Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mikeb302000

(1,065 posts)
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 01:55 AM Feb 2013

Pastor Stanley Wilkinson Pleads Guilty - He Mistakenly Shot his Granddaughter

Local news reports

61-year-old Stanley Wilkinson was charged in January with one count of dangerous weapons – intentional discharge of firearm that endangers safety. He pled guilty today in Olmsted County District Court to the charge. The charge stems from an incident on December 10th.

At the time, Wilkinson told police that he heard a noise outside his home and grabbed his pistol. He fired two rounds after he saw someone trying to open the door. The person turned out to be his granddaughter who was struck in the neck. She was hospitalized after the shooting. Wilkinson will be sentenced on April 15 at 1:30.


As we mentioned at the time of the incident, guns do more harm than good. The fear-driven and foolish decision to have a gun in the house turned into a tragedy for this man and his family.

What's your opinion? Please leave a comment.
Cross posted at Mikeb302000
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pastor Stanley Wilkinson Pleads Guilty - He Mistakenly Shot his Granddaughter (Original Post) mikeb302000 Feb 2013 OP
Any responsible gun owner will tell you ... holdencaufield Feb 2013 #1
Your use of "we" seems more of the 'royal' and less of the 'editorial' type. friendly_iconoclast Feb 2013 #2
Are you a Hobbs or Locke fan? gejohnston Feb 2013 #3
I hate when that happens! nt rdharma Feb 2013 #4
me too gejohnston Feb 2013 #5
Happens way too often, eh? nt rdharma Feb 2013 #6
once is too often gejohnston Feb 2013 #7
1938 German law rdharma Feb 2013 #9
yes I know, gejohnston Feb 2013 #10
you didn't click on the link rdharma Feb 2013 #11
If you need it in basic language gejohnston Feb 2013 #12
appeals to emotion rdharma Feb 2013 #13
didn't say you did, I have no idea how you could possibly have come to that conclusion gejohnston Feb 2013 #14
"didn't say you did" rdharma Feb 2013 #15
My firearms do no harm, in fact they don't do anything without user input. ileus Feb 2013 #8
"don't do anything without user input" rdharma Feb 2013 #16
What's your definition of defective? Please elaborate. Thanks!! nt CokeMachine Feb 2013 #17
Idiot. actslikeacarrot Feb 2013 #18
That is actually the official #4. ManiacJoe Feb 2013 #19
ah, I was going off what I learned... actslikeacarrot Feb 2013 #20
 

holdencaufield

(2,927 posts)
1. Any responsible gun owner will tell you ...
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 02:00 AM
Feb 2013

... ALWAYS check your target.

Every action has a consequence.

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
2. Your use of "we" seems more of the 'royal' and less of the 'editorial' type.
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 02:04 AM
Feb 2013

Well, you did ask for opinions, Jason...

Seriously, in a country with 80 million gun owners, anecdotes like these have almost no statistical meaning.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
7. once is too often
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 02:52 AM
Feb 2013

regardless of how rare. That would be equally true if the child were killed by dumbass who was texting while driving. It is also no more nor no less tragic than this. That is why I detest posts like that one. It sometimes gives some people the impression that the means matter. Not only is it an appeal to emotion, but it feeds the NRA and GOA meme that gun control advocates care more about the weapon used than the life taken. If I were a gun control advocate, I would cringe at such things just like I cringe when some dim wit mentions the 1938 German law.

 

rdharma

(6,057 posts)
9. 1938 German law
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 05:48 PM
Feb 2013

I'm sure you don't understand what the 1938 "German law" actually meant.

It was actually "relaxed" gun laws!

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
10. yes I know,
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 06:01 PM
Feb 2013

that was my point. I'm guessing you didn't click on the link or think before speaking.

 

rdharma

(6,057 posts)
11. you didn't click on the link
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 08:28 PM
Feb 2013

Nothing in the link about the RWaffG, RGBl. I 1938.

I guess you should get a translation so you can figure out what I'm talking about.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
12. If you need it in basic language
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 08:34 PM
Feb 2013

gun control advocates making appeals to emotion is just as asinine as pro gunners basing an argument on the German law. If anyone needs a translation, I think you do.

 

rdharma

(6,057 posts)
13. appeals to emotion
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 08:49 PM
Feb 2013

I made no appeal to emotion. I just pointed out what was really contained in the 1938 German law that the gun nuts always like to cite.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
14. didn't say you did, I have no idea how you could possibly have come to that conclusion
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 09:00 PM
Feb 2013

Since we are talking about MikeB's OP, or at least I am, MikeB was the one making the appeal to emotion.

 

rdharma

(6,057 posts)
16. "don't do anything without user input"
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 09:18 PM
Feb 2013

That's why we need 100% universal background checks. To make sure the "user" isn't "defective".

actslikeacarrot

(464 posts)
20. ah, I was going off what I learned...
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 09:47 PM
Feb 2013

...with the Marines. Though I know all "weapons safety rules" are pretty much the same, just the order is changed.

1. Treat every weapon as if it was loaded.

2. Never point your weapon at anything you dont intend to shoot.

3. keep you finger straight and off the trigger until ready to fire.

4. Keep your weapon on safe until ready to fire.

unofficial 5th. Know your target and what lies beyond it.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Pastor Stanley Wilkinson ...