Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LAGC

(5,330 posts)
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 04:53 PM Jan 2014

Kalashnikov 'feared he was to blame' for AK-47 rifle deaths

The inventor of the Kalashnikov assault rifle apparently wrote to the head of the Russian Orthodox Church before he died expressing fears he was morally responsible for the people it killed.

Mikhail Kalashnikov, who died last month aged 94, wrote a long emotional letter to Patriarch Kirill in May 2012, church officials say.

He said he was suffering "spiritual pain" over the many deaths it caused.

Kalashnikov had previously refused to accept responsibility for those killed.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-25709371

Interesting article... the AK-47 (and its variants) definitely changed the landscape of modern warfare.

Curious that the proliferation of his 65-year-old invention caused him such mental anguish in his final days...

But how much can the inventor truly be blamed? If not the Kalashnikov, surely some other automatic rifle would have filled the void... maybe not as simple and elegant of a design, maybe not as rugged and inexpensive, but equally efficient killing machines none-the-less.

Doesn't it all still boil down to human nature and malicious intent? Or is the tool truly to blame in this case?

It is thought that more than 100 million Kalashnikov rifles have been sold worldwide.

It definitely had an impact, that's for sure...
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kalashnikov 'feared he was to blame' for AK-47 rifle deaths (Original Post) LAGC Jan 2014 OP
human nature Niceguy1 Jan 2014 #1
Not unlike Alfred Nobel, the "Merchant of Death": NYC_SKP Jan 2014 #2
Are we speaking pragmatically or morally? Kelvin Mace Jan 2014 #3
He was wrong...He developed a tool that was misused. ileus Jan 2014 #4
Some elderly, when they approach death, do feel remorse for what they have done. Kaleva Jan 2014 #5
re: "...Or is the tool (or its inventor) truly to blame in this case?" discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2014 #6
The Winchester Mansion with doors & halls to no where. Eleanors38 Jan 2014 #7
Spiritual Pain Is Better Than No Pain otohara Jan 2014 #8
I guess "Garand Thumb" doesn't count then DonP Jan 2014 #9
So according to you oneshooter Jan 2014 #11
Your post is more apt in GD. Eleanors38 Jan 2014 #12
This reminds me of the alleged 'deathbed conversion' of Darwin Helen Highwater Jan 2014 #10
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
2. Not unlike Alfred Nobel, the "Merchant of Death":
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 05:03 PM
Jan 2014

Who established the Nobel prize out of a sense of guilt, it would seem:

Alfred Nobel was born on 21 October 1833 in Stockholm, Sweden, into a family of engineers. He was a chemist, engineer, and inventor. In 1894, Nobel purchased the Bofors iron and steel mill, which he made into a major armaments manufacturer. Nobel also invented ballistite. This invention was a precursor to many smokeless military explosives, especially the British smokeless powder cordite. As a consequence of his patent claims, Nobel was eventually involved in a patent infringement lawsuit over cordite. Nobel amassed a fortune during his lifetime, with most of his wealth from his 355 inventions, of which dynamite is the most famous.

In 1888, Nobel was astonished to read his own obituary, titled The merchant of death is dead, in a French newspaper. As it was Alfred's brother Ludvig who had died, the obituary was eight years premature. The article disconcerted Nobel and made him apprehensive about how he would be remembered. This inspired him to change his will...

More at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize


Except for the prize part.
 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
3. Are we speaking pragmatically or morally?
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 05:12 PM
Jan 2014
But how much can the inventor truly be blamed? If not the Kalashnikov, surely some other automatic rifle would have filled the void


Yes, pragmatically speaking, someone else would have stepped in and created the weapon. But from a moral point of view, anyone who creates an instrument of death is responsible for its use. People can make all the arguments they wish about defensive use, hunting, etc, but the principle point of AK-47 was to kill people as efficiently as possible.

The man succeeded, and the blood is on his hands.

Kaleva

(36,298 posts)
5. Some elderly, when they approach death, do feel remorse for what they have done.
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 05:29 PM
Jan 2014

Whether that is warranted or not in this case can be debated.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
6. re: "...Or is the tool (or its inventor) truly to blame in this case?"
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 08:03 PM
Jan 2014

Is the inventor of beer responsible for DWI related deaths? No.

"It doesn't break, jam, or overheat. It'll shoot whether it's covered in mud or filled with sand. It's so easy, even a child can use it; and they do. The Soviets put the gun on a coin. (Well, not really.) Mozambique put it on their flag."

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
8. Spiritual Pain Is Better Than No Pain
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 02:09 PM
Jan 2014

The word "pain" associated with guns is forbidden at The NRA.



oneshooter

(8,614 posts)
11. So according to you
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 07:43 PM
Jan 2014

I should suffer " Spiritual Pain'' from the use of firearms that I have no control over?

 

Helen Highwater

(30 posts)
10. This reminds me of the alleged 'deathbed conversion' of Darwin
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 07:38 PM
Jan 2014

that was made up for proselytizing reasons.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Kalashnikov 'feared he wa...