations.
This kneejerk labeling of critics of Israel as anti-Semitic (or in my case, a self-hating Jew) made me even more firm in my conviction that it was the special obligation of U.S. Jews to stand against racism in Israel. As more of us demanded equal rights for all in Israel/Palestine, it became harder to smear supporters of Palestine as anti-Semitic. The needle on this debate has moved considerably since the 1980s, when just to say the word Palestinian was considered inflammatory, even in some left circles.
libodem
(19,288 posts)Had an interesting discussion about Yiddish speakers vs speakers of Hebrew. Even in Zion, they have their divisions.
Oh Father/Mother God, Thy will be done.
your mostly atheist
daughter
ann---
(1,933 posts)There are many loved ones in my family who are Jewish and they are TOTALLY against Netanyahoo and his barbaric ways. Obama's silence is deafening. His unspoken support for Israel's rampages is sickening to me.
2banon
(7,321 posts)My impression is that he has deep, deep loathing for Netanyahu, based on my "reading" of Obama's unspoken reactions to Bebe's visit's to the White House). Bebe is a straight up racist and proud of it. I believe Obama has no problem reading that.
I realize his scripted comments "in support" of Israeli policies which he does voice from the dais to the media, seems to lend credence to your comments, however, I intuit that he's toting the party line that the PTB firmly enforces.
On this policy and many others, I strongly suspect Obama's under serious threat of life (or other serious action) to his family and possibly to himself if he steps out of line. I only wish that he could drum up enough courage to just say so, and say it out loud to the world, in clear and no uncertain terms.
shira
(30,109 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)No where in my post do I say anything of the kind. Your reaction is insane.
shira
(30,109 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)matter. Additionally, i say in regards to policies in general (not just this issue) "many others" I intuit that Obama has acted under some level of personal threat. That doesn't necessarily stipulate assassination. It could but that's NOT the only means to threaten harm.
I INTUIT this to be the case in certain policy matters, such as this one, because Obama is no loyal friend to bloodthirsty racists like Netanyahu. And I truly do not believe that Obama actually in his heart supports any country perpetrating racists policies including warfare on another people.
So why then would he declare unwavering support for Israel and they're policies if he wasn't acting under personal threat of harm? What other explanation do you offer, ponder if someone acted in opposition to anything of what they personally believed, if not under threat?
shira
(30,109 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)unblock
(52,208 posts)i comes here for teh grate debate!
shira
(30,109 posts)You demand that your government (Israel) caves in to all Hamas demands?
What do you do?
wellst0nev0ter
(7,509 posts)Indefensible.
shira
(30,109 posts)Or are you pretending Hamas will react peacefully to Israel's gesture?
wellst0nev0ter
(7,509 posts)Indefensible.
gopiscrap
(23,758 posts)Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)A great org I belong to that is for Palestinian justice. http://jewishvoiceforpeace.org/
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Thanks for referencing JVP!
Duppers
(28,120 posts)They recently emailed this, encouraging people to join:
https://www.facebook.com/peacenotrevenge?refsrc=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fpeacenotrevenge&_rdr
shira
(30,109 posts)JVP can't (1) be against an unconditional ceasefire for this conflict with so many dying, (2) refuse to hold Hamas accountable for what it does against its own people, and then claim to be pro-Palestinian.
Simply.Not.Possible
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)rickyhall
(4,889 posts)shira
(30,109 posts)What would you suggest Israel do?
genwah
(574 posts)be the good guys!
KauaiK
(544 posts)I would think they would be more cognizant of their actions. I also risk being called anti-Semitic, but the horrors of what is being done in Gaza are beyond justification.
shira
(30,109 posts)KauaiK
(544 posts)however, if you live by the sword, you die by the sword. The current bombing of Gaza just creates more hate militants and suicide bombers. I am old enough to remember ALL of the wars between the Arab nations and Israel. The state of Israel (like all of the middle east) was created by other countries after war.
ellenrr
(3,864 posts)for no reason other than they are Arab.
which is reminescent of Nazis beating up Jews.
and run thru the streets shouting "death to the Arabs".
