Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 09:34 AM Jan 2012

The Gay Male Couple’s Guide to Nonmonogamy

http://www.advocate.com/Arts_and_Entertainment/Features/The_Gay_Male_Couple_Guide_to_Nonmonogamy/

Mikey Rox and Everett Earl Morrow, both now 30, were committed to monogamy when they met and fell in love. That was five years ago. “After a couple instances of infidelity to which we both confessed, we decided it’s not realistic to expect either of us to never hook up with anyone else ever again,” says Rox, principal of Paper Rox Scissors Copy and Creative in Manhattan. The legally married couple has had an open relationship for the last two years. “Who wouldn’t want to be allowed to hook up with other guys and have their husband be OK with it?” he asks. “Isn’t that what most men dream of, and isn’t the limitation of sex with one partner in a marriage the reason why so many people cheat?” Adds Morrow, “As two men, sex isn’t particularly emotional for either of us. That enables us to separate our love for one another from the occasional physical attraction we may have for another guy.”

Matthew and Pablo, married 40-something realtors in Palm Springs, Calif., were monogamous for the first eight of their 15 years together. “We sort of just fell into our open relationship,” says Matthew. “It’s been a slow evolution. In the beginning, we only played together, which made it feel less threatening.” They still enjoy the occasional threesome, but for the last few years have increasingly sought sex outside the relationship.

Jelle and Guido, both 44-year-old ground personnel for an international airline in Amsterdam, have been together since 1997. For 10 years monogamy reigned. But when physical attraction waned, sex fell by the wayside and the relationship soured, eventually hitting rock bottom. The two figured they had nothing to lose, opened up their relationship, and saved it. “I’m really happy,” says Guido. “It made our relationship stronger. I’m glad he’s my partner, I love him, and I believe it was a wise decision to give each other the freedom we needed.” Adds Jelle: “There are so many things keeping us together: love, trust, friendship, security, common hobbies and interests, humor, a shoulder to cry on. Much too much to give up for that tiny but oh so important aspect in life that is sex.”

Although no one knows for sure how many gay couples are in open relationships, or whether they are on the decline, it’s certain these men are not alone. “I would feel comfortable saying that at least four out of five long-term gay male couples are not monogamous,” says Beverly Hills sexologist Winston Wilde. “Monogamy rarely does work for more than two years — for most straight and bi men as well.”
48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Gay Male Couple’s Guide to Nonmonogamy (Original Post) xchrom Jan 2012 OP
That's been my experience, too MNBrewer Jan 2012 #1
i've never done monogamy -- i'm not interested in it. xchrom Jan 2012 #2
You guys have all the fun... DURHAM D Jan 2012 #3
“Monogamy rarely does work for more than two years — for most straight and bi men as well.” Fearless Jan 2012 #4
+1000! William769 Jan 2012 #5
Amen! queerart Jan 2012 #16
Doesn't the word "rarely" in the quote indicate that it's not 100%? MNBrewer Jan 2012 #20
Rarely assumes that monogamous gays are an extreme minority. Fearless Jan 2012 #24
I think studies bear out that "monogamy" IS in the minority. MNBrewer Jan 2012 #28
That's not true. closeupready Jan 2012 #29
I can't post a link to it. MNBrewer Jan 2012 #32
You asserted the claim, so the burden is your's to substantiate it, not mine. closeupready Jan 2012 #35
See post 34 MNBrewer Jan 2012 #36
That study does NOT support your claim. closeupready Jan 2012 #37
By doing what? MNBrewer Jan 2012 #38
Alright, then MNBrewer Jan 2012 #39
That STILL does not support your initial claim. closeupready Jan 2012 #40
My claim was that most long term couples aren't monogamous MNBrewer Jan 2012 #43
Wrong. The data shows most DO agree to monogamy. closeupready Jan 2012 #44
Wrong MNBrewer Jan 2012 #45
No. The data do NOT show that at all. closeupready Jan 2012 #46
What they said the agreed to was not what they were MNBrewer Jan 2012 #47
ok. I'm done here. You're wrong, but there's no discussing this with you, IMO. closeupready Jan 2012 #48
I have to respectfully disagree. Fearless Jan 2012 #30
How many of those "monogamous" couples really were? MNBrewer Jan 2012 #33
In the second linked article. MNBrewer Jan 2012 #34
To which I add Fearless Jan 2012 #42
This is something often not spoken of in our community. It's an "elephant in the room." Behind the Aegis Jan 2012 #6
in my early years i considered my self a failure for either straying myself or xchrom Jan 2012 #7
And there are still many, to this day, who try to shame you for it. Behind the Aegis Jan 2012 #8
i think part of it was a kind of finally surrendering to being Gay. xchrom Jan 2012 #9
I think you are exactly correct. Behind the Aegis Jan 2012 #10
Lol! - yeah - I didn't want to be misunderstood. Nt xchrom Jan 2012 #11
Interesting. BigDemVoter Jan 2012 #12
Something I think we can all relate to. xchrom Jan 2012 #13
I agree it's situational HillWilliam Jan 2012 #21
Every relationship is different, every circumstance special....My partner and I Rowdyboy Jan 2012 #14
Y'all sound a lot like us HillWilliam Jan 2012 #22
We're pretty much coming from the same place...Don't you love being in love with your best friend? Rowdyboy Jan 2012 #25
It's true. We're like two halves of the same thing. HillWilliam Jan 2012 #27
"... he smells really, really good." LOL, yes, that's always a plus. closeupready Jan 2012 #26
I don't have any problem with open relationships. Not sure why closeupready Jan 2012 #15
IMO, this makes it sound like being gay is all about the sex theAntiRand Jan 2012 #17
You "don't follow the logic"....???? Yes, sex is logical, therefore these couples must be following closeupready Jan 2012 #18
BWAH! HillWilliam Jan 2012 #23
It should be about what is best for the individual Fearless Jan 2012 #19
That's probably what you think. Call Me Wesley Jan 2012 #31
Emotions aren't logical, Mr. Spock. GodlessBiker Jan 2012 #41

