Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumLicensed Gun Nut stands his ground against a 14-year-old girl's chihuahua and kills it.
Well I guess he was a law-abiding and responsible gun owner....until he wasn't? Or maybe he was just standing his ground?
Either way I'm sure the NRA will call for more guns and licensed "law-abiding" gun owners so that America can be a safer place.
14-year-old Detroit girl says that a neighbor shot and killed JoJo, her 1-year-old Chihuahua, because he wasnt on a leash and was making too much noise.
The licensed gun owner, however, told police that he gunned down the tiny dog because it was threatening him.
The girl, who WJBK declined to identify, said that she had gone inside for a few minutes while JoJo ran free in the yard. When she came back outside, the neighbor warned her to take the dog back in the house.
When he saw my dog running out of the bushes, , Im going to handle him myself, and then I guess my dog had run back up on him again, and he just shot him, the teen recalled as she cradled the dead dog in a blanket.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/04/04/licensed-gun-owner-says-he-killed-1-year-old-chihuahua-for-threatening-him/
Paul E Ester
(952 posts)shenmue
(38,538 posts)Downwinder
(12,869 posts)you need to carry a gun.
tblue
(16,350 posts)You need serious professional help. I wouldn't want to arm the paranoid and panicky, if that's even what this man was. Obviously he had no business carrying a loaded weapon if he could be scared by a 3 lb doggie. My gosh! That poor puppy and his girl!!!!! She will live with that memory her whole life. She'll need counseling to help her come to terms with this traumatic event, so she doesn't act out in turn. DAMN THIS!!!
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)I agree completely. I would question whether it was done intentionally to traumatize the girl.
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)oneshooter
(8,614 posts)MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)oneshooter
(8,614 posts)Response to oneshooter (Reply #17)
Cali_Democrat This message was self-deleted by its author.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Because, really, you're not.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Looks like you're not cut out for this comedy thing.
spin
(17,493 posts)Consequently I personally dislike the breed. I consider them to be barking rats. A Boston Terrier is a much better bread if you wish a small dog. (Note: Just my opinion which is largely influenced by my experience as a child.)
But I would never consider a Chihuahua attack as threatening to my life or health so I wouldn't use my handgun for defense. Of course if I was bit and couldn't find the owner, I might have to get a rabies shot.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I prefer my bread is made by Poodles actually!
spin
(17,493 posts)ileus
(15,396 posts)oneshooter
(8,614 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)What would he do if it were a Doberman named Satan? The most I would use on a dog is pepper spray.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 4, 2013, 07:08 PM - Edit history (1)
a license to shoot chihuahuas costs in Michigan and how high the bag limit is?
(Of course the guy that did this is an idiot and he needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extant of the law. To imply that all 'gun nuts' would do something similar is a cheap shot. How do we know he was a 'gun nut'?)
(I had to make an edit because I accidently wrote 'ia' instead of 'is'. I wouldn't wish to offend anyone with Iowa roots to report me and for a jury to hide my post because of a typo. I recently had a post hidden because of an innocent typo.)
rrneck
(17,671 posts)Wow. Learn something new every day.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)What makes him a gun nut? Well any time a tiny dog comes up to you and your first reaction is to pull out a gun and shoot it to death, you're a gun nut.
Yep.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)Licensed driver, no doubt.
If only we could ban cars...
I love animals, and that jerk who shot the dog should be punished as if he had shot a human, imho.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)and lose his DL. A nutjob driving a car is no better than a nutjob with a gun.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)It's a ridiculous comparison.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Straw Man
(6,799 posts)and lose his DL. A nutjob driving a car is no better than a nutjob with a gun.
Hey, we agree on something! I think that's twice now.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)At least I hope so, being of similar political persuasion and all.
Straw Man
(6,799 posts)I meant on the contentious "guns" topic. But yeah, high-five, fist-bump, cheers!
