Second Amendment applies to carrying guns in cars
I concur in judgment only on the basis that I would conclude that the individual right to bear arms contained in the Second Amendment extends to motor vehicles….
Because the statutes at issue in both Heller and McDonald dealt specifically with handgun restrictions within the home, the court’s central holdings in those cases “did not define the outer limits of the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.” However, the Heller court did undertake a careful and deliberate analysis of the meaning of both the prefatory and operative clauses of the Second Amendment, and concluded that the amendment, at its core, ensured the individual right of all Americans to have and carry weapons in case of confrontation. Heller, 554 U.S. at 579–603. While the court acknowledged that the right was not unlimited, it repeatedly emphasized that the Second Amendment secured an individual right that existed outside the context of an organized militia, and that the individual right to bear arms existed for self-defense purposes. Undoubtedly, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Heller, “[t]he Second Amendment … is now clearly an important individual right, which should not be given short shrift.”
As the Seventh Circuit has observed, “one doesn’t have to be an historian to realize that a right to keep and bear arms for personal self-defense in the eighteenth century could not rationally have been limited to the home.” Moore v. Madigan, 702 F.3d 933, 936 (7th Cir. 2012). It is axiomatic that the need to act in self-defense may arise outside the confines of one’s home, and specifically in a motor vehicle. The Ohio General Assembly expressly acknowledged this reality by enacting R.C. 2901.09(B), which provides that a person who is lawfully an occupant of either a “residence” or “vehicle” has “no duty to retreat before using force in self-defense or defense of another.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/02/07/second-amendment-applies-to-carrying-guns-in-cars/
The backlash continues.
= new reply since forum marked as read
The Supreme Court interprets "bear arms" as the right to mount weapons on your vehicle.
"You fringe gun grabbers are funny as shit."
No, we think those who feel they have to take their paranoia AKA "guns" with them EVERYWHERE are funny. I couldn't care less if every gun owner got their little toys taken away either. Some day, it WILL happen. Us majority of sane people will do it. 
and drank not one drop of alcohol
-I was driving
-I was carrying
-I choose to drink very rarely, perhaps once a year.
There are reasons to go to a bar that do not involve drinking.
I did get to see Gina Niemi paint the model for this:
and at the same time restrict arms in vehicles.
Why shouldn't the right to have tools for self-protection not be a portable one, at least in-state?
My concern is how the details differ from state to state-- do I stow in trunk or glove compartment, pull over and shift things at state border?