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
1. That's been my experience, too
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 10:32 AM
Jan 2012

Open relationships are the rule among the long term partnered male couples I know.

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
2. i've never done monogamy -- i'm not interested in it.
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 10:34 AM
Jan 2012

my experience has been -- an intense honey moon -- and then negotiations for how to go forward.

DURHAM D

(32,609 posts)
3. You guys have all the fun...
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 11:03 AM
Jan 2012

In the 60s and 70s every male couple I knew was in an open relationship. As a lesbian it was fascinating to watch and realize that they had a good working model for maintaining long term relationships. Some lesbians felt threatened by the setup but I just watched and passed no judgment. Well frankly I was envious.

Once the plague arrived my male couple friends tried to re-tool and be more like us. It was difficult - It was painful - It didn't work.

The best marriages I have observed over the years are between nonmonogamous gay males and a few nonmonogamous hetero couples.

The article describes the essentials of making an open relationship work. The rules are the same now as they were then - You just gotta talk to each other.

cheers

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
4. “Monogamy rarely does work for more than two years — for most straight and bi men as well.”
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 02:28 PM
Jan 2012

Bull shit.

That's about all I have to say.


EDIT TO ADD: What really irritates me is when people try to speak for others. Speak for your self (author of the article) and your relationships. What works for you works for you, what works for me works for me. I'd appreciate not being told who I should love or how I should love them. Thanks. (That is directed to the author of the article not the OP.) To each, their own.

queerart

(1,784 posts)
16. Amen!
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 04:03 PM
Jan 2012

Thanks for saying this.... as someone needed to!


Just another article for the Christian Terrorists to cherry pick from to brow beat the GLBTQI community....


Mind you, I'm not blowing shit to the OP for posting the story, as I think we all should be well informed about the information floating around about us, and our lives... But I mean really..... did the author only ask his friends how they dealt with being sexually bored? As of course, they will all have the same answer.....


Ask a group of haters how they feel about Queers, and see if the answer deviates by much......


Birds Of A Feather, Flock Together...




Fearless

(18,421 posts)
24. Rarely assumes that monogamous gays are an extreme minority.
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 02:50 PM
Jan 2012

It is a statement the author (not the OP) states as fact. I take issue with this presumption.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
29. That's not true.
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 01:44 PM
Jan 2012

At least, I'm not aware of any such studies or other impartial substantiation for that claim. Can you please post a link to same? Thanks in advance.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
32. I can't post a link to it.
Mon Jan 16, 2012, 10:18 AM
Jan 2012

And I bet neither can you. I've seen very few long lasting relationships that I actually believed were monogamous. In some cases it's claimed, but I've seen with my own eyes that it's not. Perhaps it's a difference between Urban and Rural couples? who knows?

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
35. You asserted the claim, so the burden is your's to substantiate it, not mine.
Mon Jan 16, 2012, 11:33 AM
Jan 2012

That's how it works.

