If Jesus Had a Wife, Would it Change the GOP War on Women?

[eridani]

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/23105-if-jesus-had-a-wife-would-it-change-the-gop-war-on-women

A Coptic fragmentary manuscript page that dates back to a few hundred years after Jesus’ death (and the text of which may go back to the second century) has been found by radiocarbon and ink testing to be authentic. That is, it is not, as some scholars claimed when it was first announced by Harvard scholar Karen King, a modern forgery.

Of course, that it is ancient does not require that it be correct.

But if it were correct, how might it change Christian sensibilities? For a holy figure to have a wife does not make the tradition more feminist, after all. The Jewish patriarchs and prophets were married, but Orthodox and Haredi Judaism are highly patriarchal. Likewise Islam, where the Prophet Muhammad (like Abraham and David) had several wives.

On the other hand, the text itself seems to be a pro-woman polemic defending the idea that women can be disciples of Christ even if married (Jesus is depicted as saying his wife is a disciple).

If Christian tradition were broadened to include these perspectives, it might help it escape the misogyny of some authors. For instance, the entire pyramidal structure erected by Paul in 1 Corinthians 11:3 might be difficult to maintain: “But I want you to understand that the head [kephale] of every man is Christ, the head of a woman is her husband, and the head of Christ is God.” But if Christ had a wife, the relationships wouldn’t be hierarchical like that. The man-wife dyad would obtain both at the level of Jesus and at the level of the believers. And if Paul thought he could keep women quiet in church, he had another think coming, especially if Mrs. Jesus could have had anything to say about it.

It seems to me that much of the evangelical (and evangelical-Catholic) wing of the current Republican Party has 1 Corinthians 11:3 in mind when they think about social structure. God and Jesus are most proximate to men, and women come later in the hierarchy. Thus, “godly” men (as they conceive themselves) get to tell women what they can do with their bodies, whether they must bear their rapist’s child, whether they have access to birth control from government health insurance programs

[muriel_volestrangler]

1. No, they'd use it to say it was OK to paint women out of the picture

They'd say "see? A wife is just a small detail of a man's life. Be like Jesus - keep her in the background, and don't even tell anyone her name".

[Dorian Gray]

4. I agree

that it won't change, and maybe you're on to something. I think it has more to do with ingrained societal attitudes needing to be changed, though. And I don't know how to start with a systemic change throughout multiple societies.

What I am sure of, however, is that this text will be denied by all the major religious authorities.

[Turbineguy]

2. What?

And just walk away from all that hate? Highly unlikely. No, she'd be "barefoot, pregnant and in the kitchen" too

[katmondoo]

3. Never, They would just go after Jesus