50 Very Bad Book Covers for Literary Classics

[muriel_volestrangler]

Sometimes they're horribly literal:



sometimes a single word in a title has triggered a thought in someone clearly on a deadline but who has no idea what the book is about:



and sometimes they just appear to be a random image:



https://lithub.com/50-very-bad-book-covers-for-literary-classics/

[Goonch]

1. ;-{)

[Ponietz]

2. Outstanding! Big rec!

[Karadeniz]

3. No excuses for such ignorance... But fun to be shocked!

[hermetic]

4. Too funny

Raises some questions. Does every publisher reprint the classics, just because they can? Every five years? I mean, there was just so many of them.