Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumIt’s time to elect politicians who are unafraid of the NRA
Because of our love for and obsession with guns, we should expect gun violence. These lethal weapons are part of our identity, our national character.
To put it bluntly: Guns are us.
I recall the first time guns entered my life. It was in 1949 in Groveland, Fla., when I was 4. Norma Padgett, a 17-year-old white woman, had accused four black men of raping her. After a failed attempt to storm the jail where the alleged rapists were being held, a mob of hundreds of white men shot up the houses of blacks in Groveland and burned a home to the ground.
http://mdjonline.com/view/full_story/19641195/article-It%E2%80%99s-time-to-elect-politicians-who-are-unafraid-of-the-NRA?instance=special%20_coverage_right_column
Trunk Monkey
(950 posts)or are you just doing a drive by?
rl6214
(8,142 posts)Trunk Monkey
(950 posts)They just want to pontificate from the (assumed) moral high ground
ileus
(15,396 posts)OneTenthofOnePercent
(6,268 posts)Politicians aren't afraid of the actual NRA... just the 80,000,000 gun owners the NRA attempts to influence at the polls. Politicians care about two things, getting money and getting reelected. It's tough to get reelected when a certain stance is literally guaranteed to rally tens of millions of votes against you. More or less, guns get votes.
Which brings us to our logical disconnect. If merely being antigun/antiNRA is enough to get one voted out of most offices, how in the hell does such a person expect to get voted INTO office?
In translation, the OP headline literally reads: "It's time to elect politicians who can't get enough votes"
Quite the oxymoron...
pipoman
(16,038 posts)are caused by guns are misguided. They are no more caused by "Because of our love for and obsession with guns, we should expect gun violence." than 'Because of our love for and obsession with cars, we should expect DUIs.'. No, we are the country of zero accessibility to mental health services until a crime has been committed..yet it's crickets on this issue by the groups which aren't interested in actually looking at the problem with an intent to solve it..only to forward their politically losing gun control agenda to the exclusion of cause.
As for the "politicians who are unafraid of the NRA", they are there already pushing their gun control agenda..which is also the agenda of much of their constituency. Because a politician is a strong 2nd amendment supporter has little to do with the NRA and much to do with their own constituency's wishes. Wishful thinking that the NRA is the boogieman doesn't make it true...the NRA is the voice of the opposition to legislation for legislation's sake on this issue. If it wasn't for the ACLU the police could maybe intervene on people before they actually committed a crime...but alas, that millstone we call the Bill of Rights is so burdensome..
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)Anti-gun politicians, except in some districts, are having a hard time staying in office.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)And is willing to ignore the needs of the people in order to strip us of our freedoms?
Sounds like a real winner there.
Reasonable_Argument
(881 posts)But I think they'd be better served getting a therapist to get over their fear instead of trying to strip others of their rights.
HALO141
(911 posts)I give it a great, big
MEH
shadowrider
(4,941 posts)I choose...
pfffffft..
virginia mountainman
(5,046 posts)They are mostly in New York, Chicago, Boston and parts of California.
Because those are just about the ONLY areas that sort of thing, is put up with by the voters.
hack89
(39,171 posts)TPaine7
(4,286 posts)There, fixed it for you.
That's going to be tough, for obvious reasons, but that's the real challenge for gun control.
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)They just don't get it.