Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumNew York student, pulls an AR15 rifle on some people...
..That where actively breaking into his house. Good thing the robbers knew that the AR15 "is ONLY good for killing lots of people, has absolutely no other use at all, and only crazy people and mass killers have them" Since they where of the peaceful sort of home invaders, they ran, and possibly, STILL running...
http://www.13wham.com/mediacenter/local.aspx?videoid=3914126
Swamp Lover
(431 posts)Or are these timid little wimps trying to become heroes to the gun nut crowd?
virginia mountainman
(5,046 posts)Swamp Lover
(431 posts)According to the gun owner, the weapon was properly locked up and stored unloaded.
When common sense prevails and gun owners are subject to strict liability for unsafe practices, there will be a lot more who treat weapons with due respect.
This story may not be believable, but maybe some gun owners will learn a valuable lesson about how to treat a weapon with respect. Had the gun owners who provided the weapons to the killers in Colorado and Sandy Hook been as responsible, there would have been no deaths.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Probably grab the shotgun instead though. Nothing says 'get the fuck out of my house' like a semi-auto shotgun.
sylvi
(813 posts)The '70s called. They want their machismo back, stud.
safeinOhio
(32,674 posts)Secured basement window. $40.
Both stop intruders with BB guns.
virginia mountainman
(5,046 posts)PRICELESS...
Swamp Lover
(431 posts)What? No comment re: storing weapons, unloaded, in gun safe? Thread getting away from you virg?
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)slap magazine in, don't even have to pull back on the charging handle to scare the shit out of anyone.
Swamp Lover
(431 posts)there will always be weak, frightened, people who cannot live without a crutch.
Gun safes and trigger locks should be part of the gun control debate so that the weakness of some doesn't become a detriment to the rest of us.
raidert05
(185 posts)Because no one has the right to protect themselves or others, everyone should just take it like a "man" and lay down.
Swamp Lover
(431 posts)Weak, frightened, people have a "victim" complex because they see danger around every corner.
When you are an ant, you are constantly afraid of giants.
Unfortunately many gun nuts are ants who think that a gun makes them a giant. In fact, they are just armed ants. Not the same as a giant.
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)... victims don't exist?
Because danger doesn't exist around EVERY corner then it doesn't exist around ANY corner?
I think you're doing a disservice to the millions who have been preyed upon by violent people.
Swamp Lover
(431 posts)I don't know why you want to arm them.
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)... didn't you just say you don't have to be armed to be threatening? People are dangerous because they
A) have the power to do ill
B) have the willingness to do ill
Having a firearm you are competent to operate available for your protection will, in certain circumstances, negate or, at minimum, equalize A) in a way no other method can. And without A), B) often goes away, at least long enough to resolve the immediate situation.
Swamp Lover
(431 posts)That is one of the primary problems. Too many gun owners feel that a gun is a magic wand that gives them power over others.
A black kid in a hoodie in your neighborhood- get your gun.
Teens playing loud music- get a gun.
Guys at the bar ribbing you because your team lost the big game- a gun makes them respect you.
I have a better solution. Self esteem and a measure of backbone.
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)Are you unfamiliar with the guarantee to "the pursuit of happiness"?
Of course I have the right to AVOID ills -- so do you -- we just don't have the guarantee they won't find us anyway.
USING your gun in any of those situations is already a felony, so why heap more regulation on top of what is already there? Unless your motivation has nothing to do with preventing felonies.
Swamp Lover
(431 posts)And "Pursuit of Happiness" is not a Right outlined in the Constitution, but is a short phrase in the Declaration of Independence, by no means "guaranteed".
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)the Progressive era, mostly through common law. Even without the laws, the federal level and most if not all states have been SYG for quite sometime. California since about 1895.
Swamp Lover
(431 posts)So I guess you'll be throwing a parade for George Zimmerman. Sorry. I'll be busy that day.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)As for Zimmerman, I'll wait for the real truth to come out during trial. I'll either pay for the parade to Stark or increase my cynicism of Florida style trial by media/electronic lynching.
