The Lincoln-Douglas debates weren’t as great as Gingrich thinks

[ellisonz]

By Harold Holzer, Published: January 27

Harold Holzer’s many books on Lincoln and the Civil War include “The Lincoln-Douglas Debates: The First Complete, Unexpurgated Text.”

For months, Newt Gingrich has floated the same challenge to President Obama that underdogs have hurled at their political rivals for more than a century: Let’s debate. And not just once or twice, but many times, with no moderators to intervene or inhibit us. Just two candidates, head to head — Lincoln-Douglas style.

As a Lincoln historian, I’ve studied the famous meetings between challenger Abraham Lincoln and incumbent Stephen A. Douglas that set the prairies on fire during the 1858 U.S. Senate race in Illinois. Gingrich has even called me to discuss them. As I’ve told Gingrich, the problem is that, as famous as the debates are, their reputation far outweighs their value. And they’re hardly an inspiring model for modern candidates seeking to showcase their oratorical skills.

More: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-lincoln-douglas-debates-werent-as-great-as-gingrich-thinks/2012/01/25/gIQABwX1VQ_story.html

[JDPriestly]

1. I'm surprised that Newt Gingrich would want to model

the debates this year on the Lincoln-Douglas debates because Obama is the Lincoln type -- relatively slow and quiet-spoken and Gingrich would be the Douglas type -- an overweight, overconfident loudmouth. You would think Gingrich would want to avoid thinking about the Lincoln-Douglas debates.

[LiberalFighter]

2. It is what happens when one thinks they are more intelligent than reality.