Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If the Government has a weather machine, Isaac will turn and hit Tampa. (Original Post) Motown_Johnny Aug 2012 OP
If the government had a weather machine we would most likely be all dead LARED Aug 2012 #1
No, actually I don't. Motown_Johnny Aug 2012 #2
It actually proves not a thing LARED Aug 2012 #3
You are right, it doesn't Motown_Johnny Aug 2012 #4
The only thing that can be concluded is LARED Aug 2012 #5
No, they made it MISS Tampa, so we'd think they didn't have one jberryhill Sep 2012 #6
 

LARED

(11,735 posts)
1. If the government had a weather machine we would most likely be all dead
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 08:43 AM
Aug 2012

because they would have screwed up the earths atmosphere to the point of global disaster.

The government can't even figure out how much money it spends, and you think it can control the weather, Hah.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
2. No, actually I don't.
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 10:04 AM
Aug 2012

So when Isaac doesn't turn and hit Tampa that should prove this conspiracy theory is wrong.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
4. You are right, it doesn't
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 12:36 PM
Aug 2012

but if we assume President Obama would order the weather machine be used to disrupt the convention then we can come to the conclusion that either the storm will make landfall near Tampa or there is no machine.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
6. No, they made it MISS Tampa, so we'd think they didn't have one
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 11:32 PM
Sep 2012

The true test of any good CT is its ability to accommodate any set of facts.

This is why the collapse of WTC1 and WTC2 looked JUST LIKE a controlled demolition, except for the things that they did not make it not look like a controlled demolition. Because if it did, then we'd think it was a controlled demolition. So it was a controlled demolition carried out in a way that didn't look like one.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»If the Government has a w...