Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hekate

(90,768 posts)
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 11:36 PM Feb 2022

On Request, a repost from GD: Re the ECONOMICS of Griswold/Roe and Male Resentment...

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216384017

Ruth Bader Ginsberg went to Law school in an era where deans used to invite the young men students over for “tea” or dinner, as a way of socializing them, introducing them around, and so forth. Maybe they still do that at elite schools, where making connections is of paramount importance. But I doubt they still do this, as they did to RBG: Any woman who managed to make it past the huge barriers to be there in the first place would be asked, upon introduction to the group, to please explain why she felt justified in taking the place that belonged to a man..

As women gained personal control over their fertility and could choose when or if to have a child, they were increasingly able to move into education and job categories that men believed belonged to men.

And a great many men (not all, please understand) have resented it like hell. From pathetic incels to the dean of a prestigious law school, to the US Senate, that resentment has not gone away.

It affects the military, the civilian police and firefighters, all manner of well-paid blue collar skilled crafts. These are men’s jobs; what makes a woman think she belongs here? Harassment remains, both subtle and blatant.

It affects choices for the SCOTUS right now. It’s the misogyny in the Senate. As Shirley Chisholm once memorably said, she suffered worse from misogyny than from racism.

And if all else fails, there is always rape (see: US Military and Military Academies). Because rape is not about sex — it is about control and domination. And what does rape do? It deposits the seed of the dominator into the body of the conquered. That is why it is and always has been a tool of war.

To return and to be 100% explicit: allowing women to control their own fertility allows them to impinge on economic and social territory some men believes is theirs by right. Just as if those women had a right.

I’m better today. I’ve regained my footing, and I am angry.

This is how it hit me yesterday
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216379304

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On Request, a repost from GD: Re the ECONOMICS of Griswold/Roe and Male Resentment... (Original Post) Hekate Feb 2022 OP
Thank you, my sister, for this clear and depressing analysis. niyad Feb 2022 #1
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»On Request, a repost from...