Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumIf you don't think a 7 round clip is cool - learn to reload.
Last edited Sat Jan 19, 2013, 10:09 AM - Edit history (1)
All the wailing over the NY gun safety bill reveals cognitive dissonance among gun cultists.
First they cry "but a mass murderer only needs seconds to insert a new 7 round clip!!1111".
but then they wail "but 7 round clips don't allow housewives to defend themselves!!11".
If a mass murderer can quickly reload a 7 round clip, so can a housewife.
Get over it.
yup
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)Glaug-Eldare
(1,089 posts)Last edited Thu Jan 17, 2013, 09:30 PM - Edit history (1)
The attacker who is executing a plan made in advance, or the defender who is reacting to an unknown threat?
Whose marksmanship will be less degraded by stress?
Which one will be more capable of manipulating restricted-capacity magazines?
Which one is more likely to have practiced fast reloads in the immediate future?
Which one is more likely to possess banned magazines?
Which one is more likely to possess multiple firearms?
Who receives a greater advantage from a 7rd limit?
Anybody have an answer?
If you get an answer to that (other than some irrelevant snark) I'll be more than surprised.
A killer with a bunch of defenseless people in an enclosed space can kill just as many people with low capacity weapon and multiple reloads as he/she can with a larger capacity weapon because there's no time constriction as there is against, say, someone in a defensive posture against an armed attacker. If you look at these school shootings, the assailants had all the time in the world to commit their atrocities. Even the Sandy Hook killer changed magazines several times when they were only half-empty.
The only time a "high-capacity" magazine comes into tactical advantage is against another attacker where suppression fire, having to reload less than the other guy, or facing multiple attackers is an issue.
xoom
(322 posts)Glaug-Eldare
(1,089 posts)jpak
(41,757 posts)yup
Glaug-Eldare
(1,089 posts)yup
shadowrider
(4,941 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)and I haven't heard anyone complaining about the magazine restriction in the context you are.
http://mason.gmu.edu/~amcdonal/Other%20Techniques.html
sarisataka
(18,648 posts)ten rounds was the magic number, now that NY decided to slip the slope we are going with seven? What if Illinois says five is the limit or New Mexico wants sixteen?
I'm confused, can I still use a cricket bat?
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)...beans will be 10 to a can from now on???
sarisataka
(18,648 posts)no cans of assault beans
We will also have to look into wheel spoke limits. Those aerodynamic things have no place outside of sanctioned races, or licensed body guards.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)...while you're at it. No more than 10 gallons to a tank.
And no fair adding 40 feet of aftermarket 1" gas line either.
hack89
(39,171 posts)apocalypsehow
(12,751 posts)Kick, Rec.
*( )
sarisataka
(18,648 posts)Military--Intelligence
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)http://mason.gmu.edu/~amcdonal/Propaganda%20Techniques.html
sylvi
(813 posts)The Hollywood fantasy comes from the grab nuts where every armed encounter is settled by one shot from a six-shot revolver, 100 yards away, striking the assailant in the leg and ending all danger, a la Dirty Harry.
The Hollywood fantasy comes from grab nuts that believe the same cops who shoot unarmed civilians and beat down OWS protesters are the ones we're supposed to give up our last line of defense and depend on for personal protection.
The Hollywood fantasy comes from grab nuts who have adopted this American exceptionalism idea of "can't happen here" when it comes to one day facing a tyrannical government, or the defeatist and fatalistic mindset that if it does there is absolutly nothing the populace will be able to do about it.
actslikeacarrot
(464 posts)...is a second gun. I agree with magazine limits, hope they do some kind of exchange program?
jpak
(41,757 posts)Glaug-Eldare
(1,089 posts)Who is more likely to possess two or more firearms? Attacker or defender?
jpak
(41,757 posts)yup
Glaug-Eldare
(1,089 posts)Last edited Sat Jan 19, 2013, 05:31 AM - Edit history (1)
After all, if your answer is for defenders to have as many guns as they can, they shouldn't be hobbled by laws saying how many they're allowed to have.
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)Step 1 -- lightly oil the old mags and place in a shoebox
Step 2 -- wait for the inevitable challenge to strike down the restriction provision
Step 3 -- put your old mags back into circulation
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)If 7 rounds is good enough for the average citizen, then 7 rounds is also plenty for the police. Maybe they can lead by example and only have 6 rounds.
ileus
(15,396 posts)Puha Ekapi
(594 posts)...not since I gave my M1 to my cousin 20 years ago.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)Puha Ekapi
(594 posts)...how hastily written and passed that law is. They didn't think it through to any degree. It was a "Quick, pass more restrictions before they wake up!", kinda deal. I only hope that saner heads prevail on a national level.
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)... closer to the election cycle.
Puha Ekapi
(594 posts)...that you are wrong this time. I'm not ready to have my rights stripped, and REALLY not ready to have a Republican Senate and Presidency in the near future.
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)xoom
(322 posts)Pass quick, amend later!
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)BTW it banned all handguns, including the cops.
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)Pass now -- let the SCOTUS work out the details.
Looks like they're going to have to make a gritty reboot of an old classic ... call Zack Snyder!
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Sound just fine to me. Smith and Wesson makes 7 different models. Between $1,000 and $1,500, but they are all quality guns. I'm thinking of buying two of the Model 627. Plus some 8 shot speed loaders.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)Just buy an older one.
Remmah2
(3,291 posts)Totally compliant.
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)... you've become an expert in defensive firefights since last we spoke. Will you be writing a book?
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)rrneck
(17,671 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)BTW, as the law is currently written, all handguns are banned including for police. There is a reason why you don't push a first draft through passage without anyone reading it, or without the required three day review time New York apparently has.
sarisataka
(18,648 posts)Even if you wish to argue the police need more ammo to fight criminals, why do retired officers also need large magazines?
Straw Man
(6,624 posts)... that now in New York, currently-owned 10-round magazines are grandfathered but by law can only be loaded with seven rounds, even in one's own home? Hear and obey, oh law-abiding gun owner! Hear and disregard, criminal or murderer.
The Governor, in his wisdom, has given the criminal an automatic advantage of at least three rounds, and possibly much more.
I feel so much safer now.
Response to jpak (Original post)
Post removed
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cohioan741
(3 posts)regarding the ability/willingness of criminals to obtain/use outlawed guns and magazines rather than the pros-cons of the law itself.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Straw Man
(6,624 posts)He rammed this thing through in a midnight session, waiving the three-day waiting period for new bills. It was delivered to Senators twenty minutes before they voted on it. It may have the unique distinction of being the first piece of legislation to undergo legal challenges from both the NRA Aand the ACLU.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)He is well liked in this state, and he is not a thug.
Straw Man
(6,624 posts)Or do you just live in a community that won't be affected so you don't care?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I have relations in the lower Hudson Valley that will be affected by it. But on the whole I think he is a good guy.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)Thanks for helping me see the light, buddy.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)I hit a dry spell but this post has inspired me!
derby378
(30,252 posts)I knew the state legislature passed a gun control bill, but I haven't heard of a gun safety bill. Please elaborate.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)for control.