Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:34 PM Dec 2013

There is no difference in religious fundamentalism between American Muslims and Christians

This is a guest post by Rachel Gillum, a PhD Candidate at Stanford University.



Graph by Rachel Gillum, The Monkey Cage

By Rachel Gillum
December 16 at 12:22 pm

Religious fundamentalism among Muslim immigrants in Western Europe is dramatically greater than that among Christian Europeans, according to a recent study by Ruud Koopmans from the Wissenschaftszentrum in Berlin discussed on the Monkey Cage last Friday. On the surface, these findings legitimize concerns surrounding the incompatibility of Western and Islamic values.

Like Europeans, Americans express fear over Muslim integration and Islamic fundamentalism, although very little is known about beliefs among Muslims living in the U.S. A recent nationwide survey of U.S. Muslims, which I designed, provides some insight — the Muslim-American National Opinion Survey (MANOS) reveals that levels of religious fundamentalism among Muslims and Christians in the U.S. are nearly identical.

As one of the few nationally representative surveys available of Muslim Americans, MANOS provides insight into the degree Muslim Americans hold fundamentalist views, as defined by Koopmans. Data from existing surveys of the general American population allow me to assess where Muslims stand relative to other Americans in believing that religious rules are more important than the laws of the country and the degree individuals hold literal interpretations of holy scriptures.

Results from MANOS and the General Social Surveys reveal that the general American population holds nearly identical levels of fundamentalist beliefs as Muslims, if not slightly more. Just over 57 percent of the general American population believes that “right and wrong in U.S. law should be based on God’s laws,” compared to 49.3 percent of U.S.-born Muslims and 45.6 of foreign-born Muslims. About a third of each group believes that society should not be the one to determine right and wrong in U.S. law. Such numbers reveal that the general American population is more fundamentalist than the average European, and that Muslim Americans are less fundamentalist than European Muslims, according to the Koopmans study.



Graph by Rachel Gillum, The Monkey Cage

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2013/12/16/no-difference-in-religious-fundamentalism-between-american-muslims-and-christians/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2013/12/13/how-widespread-is-islamic-fundamentalism-in-western-europe/

http://www.rachelgillum.com/muslim-american-national-opinion-survey.html

http://www.pewforum.org/2008/06/01/u-s-religious-landscape-survey-religious-beliefs-and-practices/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There is no difference in religious fundamentalism between American Muslims and Christians (Original Post) rug Dec 2013 OP
:/ GladRagDahl Dec 2013 #1
I take it you read the links in her article in five minutes. rug Dec 2013 #4
Nope GladRagDahl Dec 2013 #5
She did. She documented her work. rug Dec 2013 #6
There is no work GladRagDahl Dec 2013 #7
You are generous with your pity. rug Dec 2013 #8
Fundamentalists put Jesus on the cross . orpupilofnature57 Dec 2013 #2
Fundamentalist Romans? GladRagDahl Dec 2013 #3
 

GladRagDahl

(237 posts)
1. :/
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:39 PM
Dec 2013

Well, that was a waste of reading time. It looks like something a high schooler would write as the assertion is massive and the reality of her "facts" are pretty thin. Just because both believe their religious text of choice is the "voice of god" and that "right and wrong should be based on god's laws" doesn't prove her assertion. I hope she does considerably better with her doctoral thesis -- whatever it happens to be.

 

GladRagDahl

(237 posts)
5. Nope
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 08:37 PM
Dec 2013

As a rule, I find it pointless to read links which are just willy-nilly attached to the end of an article. If the author can't make his/her point in their own work, I see no need to go reference articles which are not cited specifically. It's not MY assertion. It's not MY job to prove HER point.

 

GladRagDahl

(237 posts)
7. There is no work
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 09:44 PM
Dec 2013

Seriously -- I don't think I would have given it a passing grade for high school level. Very sad that she's a doctoral candidate.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»There is no difference in...