Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 08:46 AM Aug 2012

Marriage for all

http://www.presseurop.eu/en/content/editorial/2538591-marriage-all

Do you live in Belgium, Denmark, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain or Sweden? Don't worry about it then. In these countries, same-sex couples can marry. However, in other European countries, the issue comes up regularly in political and social debates, particularly before and after elections.

In France, for example, the socialist Francois Hollande pledged during the presidential campaign to “extend marriage and adoption rights to homosexual couples.” Once elected, he announced legislation on the matter “for the spring of 2013” and it is likely that part of the right-wing opposition will vote for it. In Finland, a bill allowing marriage between same-sex couples was submitted last March. In Germany, where the decision of the Constitutional Court ruling that same-sex couples should have the same treatment as heterosexual couples is running into trouble on its way to becoming federal law, because of hostility from the right and the Liberals in power. In Luxembourg, the bill on “gay marriage” should come to a vote in 2013. And in the UK, the government has announced its intention to legalise same-sex marriage “by the end of this term.” In other countries, like Italy, Poland and Greece, the debate for now relates to civil pacts, the first step towards the recognition of marriage.

Where it exists, the debate is often passionate, even fiery. But it is flawed in our view by a misunderstanding that can be found whenever a social issue, such as abortion, divorce, euthanasia, gay marriage, crosses over into terrain where religious beliefs are involved.

It is possible to have a secular, liberal approach to these questions; however, it may clash with the beliefs convictions of part of the population, the fact of extending rights to another part cannot affect their own. Recognising a right does not mean making the exercise compulsory for all. To offer a choice does not require that a choice be made. To oppose a measure that concerns the intimate sphere of others, is intolerance.
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»Marriage for all