Swamp Lover
(431 posts)despite your freakish pal having stalked an unarmed boy, there will be no trial.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)he isn't claiming SYG, he is claiming self defense under duty to retreat rules.
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)A right endowed by a Creator trumps a right endowed by Congress any day of the week (and twice on Saturday). Are you familiar with any part of the Constitution that negates rights endowed by my Creator?
You should consider yourself lucky that the 2A is only a Constitutionally-guaranteed right and not guaranteed by the Creator.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Light from darkness, Water and ground, Birds and creatures.....and, oh yeah...let's give every Ass an AR'.
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)... about following a conversation before jumping into it.
Or, just keep doing what you're doing. Whatever works for you.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Guaranteed by YOUR creator'
Some funny shit!
Edit: and so on the 7th day..He joined the Militia...and saw that it was good.
iiibbb
(1,448 posts)self defense.
Who are you to assume what layers I have?
Who are you to assume that I'm even protecting myself from home invaders every night?
You don't even know. But you fundamental problem is you drop everyone in the same box and assume things meant to be condescending.
I've got 2 close friends who were saved by guns, and they did it without shooting... but the presence of the gun is what turned the situations around.. That trumps anything you've got to say about the matter.
raidert05
(185 posts)No one wants to arm murders, robbers, rapist and anyone falling in line with those types of characters. Even if you made all the guns magically disappear more of the same would happen, and here in America we can get plenty creative on ways to do it. Sensible control on purchasing and vetting of individuals should definitely be strengthen and penalties for crimes committed with fire arms should go up too...But in to many situations gun charges are dropped or pleaded out in cases for confession of guilt.
Swamp Lover
(431 posts)Guns are far too easy to come by.
We have to do thorough background checks. May take a long time, but it must be done. Many people will fail and cannot have guns.
Sales must be regulated and private sales will not be allowed (just like liquor or cigarettes).
Gun owners will have to be liable for the weapons that they acquire. Mandatory gun safes and trigger locks.
(Sandy Hook and the Colorado Mall shootings were performed by killers who got their weapons from irresponsible gun owners who did not secure their weapons.)
Maximum sentences for gun crimes, including liablility for irresponsible owners.
There- we agree.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)Do all gun control advocates live in fear of Olympic target shooters? I noticed that Feinstien's bill seems to ban those pistols as "assault weapons" as did California until it had to be amended to accommodate Olympians.
here will always be weak, frightened, people who cannot live without a crutch.
http://academic.cuesta.edu/acasupp/as/404.htm
Swamp Lover
(431 posts)Go to the store, the bank, anywhere in public and private without a weapon. No problem.
But the Lord blessed me with the three B's. Balls, brains and backbone.
For those who have not been adquately blessed, there are weapons.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)that have much higher crime and murder rates in the US, but we aren't talking about that. I think you project or confuse propaganda with critical thinking.
Swamp Lover
(431 posts)If more gun nuts had higher self esteem, there would be fewer guns.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)see above propaganda technique. It has to do with chosen sport, culture, etc. Perhaps if gun control advocates had better arguments or better critical thinking skills, we could have more constructive discussions.
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)... you can call me a frightened, little, man with low self-esteem in an anonymous forum (the only way you could do that) and I'll keep my RKBA.
M'kay, Pumpkin?
Swamp Lover
(431 posts)I've had guns and natural courage. I prefer natural courage.
I can see how a gun is important to you, however.
Just secure the weapon responsibly, and operate it within the law, and your weakness will not be a hazard to the rest of us.
Remmah2
(3,291 posts)nt
Bay Boy
(1,689 posts)....you said so. You're afraid of guns and the proliferation of guns.
please cite the post.
Bullshit
sylvi
(813 posts)"I'll bet you're a big Lee Marvin fan."
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)This seems to confirm that the "gun control debate" is more about animosity and culture war with our fellow citizens than about protecting children and lessening crime.
Remmah2
(3,291 posts)Throw in a dog for added measure.