Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumAll religions propagate the same message
Fortunately, we dont have any serious religious fundamentalism to deal with in Sri Lanka, except a nascent form of it being introduced to the country by a handful of marginal, foreign funded Christian and Muslim zealots who enjoy no popularity among the mainstream believers of the two respective faiths. Though a few similarly isolated, apparently misguided Buddhist monks seem to have started a violent, aberrational reaction against attempted fundamentalist inroads into the local Buddhist fold, while being censured by the average Buddhists themselves, have only succeeded in having the fundamentalist cap thrust on their own heads. These may be set aside as temporary misadventures.
But whatever religious faith we belong to, or whether or not we profess any such faith, we are all being imperilled by a virulent kind of global religious fundamentalism that is undermining the very foundations of human civilization. Neuroscientist Dr Sam Harriss slim volume, New York Times bestseller, Letter to a Christian nation (2006) deals with what he describes as a moral and intellectual emergency facing his nation (America) in the form of a potentially self-destructive and violent religious fanaticism resulting from blind faith in religious dogma. He is careful to tell us that though the book is addressed to Christians in the United States, it is intended for people of all faiths. It presents a well argued case against all forms of doctrinaire religion. Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, well known for his active involvement in an educational moral campaign against irrational religious faith, writes a persuasive foreword to the book.
Harris identifies the respect we accord religious faith as an impediment to any intellectually honest, rational discourse on morals, spirituality, and the problem of human suffering. These can be addressed through a rational scientific approach with relative ease, but religion stands in its way. We like to believe that all religions propagate the same message to humanity without contradiction: love your neighbour, avoid violence, live a moral life, etc. But the truth is that strict adherence to the articles of faith found in one religion often alienates individuals and whole groups from fellow human beings who happen to profess a different religion. It is traditionally claimed that religious tolerance is an antidote to communal disharmony based on religion. The problem is that tolerance could be incompatible with being faithful to ones own religion if it insists on being fundamentalist (in the sense in which the word was originally used in America around the beginning of the twentieth century). This once innocuous concept shed its original harmless associations of scriptural authenticity, purity, etc at least some forty or fifty years ago, and has now acquired very negative connotations. Today fundamentalism is a heavily loaded word in both religious and secular contexts. Any movement that is prone to violent ideologies and practices tends to be dubbed fundamentalist.
Yet religions are not usually accused of deliberately preaching violence even by the faithful of rival (i.e. other) religions. Silence is always maintained on this point as demanded by mutual awareness of vulnerability to the same charge and the need for feigned religious tolerance. Sectarianism in the interpretation of the dogmas of the same faith often divides its adherents, and this leads to internecine conflicts.
http://www.nation.lk/edition/lens/item/31880-all-religions-propagate-the-same-message.html
But whatever religious faith we belong to, or whether or not we profess any such faith, we are all being imperilled by a virulent kind of global religious fundamentalism that is undermining the very foundations of human civilization. Neuroscientist Dr Sam Harriss slim volume, New York Times bestseller, Letter to a Christian nation (2006) deals with what he describes as a moral and intellectual emergency facing his nation (America) in the form of a potentially self-destructive and violent religious fanaticism resulting from blind faith in religious dogma. He is careful to tell us that though the book is addressed to Christians in the United States, it is intended for people of all faiths. It presents a well argued case against all forms of doctrinaire religion. Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, well known for his active involvement in an educational moral campaign against irrational religious faith, writes a persuasive foreword to the book.
Harris identifies the respect we accord religious faith as an impediment to any intellectually honest, rational discourse on morals, spirituality, and the problem of human suffering. These can be addressed through a rational scientific approach with relative ease, but religion stands in its way. We like to believe that all religions propagate the same message to humanity without contradiction: love your neighbour, avoid violence, live a moral life, etc. But the truth is that strict adherence to the articles of faith found in one religion often alienates individuals and whole groups from fellow human beings who happen to profess a different religion. It is traditionally claimed that religious tolerance is an antidote to communal disharmony based on religion. The problem is that tolerance could be incompatible with being faithful to ones own religion if it insists on being fundamentalist (in the sense in which the word was originally used in America around the beginning of the twentieth century). This once innocuous concept shed its original harmless associations of scriptural authenticity, purity, etc at least some forty or fifty years ago, and has now acquired very negative connotations. Today fundamentalism is a heavily loaded word in both religious and secular contexts. Any movement that is prone to violent ideologies and practices tends to be dubbed fundamentalist.
Yet religions are not usually accused of deliberately preaching violence even by the faithful of rival (i.e. other) religions. Silence is always maintained on this point as demanded by mutual awareness of vulnerability to the same charge and the need for feigned religious tolerance. Sectarianism in the interpretation of the dogmas of the same faith often divides its adherents, and this leads to internecine conflicts.
http://www.nation.lk/edition/lens/item/31880-all-religions-propagate-the-same-message.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 735 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post