One a-hole even said "Put the Arabs in concentration camps."
I think it's like - on an individual basis - a person who is abused - may become an abuser or may become a very compassionate person.
and let's not forget that there are Jews who are Holocaust survivors who oppose Israeli politics.--
who say, Never Again - to anyone.
PCIntern
(25,541 posts)about 10 million or so...conservatively....but who is counting?
Oh.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)PCIntern
(25,541 posts)Don't worry, Israel will be around for a very long time as will I. And we both have something in common...
We never ever forget....
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)I hope that you never ever forget how Israel has just butchered a bunch of civilians while excuses are made and the victims blamed.
2banon
(7,321 posts)Apart from the steaming pile of racism your comment conveys, it's still astonishing to see and hear people who were persecuted turn around and behave with a striking similarity to the brown shirts with a striking similarity of blind hatred.
PCIntern
(25,541 posts)It often comes up in discussion.
King_David
(14,851 posts)My guess
progressoid
(49,988 posts)Oh.
PCIntern
(25,541 posts)many people everywhere stood by quietly. Some cheered. FDR knew what was ongoing...didn't take many refugees, didn't bomb the rail lines into the death camps. I often wonder where many would stand today on these issues.
shira
(30,109 posts)We must pretend they're peaceful and that they only want 2 states, to live side-by-side in peace. Only the Nazis hated Jews enough to kill them. Since then, there's no antisemitism. It simply doesn't exist anymore so Israel can't use it as an excuse.
Easier to bash Israel for being irrational and evil against poor Hamas when Hamas is portrayed as innocent & misunderstood.
IMO, denying what Hamas truly is when it comes to their stance on Jews isn't too far off from Holocaust denial.
PCIntern
(25,541 posts)Can you imagine if the remnants of one of the Native American tribes declared war on those who inhabit the land they once lived upon and started shooting flaming arrows into people's homes? These people would be calling for the National Guard and the regular Army with fixed bayonets.
progressoid
(49,988 posts)Nor do I believe any of those things.
I support neither Hamas nor Israel. I'm having a hard time finding the "good guys" in this war.
progressoid
(49,988 posts)Oh, wait, he's been dead for 70 years. So his opinion is applicable to today's war how?
locks
(2,012 posts)to tell the good guys from the bad, terrorists from insurgents, invaders from defenders, rebels from separatists, racists from realists, innocents from soldiers, children from shields, gun-sellers from gun- buyers, peaceniks from warmongers, military aircraft from commercial airlines, the faithful from satanists, refugees from bomb-carriers, the Onion from reality news..
As children we were carefully taught "all are precious in His sight" but we knew some were more precious than others according to how they looked or what they wore, and our pennies were going to the missionaries who would help them to be more like us, the good guys in white hats.
Perhaps we should have the media change hats, hairdos, or uniforms according to which side they're supporting. Or add disclaimers to every report such as: 300 people were killed today but we know they were told to take refuge and they didn't. Or: 300 were killed today but the killers were using guns made in another country. Or: 300 were killed today but we know we can't trust the numbers from that side. Oh, wait, they already say that.
So maybe we could paint "This drone is carrying bombs Made in _____ so you need to find a place to hide" in large letters and in 32 languages, and have the robots wear colors and flags just like in futbol so we'd know who to cheer for while we're watching the killing on TV.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Peacetrain
(22,875 posts)You can be true to your faith.. and not support governmental policies
==========================================================
Iran is a government.. Islam is a faith.
You can be true to your faith.. and not support governmental policies.
================================================================
The United States is a goverment.. Christianity (the most prevalence faith in the US is a faith)
You can be true to your faith.. and not support governmental policies
================================================================
and so forth and so on for all religious arenas in any country.
aranthus
(3,385 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)stand up for those who have no voice; no matter how far the national party has swung to the right.
