Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

douglas9

(4,358 posts)
Mon May 27, 2019, 09:26 AM May 2019

The Navy's Obsession With Damage Control

At first, the 2014 crash of a U.S. Navy helicopter off the coast of Virginia seemed like an unfortunate—but nevertheless fairly routine—training accident.

But after reading Navy investigative reports, meeting with sources, and speaking with colleagues who’d been researching the case, my team and I quickly realized that there was more to it. The crash was a symptom of much deeper problems related to how the Pentagon works, and it was clear that we needed to bring these problems to light.

And so after nearly three years of production, involving dozens of interviews, more than 50 public-records requests, and more than 150 hours of footage shot, the investigative documentary Who Killed Lt. Van Dorn? finally screened for the public in October 2018.

The film investigates the death of Wesley Van Dorn, a widely revered Naval Academy graduate and pilot. On January 8, 2014, he was killed in a training mission when the MH-53E Sea Dragon helicopter he was flying plunged into the Atlantic after a fire broke out on board. The film digs into the causes of the crash and, through the experience of ordinary sailors and marines, raises questions about the defense establishment and the Pentagon’s priorities.

I produced the film at the Investigative Reporting Program at UC Berkeley. It was the culmination of a four-and-a-half-year reporting effort that included collaborations with The Virginian-Pilot, NBC News, and Honolulu Civil Beat.

Our reporting revealed that the Navy knew about safety issues on the helicopter and leadership problems in its squadrons, but was slow to do anything about them. We found that 132 people have died on the Navy and Marine versions of this helicopter in the past 35 years, despite it never being shot down in combat. The 53E is the deadliest aircraft in the military.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/05/naval-officers-internal-emails-show-attitudes-toward-press/588817/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Navy's Obsession With Damage Control (Original Post) douglas9 May 2019 OP
There are two kinds of damage control. One kind is a system set up to detect and deal with problems Nitram May 2019 #1

Nitram

(22,794 posts)
1. There are two kinds of damage control. One kind is a system set up to detect and deal with problems
Mon May 27, 2019, 10:59 AM
May 2019

with military equipment, communication, training, tactics, strategy, and the command structure. The other kind of "damage control" is what the OP is addressing - a tendency to cover up problems in those areas to avoid criticism and embarrassment for the military. That kind of cover up makes the first kind of damage control very difficult to carry out.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Veterans»The Navy's Obsession With...