Religion
Related: About this forumJesus may have been a hermaphrodite, claims academic
Dr Cornwall, of Manchester Universitys Lincoln Theological Institute, describes herself on her blog as specialising in: Research and writing in feminist theology, sexuality, gender, embodiment, ethics and other fun things like that.
In her paper Intersex & Ontology, A Response to The Church, Women Bishops and Provision, she argues that it is not possible to know with any certainty that Jesus did not suffer from an intersex condition, with both male and female organs.
In an extraordinary paper she says: It is not possible to assert with any degree of certainty that Jesus was male as we now define maleness.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/9116974/Jesus-may-have-been-a-hermaphrodite-claims-academic.html
A bit more reading at the link...
dmallind
(10,437 posts)can have a case made for it. It's still utterly baseless - like asking how much Romeo weighed or whether King Arthur was circumcised. Because the stories about the same character don't mesh perfectly because of the disparate nature of the storytellers, just about any wild speculation can be indulged.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)before moving on to the creative guesses.
Oh, wait. Jesus' existence is also a creative guess.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)to assert with any degree of certainty that Jesus was not an extraterrestial being as we now define extraterrestial. Academic overreach reaching the point of silliness, chasing itself down a rabbit hole of its own invention.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Parthenogenesis produces females.
dmallind
(10,437 posts)to change gender as population demands it. Even a parthogenically produced messiah could then adopt male traits.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Besides, axolotls are a species with female heterogamety.
Interestingly a female ZW converted to a male can be bred with a normal female ZW to produce a 3 to 1 ratio of females to males (a ZZ male, two ZW females, a WW female which does not normally occur.).
Amphibian sex determination and sex reversal
http://vipersgarden.at/PDF_files/PDF-1355.pdf
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)My impression of him from the legends is more along the lines of his being a "whipper-snapper."
I prefer to see such "scientific mistakes' in western scripture as indicators of the limitations of knowledge and culture at the time the legends were codified.
The discovery of chromosomes is only about 150 years old. Clearly the weavers of Jesus legends hadn't a clue about chromosomes. And they lived in a place where the contemporary culture called for a male demigod rather than an incarnation of an earth-mother.
Imagine how both sides would be thinking if--without knowledge of chromosomes--the original stories had been about a virgin that produced a demigoddess?
laconicsax
(14,860 posts)Parthenogenesis in XY species results in female offspring. There's no way around it.
The "scientific mistakes" in scripture are indications that it is BOTH the result of limited knowledge AND not true.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Unfortunately regarding the truth, you and I feel that way, but fundamentalists aren't constrained by mere rules of nature.
They have an 'wild card' that allows them to ignore the constraints of nature: the infinite capacity of an omnipotent deity.
WingDinger
(3,690 posts)So, got his birth cert in hawaii. He was a closet Muslim{hermaphrodite, that never had a gender check}. As he was born in a manger. Certainly, they could have slipped a fake phallus in at the Bris.
There is sparse corroboration of Jesus even existing in the flesh, let alone his junk.
laconicsax
(14,860 posts)First,
Second, this could explain why Jesus was named "Jesus" and not "Emmanuel" as the passage in Isaiah that supposedly prophesies him claims. The kid's born, and upon seeing what would be a very unfamiliar, unknown, and unexpected condition, the parents exclaimed "Jesus Christ!" and the name stuck.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)My guess is he worked for a Hispanic?
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)Iggo
(47,571 posts)But I doubt it.