To the Reagan Democrats the OP may appear radical, but do I need to add say anything else?
shira
(30,109 posts)
who have no voice. You guys refuse to acknowledge what Hamas is currently doing to Gazans.
Prove me wrong. What is Hamas currently doing to Palestinians who have no voice & need outsiders to help?
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Nobody that I know on DU cheers for Hamas. Nobody. Neither do I.
But I will not cheer for Israel as it bombs civilians. Kills babies.
My sense is that a lot of DUers feel the same way: putting you on the wrong side of the argument and in the dark.
You are always trying in vain to blow smoke up people's ass here and divert attention from the bad that Israel does.
Everybody can see through to your gimmicky nonsense.
shira
(30,109 posts)Response to shira (Reply #48)
Post removed
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Response to Post removed (Reply #50)
Post removed
shira
(30,109 posts)That's much better than supporting a liberal democracy.
She posts on a forum that's pro-Hamas and advocates Israel's destruction. The only way her 1-state nightmare will happen is via war. So like WOW, for someone speaking "as a Jew" I can't imagine why > 99% of all the world's Jews would disagree with her.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)each day.
All I can say to that is keep it going shira. You are your own worst enemy.
shira
(30,109 posts)
and in the Senate.
Yours?
Meh.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)More democrats think Israel is using too much force rather that too little or just enough. They did a poll. Would you like me to link it for you?
And can i please get a link on the 99% of Jews worldwide agreeing with you? Thanks in advance, i'd like to see the stats for myself.
shira
(30,109 posts)No Democrats are doing that. You do realize the difference b/w criticizing vs. hateful demonizing?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Hamas? The Israeli gov demonizes palestinians all the time. It goes both ways. But right now Hamas IS NOT pulling the triggers or pushing the buttons that kill hundreds of civilians.
Killing over a hundred children to get to a missile is not the way to handle terrorism. More fighters are created with each dead civilian. Whole families are being wiped out. Israeli politicians are calling for the deaths of the mothers of palestinian fighters, the rhetoric coming from Netanyahu is sounding more and more like the rhetoric coming from Hamas. The Israeli government is very right wing and they SOUND very right wing. I never support right-wingers who bomb hospitals to get to a missile that might not even be there. I never support grown military fighters who use missiles against children playing soccer on the beach.
Shira, you need to take a step back and judge the situation by what you would do. Would you kill civilians to get to a bad guy? No Shira, you would not. Neither would i. Netanyahu is doing it as i type this and he is arrogant and nasty about it. He feels nothing fir the innocent victims but distain. Never become the bad guy. The IDF should be BETTER than HAMAS and should kill Less civilians than Hamas. They are not. They are doing the bulk of the killing and the bulk of the dead are innocent. It needs to stop and Israel needs a new PM and Knesset.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Get used to it.
shira
(30,109 posts)archaic56
(53 posts)excellent article.. The lady directly below postulated that our Prez, bless his heart, has been or may be under threat. actually he has had more death threats than any other president. Heck didn't you hear Coulter call for death squads?
The other interesting bit is your thread just made me realize how a certain social network is being used for a bit of social engineering (see Century of Self I posted in another thread)
Because at this so call open place.. the meme of the misquote about the "Master Race" is running wild all over there.Now I know I must go back and take it down .Bad on me for not researching..
IT seems to me that there are people for peace.. and some groups or group of whomever , who have a vested interest in fostering conflict.. because..why else make a meme like that but to foster violence..
what I keep being drawn back to is Eisenhower's warning about our MILItary Industrial Complex.. It could be as simple as those in the business..don't want conflict to stop because they lose money.. OR something far nastier..
who knows.. Just throwing the gray matter out there to see what intelligent discourse come out of it.
increasingly.. I see that "WHY" is the word we all may choose to use more often in the future.. who gains by the conflict is the question I ask?