Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

maddezmom

(135,060 posts)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 01:55 PM Feb 2012

The conservative crusade against women’s health

There seems to be a trend among the Republican Party regarding women's health: they don't care for it. It isn't as if this is anything new or surprising in itself, but what is astounding is the number of bills that have come up in state legislatures that would severely hinder a woman's right to choose whether or not she is pregnant.

Last Tuesday, a fetal personhood amendment passed through the Virgina House. This bill would define a "person" as existing from the moment of fertilization. In addition, the bill would require that women go through a transvaginal screening procedure before getting an abortion.

The passage of this amendment is problematic for several reasons. First, it obviously attempts to deny women control over their reproductive system. If a woman doesn't want to become a mother, she should be able to have the reasonable option of ending her pregnancy. (I won't say any more about this; the arguments for and against abortion are best left for another column.)

Second, the requiring of a transvaginal ultrasound is wrong for two reasons. First, displaying the image of a woman's uterus is a clear ploy to try to psychologically coerce women into changing their minds about getting an abortion. This is already an extremely tough decision for many women, and it's insulting to assume that they are unaware of the implications of that decision. And second, the fact that this ultrasound must be transvaginal is essentially state-sanctioned rape. An internal ultrasound is medically unnecessary for an abortion, and forcing a woman to go through such a procedure is wrong, and even possibly traumatizing for women who have been victims of sexual assault.

more: http://www.northern-iowan.org/the-conservative-crusade-against-women-s-health-1.2703340

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The conservative crusade against women’s health (Original Post) maddezmom Feb 2012 OP
Life in prison without the possibility of parole... SpankMe Feb 2012 #1
The termination doesn't even need to be intentional. wandy Feb 2012 #2

SpankMe

(2,970 posts)
1. Life in prison without the possibility of parole...
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 02:25 PM
Feb 2012

...for exercising the constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy.

Republican thinking has truly come off the rails and entered the realm of altered consciousness. The fact that even a single piece of paper was consumed on this issue in the Iowa state house is further evidence that conservative vs. normal thinking in this country are no longer reconcilable.

This tide of Christian Talibanism must be turned - completely and permanently, and within the next 2 elections - or America will have to split in two. Sorry. As whacked out as secessionist thinking is, I'm starting to think there may be some inevitability to it.

wandy

(3,539 posts)
2. The termination doesn't even need to be intentional.
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 02:43 PM
Feb 2012

It would be up to Judge and Jury if a woman fell down the steps accidently or on pourpes. Discusting.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»The conservative crusade ...