Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,881 posts)
Thu Mar 7, 2013, 10:38 AM Mar 2013

Senators seek tougher gun background checks for mentally ill

Source: Reuters

Senators seek tougher gun background checks for mentally ill

By Harriet McLeod
CHARLESTON, South Carolina | Wed Mar 6, 2013 8:03pm EST

(Reuters) - A Republican senator introduced bipartisan gun background check legislation on Wednesday that would make it harder for mentally ill people who are considered to be dangerous to buy a firearm.

The legislation proposed by Lindsey Graham would require reporting of certain mental illness treatments and legal proceedings to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, the clearinghouse for all new gun purchases.

Those cases would include anyone found not guilty of a crime by reason of insanity or anyone who received involuntary outpatient treatment from a psychiatric hospital.

Graham cited a recent case in his state of South Carolina as a key example of the failures of the current background check system and the need for reform.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/07/us-usa-guns-mentalhealth-idUSBRE92602I20130307
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senators seek tougher gun background checks for mentally ill (Original Post) Eugene Mar 2013 OP
I haven't read the details but this sounds like something I could support slackmaster Mar 2013 #1
Wierd. AtheistCrusader Mar 2013 #2
If due process is followed, I support this. Hopefully, funding is there. Eleanors38 Mar 2013 #3
without background checks on private sales BainsBane Mar 2013 #4
In my profession ... holdencaufield Mar 2013 #5
 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
1. I haven't read the details but this sounds like something I could support
Thu Mar 7, 2013, 11:17 AM
Mar 2013

Something less than an adjudication of mental defectiveness or an involuntary inpatient commitment, but still indicative that the person could be a threat to self or others.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
2. Wierd.
Thu Mar 7, 2013, 12:12 PM
Mar 2013

Doesn't sound like him.

Most of this reporting is in place already but the jump from state databases, to NICS is incentive based, not penalty based. If a state meets reporting requirements, they get access to a pool of money that the federal government maintains for some purposes, like law enforcement, PSA's, etc. That requirement needs to be penalty based, where a state will lose something, like highway funds, before we can expect universal compliance by all states.

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
4. without background checks on private sales
Thu Mar 7, 2013, 07:00 PM
Mar 2013

This is meaningless, and deliberately so. Look over there ---->
Just don't look at my guns.

 

holdencaufield

(2,927 posts)
5. In my profession ...
Thu Mar 7, 2013, 08:03 PM
Mar 2013

... I come across mentally precipitous persons all the time. Most of the time, it's a temporary state of being overwhelmed by everything going on their their lives -- medical problems, family problems, etc.

My advice is almost always the same -- STAY OUT of the mental health system if you can possibly work it out yourself. Friends, family, go to a shrink under a false name and pay cash (they love that) anything but getting into that bureaucracy that will club stamp your hand for the rest of your life and effect everything you do from the moment you enter that system.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Senators seek tougher gun...