Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 11:40 AM Sep 2012

Law could discourage "straw buyers" of guns

One way to fight back against "straw buyers" who flood Chicago with guns is a "lost or stolen" law, Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez says.

At a press conference last week, Alvarez talked about the law when asked about a Sun-Times series by Frank Main that documented how straw buyers purchase guns legally in the suburbs and then sell them to people who use the weapons in crimes in Chicago. If the gun is traced back, the straw buyer says it was lost or stolen.

"We have the past three years proposed a law down in Springfield called 'lost or stolen,' " Alvarez said. "I think it is a very common-sense law, and obviously it has gone nowhere down in Springfield."

By requiring a gun owner to report a lost or stolen gun within 72 hours of noticing it is missing, the law would discourage straw purchases, Alvarez said.

http://blogs.suntimes.com/backtalk/2012/09/i_know_there_is_no.html
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Law could discourage "straw buyers" of guns (Original Post) SecularMotion Sep 2012 OP
"...noticing it was missing..." rrneck Sep 2012 #1
are they going to pawn shops? gejohnston Sep 2012 #2
Isn't straw purchasing being a FEDERAL FELONY enough of an deterrent?? virginia mountainman Sep 2012 #3
The incredible MYTH... discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2012 #4
"anti-rights controllers" SecularMotion Sep 2012 #5
Thanks discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2012 #10
Thanks for the bigotry SecularMotion Sep 2012 #11
Maybe... discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2012 #17
You're saying the law would be useless because gun owners are dishonest? SecularMotion Sep 2012 #6
No Reasonable_Argument Sep 2012 #7
Let the mountainman speak for himself SecularMotion Sep 2012 #8
I believe you're the one misinterpreting his post nt Reasonable_Argument Sep 2012 #9
Read this slowly SecularMotion Sep 2012 #12
The other criminal ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #13
since we are talking about straw purchasers, gejohnston Sep 2012 #14
The criminal. Clames Sep 2012 #15
How would the district attorney make that distinction? nt rrneck Sep 2012 #16
I guess I should have typed it slower.. virginia mountainman Sep 2012 #19
OT question... discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2012 #18
Illinois has an FOID card krispos42 Sep 2012 #20

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
2. are they going to pawn shops?
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 12:15 PM
Sep 2012

the average crime gun in Illinois is about 12 years old, 11 years old national average. Does the state require FOID numbers be fed into a database when they buy from an FFL? It seems to me that they could use the data to look for trends that would single out those individuals, and turn that evidence over to the ATF for further investigation.

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
3. Isn't straw purchasing being a FEDERAL FELONY enough of an deterrent??
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 01:58 PM
Sep 2012

Adding more laws is nothing more than harassment, especially one that would be simple to evade by saying..

"Officer, you found MY GUN?!? How could that be it is safely locked away in the back of my "closet/safe" and has been for years?!


That is even easier to evade than taking a file and obliterating micro stamping, that at least takes a minute or two to do.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
4. The incredible MYTH...
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 02:24 PM
Sep 2012

...that the anti-rights controllers fall for is that a law can effect control.

Someone once told me that it is impossible to for a private citizen to get on a 757 with a loaded gun and fly to another city. I said it is certainly possible and there is absolutely no law against it. One does need to buy or rent the plane first but it's quite possible.

The same fellow then rephrased his claim and said that it is impossible for a private citizen to get on a publicly available commercial 757 with a loaded gun. I said it was possible but that you would need to bring plenty of ammo and be able to reload very quickly since you'd likely have to fire that gun often in order to make it as far as the plane.

Those determined to commit a criminal act will not be deterred by a law. Laws serve as criteria to convict those overtly evil among us. Thus gun control is not about guns; it's about control; further it's about who will be controlled.

 
7. No
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:42 PM
Sep 2012

He's saying that criminals who engage in straw purchases would simply lie. Funny how criminals tend to break the law.

 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
12. Read this slowly
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 04:43 PM
Sep 2012
Adding more laws is nothing more than harassment, especially one that would be simple to evade saying

"Officer, you found MY GUN?!? How could that be it is safely locked away in the back of my "closet/safe" and has been for years?!


Now who is evading the law here the gun owner or the criminal?

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
13. The other criminal
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 05:00 PM
Sep 2012

If it was a straw purchase, the gun purchaser is also a criminal since they have violated the law

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
14. since we are talking about straw purchasers,
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 05:11 PM
Sep 2012

Last edited Sun Sep 9, 2012, 07:21 PM - Edit history (1)

it would be a criminal possibly trying to beat a federal rap. Straw purchasing is a federal crime under Gun Control Act of 1968. By definition, committing a crime makes you a criminal. I think a better idea would be for each pistol purchase to be fed into a state computer along with the FOID number, if there are unusual trends, that information would go to the ATF for investigation. It would not be a registration system, it would say "this guy bought a pistol". Since Illinois has a licensing scheme, they should at least use it for something, since the Brady Bill made it kind of redundant.

Under the GCA, multiple pistol purchases at the same place, the dealer sends a form to the ATF, like what has been proposed for some rifles on the border states. But if you are a smart straw buyer, you go to five different dealers that day instead of buying five from the same place.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_purchase#Firearms
http://www.dontlie.org/FAQ.cfm

I think a better idea would be for the feds to change the sentencing guidelines for straw purchasers from a couple of months to more than a couple of years.

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
19. I guess I should have typed it slower..
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 08:10 PM
Sep 2012

I am no miracle worker, but only one person is having trouble with my post.

WATER...WAAAAAATER......WATER....................WAAAAAAATER.............

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
18. OT question...
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 07:38 PM
Sep 2012

...just for fun and information, maybe you could add something to the text of the subject line of future OPs that would let the rest of us know whether you were considering participating downthread at all.

Just a thought.

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
20. Illinois has an FOID card
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 10:15 AM
Sep 2012

Firearm Owner Identification card. Seems to me that, since in Illinois you have to prove your right to own a gun to the police, then it would be a relatively simple matter to make a law saying that you can only sell a gun to another person that has an FOID card. Else, jail time.

Or they, as the state government, can require that all firearms transactions go through an FFL.

Or they can re-legalize pot.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Law could discourage &quo...