Religion
Related: About this forumAnonymous Hackers Attack Christian Websites, Declare 'Religion Sucks LOL'
By Jacob Kleinman
March 2, 2012 2:51 PM EST
Calling it a "sickness to this world," members of the formless 'hacktivist' group of computer programmers known as Anonymous declared war on religion on Friday, March 2, hacking the websites of three Christian organizations all based in and around Charlotte, North Carolina. The homepages for Bethel Outreach International Church, Charlotte International Church, and Crossfire Ministries were all replaced with the 30-minute long YouTube video, "Richard Dawkins: An Atheist's Call to Arms," and an informal declaration of war, with the title, "religion sucks lol [laugh out loud]."
The attack was announced by Twitter account @AnonymousIRC to its 276,783 followers. IRC (Internet Relay Chat) is one of the several online social platforms that Anonymous uses to congregate and make plans, along with Facebook and Twitter. The first tweet, sent out at around 10 am EST read, "http://www.betheloic.org HACKED Reason:religious idiocy and foh dah lulz #Anonymous #AntiSec #OWS #ROOTED #DAWKINS." WRITER'S TRANSLATION: "The website www.betheloic.org has been hacked. The reason being the idociy of religion and because attacking them makes us laugh." Two tweets followed moments later with the same message, except for the name of the website that Anonymous had hacked, most likely with a proxy DDoS spam attack.
The video that Anonymous posted on each hacked site is a 31-minute speech by famous atheist Richard Dawkins, in which he told his fellow atheists not to hide their beliefs, and to fight against "the incursion of religion into politics and education."
This Friday's attacks are a continuation of Anonymous hacktivist's plan to launch online attacks against their perceived enemies once a week. Last Friday, Anonymous hackers took down several FBI affiliated website, including the Dayton, Ohio branch of InfraGard.
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/308264/20120302/anonymous-hackers-religion-website-proxy-twitter.htm
Classy.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)FWIW, the third one is a "sports ministry", which is a new one to me.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Mess with people. And they do it very well. Hopefully the churches just turn the other cheek and walk away rather than poking the alligator. Gene Simmons can tell you that isn't a good idea.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)we're subjected to on a daily basis. Every time I drive down certain streets I see stupid signs on churches telling me I need to believe in the great sky man and his "son" who (was apparently obtained by deity-on-mortal rape) or I will perish. Some Bible thumpers came to our door yesterday (a young boy was in the group -- good strategy on their part, otherwise they would have heard an earful). I've never had an atheist knock on my door.
So, this is a little pushback. It's good for people to be exposed to other ways of thinking, right?
Kurmudgeon
(1,751 posts)Someone knocked on your door, so it's time for some "pushback"?
Drop in the bucket indeed.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)If pushing beliefs on others is no big deal, then this should be no big deal to you.
Kurmudgeon
(1,751 posts)I said nothing about a website hack, so don't assume or say that I would be ok with it something I haven't even seen.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)YES!!! BTW, you are an anti-woman religious freak!!!
Don't let the door hit your religiously insane ass on your way out!!!
2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)deacon_sephiroth
(731 posts)but it made me laugh
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)But I just came here to gloat.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)He basically called people who choose abortion baby killers just one too many times.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)That one thread was the last straw.
laconicsax
(14,860 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)While there are certain positions that are clear TOS violations (being against gay marriage, for one), the issue of being pro or anti choice has been much less clear.
In general, the admins have taken the position that members can hold anti-abortion positions and that is not bannable.
However, in this case, he just finally tipped the jar over with the kind of language he was using.
Admin was aware of him and it is they who actually did the final ban.
laconicsax
(14,860 posts)It bothers me that one of them was able to brand people as murderers for exercising control over their bodies.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)It was really not in the purview of MIRT to take him out, so the administrators pulled the trigger when they had had enough.
deacon_sephiroth
(731 posts)I don't feel bad for laughing anymore.
dmallind
(10,437 posts)They should not be doing this. No excuses, no equivocation (boy it would be nice if attacks on nonbelievers got that reaction, but hey). Hacking into and defacing websites is always wrong, unless they are committing crimes themselves which is not the case here. I had no idea of this group's opinion on belief, and both had and have no interest or support in them expressing it this way.
napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)With seemingly divergent causes. If Anonymous were a guy I knew, I'd warn him to check his credit report.
deacon_sephiroth
(731 posts)Religion DOES suck...