Your anecdotal experience is interesting, but not exactly a random sample of gay people. So you really can not generalize from your personal anecdotes to larger populations, and expect others to view it as Truth as you do.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
37. That study does NOT support your claim.
Mon Jan 16, 2012, 11:46 AM
Jan 2012

>>To answer the research question, I used t tests to compare the 73 couples identifying themselves as monogamous to the 48 self-reported open dyads (see Table 2). There were no significant differences on demographic variables or length of relationship, dyadic adjustment, affectional expression, dyadic consensus, or dyadic cohesion.Monogamous couples scored significantly lower (p < .05) on dyadic satisfaction than their open counterparts. However, when broken monogamous agreement couples were removed from the monogamous group, there was no longer a significant difference between monogamous and nonmonogamous couples on dyadic satisfaction.<<

73 of 121, or almost 2/3, of couples identified their relationship as monogamous, not open.

The researcher then continues to identify couples that are in "broken monogamous agreement" relationships. That does NOT indicate that they are then "non-monogamous"; it means that one or both partners broke the agreement.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
38. By doing what?
Mon Jan 16, 2012, 11:54 AM
Jan 2012

If not having sex outside of the relationship, thereby MAKING it non-monogamous.

If someone says they're in a monogamous relationship, yet has sex outside of that relationship, two things are true. 1. They're lying. 2. They are NOT in a monogamous relationship.

If saying you're monogamous while having outside sex doesn't count as non-monogamy, then what does?

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
39. Alright, then
Mon Jan 16, 2012, 12:16 PM
Jan 2012

40 monogamous couples: 48 non-monogamous couples: 33 broken monogamy couples.

Given that, 40:48, which is the majority?

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
44. Wrong. The data shows most DO agree to monogamy.
Mon Jan 16, 2012, 07:46 PM
Jan 2012

Post-facto commencement of relationship, there is infidelity, NOT a transition to a non-monogamous relationship.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
45. Wrong
Mon Jan 16, 2012, 08:53 PM
Jan 2012

Most long term relationships are non-monogamous. It's very clear in the data.

And, having sex with people other than one's one-and-only partner while declaring monogamy doesn't make one part of a monogamous couple any more than saying you're the King of Mars makes you the King of Mars.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
46. No. The data do NOT show that at all.
Mon Jan 16, 2012, 08:57 PM
Jan 2012

Period.

It shows that almost 2/3 of gay couples agree to monogamous relationships.

So the data actually shows that you are completely wrong.

It also shows that in some gay relationships in which monogamy was agreed to, infidelity later occurs.'

That does NOT equate to agreeing to an open relationship.

You are attempting to equate infidelity with open relationships.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
47. What they said the agreed to was not what they were
Mon Jan 16, 2012, 09:03 PM
Jan 2012

Monogamy is rarer among gay male couples than non-monogamy and open relationships. The data are unequivocal on that point.

You're saying that the couples that weren't monogamous, but said they were should be counted as monogamous, and I say they shouldn't be. Even if they're not counted as open relationships, they must be excluded from the numbers of "monogamous" relationships, as they're NOT monogamous!

#Open relationships>#Monogamous relationships. it's right there in the data.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
48. ok. I'm done here. You're wrong, but there's no discussing this with you, IMO.
Mon Jan 16, 2012, 10:18 PM
Jan 2012

To draw an analogy, when you marry someone, and then later get divorced, it is false to claim you were never married.

I get that maybe you are disappointed that the world doesn't live up to high ideals. That doesn't mean we don't all aspire to health, happiness, prosperity and love for everyone.

Peace to you, MNBrewer.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
30. I have to respectfully disagree.
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 02:21 PM
Jan 2012

Studies show that it is either conflicted or likely impacted by outside forces such as the illegality of same sex marriage... (http://books.google.com/books?id=dXccg9o9zZkC&lpg=PA475&ots=jFLJTlg9PM&dq=gay%20monogamy%20study&lr&pg=PA463#v=onepage&q=gay%20monogamy%20study&f=false)

Likewise some studies I have read, find no difference between "straight" and "gay" percentages for monogamous or polyamorous relationships. For example... (http://www.ftfhalland.se/filer/MongamyArticlePublished.pdf)

Of course, the major issue with sex studies is that very few are done regarding these issues even today. It is also hard to determine, because the studies are usually based on people's verbal statements. Take from that what you want.

In my personal experience, I find that the previous study seems to hold most true. The growth of the marriage equality movement seems to encourage our youngest members to be monogamous. Of course, I would argue that you can't make someone one or the other, but can only support what their true nature is in surfacing. But I digress. Such things are speculation. In my life, I have seen the desire for meaningful monogamous relationships to be in the majority at least 2 to 1 within the LGBT community.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
33. How many of those "monogamous" couples really were?
Mon Jan 16, 2012, 10:56 AM
Jan 2012

50%? 35%?

