Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
U.S. wants Afghanistan to sign security deal in 'weeks not months'
Source: Reuters
U.S. wants Afghanistan to sign security deal in 'weeks not months'
WASHINGTON Mon Jan 6, 2014 3:15pm EST
(Reuters) - The United States wants the Afghanistan government to sign a bilateral security agreement in matter of weeks if a contingent of U.S. troops is to remain there after 2014, the White House said on Monday.
The Afghan government had ignored U.S. demands for it to sign a framework security agreement by the end of 2013, after protracted negotiations that have strained relations between the two countries.
U.S. officials say unless a deal is reached to keep upwards of 8,000 U.S. troops inside the country after 2014, the United States might instead completely withdraw from the country.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
"Our position continues to be that if we cannot conclude a bilateral security agreement promptly, then we will be forced to initiate planning for a post-2014 future in which there would be no U.S. or NATO troop presence in Afghanistan," White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
WASHINGTON Mon Jan 6, 2014 3:15pm EST
(Reuters) - The United States wants the Afghanistan government to sign a bilateral security agreement in matter of weeks if a contingent of U.S. troops is to remain there after 2014, the White House said on Monday.
The Afghan government had ignored U.S. demands for it to sign a framework security agreement by the end of 2013, after protracted negotiations that have strained relations between the two countries.
U.S. officials say unless a deal is reached to keep upwards of 8,000 U.S. troops inside the country after 2014, the United States might instead completely withdraw from the country.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
"Our position continues to be that if we cannot conclude a bilateral security agreement promptly, then we will be forced to initiate planning for a post-2014 future in which there would be no U.S. or NATO troop presence in Afghanistan," White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/06/us-afghanistan-usa-idUSBREA050Z520140106
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 723 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. wants Afghanistan to sign security deal in 'weeks not months' (Original Post)
Eugene
Jan 2014
OP
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)1. But But But, If we withdraw who will fund the insurgents? There will not be anyone to provide arms
and munitions to all sides.
Oh the Humanity!
bemildred
(90,061 posts)2. You can't always get what you want. nt
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)3. I can only assume
there's something about dream on they don't quite grasp
unhappycamper
(60,364 posts)4. If you can't do it thirteen years, declare victory an leave. n/t