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)I'm not anti-gun, just anti-stupid where guns are concerned. In a perfect world, we could all have whatever guns we wanted and nobody would ever hurt another person. But in the world we actually live in, too many people are being hurt and killed. So, it's incumbent on those of us who support gun ownership to search for solutions.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)Wow, that's hyperbole at its finest.
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)No reason for animal abuse. None. It is a disgusting crime that indicates a dangerous person who should not be among the general population until he/she is successfully rehabbed, if that is possible.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)of yours, you're among the best. Of course the idiot should not have shot and killed the dog. But to equate that crime with the murder of a person is ridiculous.
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)As I am to mine.
I wonder what you think the max sentence should be for this coward of a man who shot a small dog.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)about the Michigan statutes (or any state) on situations like this to make an educated comment. I will make an uneducated comment however. If this guy thought about shooting this little dog before he actually committed the crime, as in premeditation, I do not think he should be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)When put that way, it does seem extreme, but I keep coming back to what a despicable act it is to harm a defenseless animal. People who can do such things need rehab or incarceration. I left the door open for rehab. Our society should make it clear through very tough consequences that animal abuse will not be tolerated. In that regard, punishment should be severe. I might go a bit farther than some on how severe. I have no sympathy for those who'd abuse a defenseless animal.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)for this guy, only contempt.
Blue_Tires
(57,259 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)As if anyone here favors shooting little dogs, as if anyone here is not in favor of prosecuting such, as if anyone here is incapable of sympathy.
petronius
(26,671 posts)that it's extremely unlikely that any adult human (or child, or other dog, or cat, or any living entity larger than an unusually small hamster) could ever be genuinely threatened by a chihuahua. I'll bet that there is a history of bad blood between the families involved, and the shooter simply seized an opportunity. And if that's the case, charges are to be desired: animal cruelty, illegal discharge, whatever...
dkf
(37,305 posts)Are you supposed to accept being bitten?
I don't support shooting the dog but that breed seems problematic.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)a chiihuahua ridiculous, even for you.
dkf
(37,305 posts)xchrom
(108,903 posts)gordianot
(15,540 posts)Not much need for proof in Court. This situation would make me seriously judgemental regarding the neighbor and am not the type who turns the other cheek.
bubbayugga
(222 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(43,622 posts)....people who legally own their guns are by their nature "good guys" and law abiding citizens, and the only people with guns you have to be worried about are the "criminals" who own them illegally.
Kind of like the "law abiding" legal gun owner who came into my office building last week and proceeded to shoot his wife and himself.
Pretty sure if the idiot in this news story didn't have a gun, that dog would most likely still be alive.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)BainsBane
(55,066 posts)I don't know what is.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)you know the rest.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Like the military with a new missile or weapon, the danger for some idiots in having a gun is looking for a reason to use it.
Zimmerman comes to mind.
BainsBane
(55,066 posts)Now that's just pathetic.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Of course it didn't take any legitimate courage, and I probably could have found a better term.
gopiscrap
(24,259 posts)obviously the gun was an extension of his penis
sarisataka
(21,342 posts)Jim__
(14,540 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)And of course this asshole is apparently in no trouble for this
petronius
(26,671 posts)I guess I could understand if the little thing was charging everyone, moving like lightning, with blood dripping from its little squirrel fangs or something, but that looked like more of a job for a paper-bag-scooping and a move to the nearest bushes...
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,603 posts)...is a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)She put the dog out then went back into the house, leaving it alone.
There's no excuse for using a gun on this animal that I can imagine and I wish the user had been investigated and arrested for discharging a firearm.
HOWEVER, if you watch the clip, you'll see that the yard has no fence, to to release an animal into your yard and then go back into your house is negligent.
This DOES NOT excuse the act of shooting the little dog, but as the officer explained, it's a lesson in responsible animal ownership and could have and should have been prevented.
NEVER let your dog, big or small, into public without being attached to it by a leash!
Poor dog, poor girl, I hope she gets another one and doesn't repeat the mistake.
(fire away)...
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Surely fresher bait can be had!
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)over at the castle ...