In my life I've seen the desire for meaningful non-monogamous relationships to be in the majority 10-1.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
34. In the second linked article.
Mon Jan 16, 2012, 11:15 AM
Jan 2012

Results: Frequencies

"In the sample, 73 couples (60.3%) reported that their relationship agreements were monogamous, and 48 (39.6%) stated that they were in sexually open/nonmonogamous relationships. In 33 (45.2%) of the 73 monogamous agreement couples, 1 or both partners reported outside sex since the beginning of the relationship; 17 (51.5%) of the broken monogamous agreement couples reported outside sex in the past year."

While 73 (60.3%) of the copules said they were monogamous and 48 (39.6%) said non-monogamous, 33 of those "monogamous" couples were not. Therefore 40 (33%) were actually monogamous, and 81 (67%) non-monogamous.

There is a stark difference between the ratios of monogamy:non-monogamy if it's based on what the couples say and what they do. In reality, most of the couples were non-monogamous.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
42. To which I add
Mon Jan 16, 2012, 04:33 PM
Jan 2012

The first link. And ask, how many black couples were monogamous before they were allowed to marry? Society plays a large role in how we act as individuals as the first link describes. IMHO the number of monogamous gays (for instance) has greatly increased in places where society fully accepts them.

But to each their own. It really doesn't matter who is in the majority, but that both are accepted as equals in society, that everyone is allowed to behave as their hearts' desire. Circling back to the quote previously, it is decidedly one-sided and I disagree with that mentality.

Behind the Aegis

(53,956 posts)
6. This is something often not spoken of in our community. It's an "elephant in the room."
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 04:06 PM
Jan 2012

The "standard" is monogamy. With GLBT folks trying to gain rights to marraige, many people still associate marriage with monogamy, and thus, gays should be in monogamous. In reality (or rather, my opinion), how one conducts his/her relationship is of NO concern to others, unless it infringes on others' rights. All open relationships are not the same. Some are very strict, others are more casual. One of my first experiences with someone in an open relationship was a heterosexual married couple of 22 years. I'll admit I had been indoctrinated with the idea of monogamy, but the more I listened to Mama-San, the more an open relationship made sense for their situation.

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
7. in my early years i considered my self a failure for either straying myself or
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 04:09 PM
Jan 2012

my partner straying.

once i looked at my self -- i realized i wasn't a monogamous creature.

Behind the Aegis

(53,956 posts)
8. And there are still many, to this day, who try to shame you for it.
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 04:15 PM
Jan 2012

We struggle with coming to grips with our sexual orientation. Then, we struggle with the decision to "come out" and to whom/when/to what level. Then we muddle through the sexual experiences looking for our "cup of tea." Finally, when struggle to get into and maintain a relationship. Personally, with all the struggling we do, I think a time comes when many of us just say "FUCK YOU! I KNOW who I am! And if you don't like it PISS OFF!"

I think the idea of monogamy is oversold. Just like people come in all types, shades, colors, and orientations, we also have different ways to express ourselves in relationships of our making.

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
9. i think part of it was a kind of finally surrendering to being Gay.
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 04:54 PM
Jan 2012

all those struggles you spoke of -- and then i experienced a bad bout of jealousy -- nothing i will ever put my self or any body else through.

i finally took a deep breath -- exhaled and accepted my self.

* i'm not equating nonmonogamy w/ being gay -- to those who might think i was.

Behind the Aegis

(53,956 posts)
10. I think you are exactly correct.
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 05:01 PM
Jan 2012

It was just one more "identity" to which you had to accept or deny. You chose to accept it. I believe we live in such a "sex-negative" cullture, that anything, even remotely, considered outside the "norm/standard" is looked down upon and is expected to be a source of shame and embarassment.

On a side note, I didn't think you were equating being gay with nonmonogamy. But, isn't it interesting you felt the need to add the caveat? I look at it as nipping it in the bud.

BigDemVoter

(4,150 posts)
12. Interesting.
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 11:26 PM
Jan 2012

I've done both monogamous & non, and I'm currently single, so you see that neither one worked for me

I'm not exactly partial to either, but as somebody earlier stated, the first 2 years are often monogamous for many couples before they reevaluate. So, perhaps I'd find myself quite content in a monogamous situation under certain circumstances & NOT under others.

HillWilliam

(3,310 posts)
21. I agree it's situational
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 11:17 AM
Jan 2012

HBB and I had some long talks when we got together and we both came to the conclusion that it's not the outside sex that causes the jealousy, it's the feeling of being excluded. It has been our experience that men will stray, so we decided that "straying" together made sense for a lot of reasons. Not the least of which is looking out for and taking care of each other. That is, sometimes the little head tries to take charge of the big head and the "crazy filter" doesn't kick in. I trust HBB to say, "I know you think he's hot, and I think he's real cute, too, but my crazy-detector is going off." and vice versa. There's a lot of dysfunction out in the community and we don't need it.

If someone is fixated on one of us but doesn't want anything to do with the other, that's also a red flag. We're a unit, even when we, uh, entertain a guest. It's not "two with one" in any direction: it's three having an equally good time at play. Any other situation is unfair. If nothing else, our relationship runs on being strictly fair and strictly honest with one another. Above anything else, we cherish our dead-honest friendship with one another. That has been the strong foundation of our relationship since day one. We trust each other's counsel without reservation.

Besides, it's as much fun to watch while you're catching your breath When morning arrives and everyone is equally sore and grinning we consider that a success. Almost reliably, we pounce each other again when Guest bids adieu.

So, no, we see nothing wrong with extracurricular activities as long as everyone is aware of and follows the ground rules.

Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)
14. Every relationship is different, every circumstance special....My partner and I
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 03:23 AM
Jan 2012

have led a largely monogamous relationship for 23 years. Prior to meeting him (I was 35, he 39) I was quite promiscuous, while he was in an 18 year marriage. After his divorce, we met and I fell for him immediately. Since then we've jointly explored outside opportunities a few times but always as a couple. I was stunned to learn years ago that he was actually jealous of me which really made me reconsider my basic assumptions about myself.

I'm forced to be completely honest with him because, after so many years he knows me too well for me to lie successfully, even if I wanted to. I've never been very good at it and his perceptiveness rules it out as an option now.

Part of our situation is, of course, due to our location. Options are somewhat limited in semi-rural Mississippi as you might suppose. Also, almost immediately after we fell in love we gave up the bar scene. The only ones in our area are 30 miles away and not that exciting when you know who you're going home with. We really only know a handful of gay people here so there's really not much competition.

Add to all that the fact that the two of us have very similar likes and dislikes, share political views, enjoy the same hobbies and he smells really, really good. Plus we share a taste in looking at and talking about men.

I'm not endorsing monogamy. Actually, I think its kind of silly when pursued as an end in itself. In our case it happened naturally and worked out well for us. And, as I said, its "largely" monogamous. I have this one really hot friend from college....

HillWilliam

(3,310 posts)
22. Y'all sound a lot like us
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 11:39 AM
Jan 2012

we cherish our friendship and guard it above all else. Even when the truth might hurt, we tell it and accept each other's advice. There's not a piece of @$$ in the world worth trading for that. But the rare occasions when we have a guest in, the ground rules are that the situation is a three-way, not two with each other leaving any one out.

In everything we do, from cooking to shopping to chores to having a playdate, HBB and I enjoy doing everything together. The watchword in our relationship is "be fair". Everything else flows naturally from cooking to shopping to chores to having a playdate. HBB is still the sexiest thing I see and he's not just my partner -- he's the best friend I've ever had.

Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)
25. We're pretty much coming from the same place...Don't you love being in love with your best friend?
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 01:59 AM
Jan 2012

It makes life so freaking easy, and fun.

I'm glad HBB is doing well. I know how worried you were.

HillWilliam

(3,310 posts)
27. It's true. We're like two halves of the same thing.
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 01:31 PM
Jan 2012

Thanks for the good wishes. We're so not out of the woods yet, just taking one day at a time.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
15. I don't have any problem with open relationships. Not sure why
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 01:09 PM
Jan 2012

it's even anyone's business but those who are involved in it.

 

theAntiRand

(40 posts)
17. IMO, this makes it sound like being gay is all about the sex
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 09:13 PM
Jan 2012

So the sex got stale and sleeping with others somehow brings them closer together? I don't follow the logic.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
18. You "don't follow the logic"....???? Yes, sex is logical, therefore these couples must be following
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 10:29 PM
Jan 2012

some kind of logic right?

You will, whippersnapper, as you get older.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
19. It should be about what is best for the individual
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 12:55 AM
Jan 2012

Each person has differing desires and goals in relationships. To each their own. It has nothing to do with age.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»The Gay Male Couple’s Gui...