Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumA Christian Apologist and an Atheist Thrive in an Improbable Bond
Patrick Arsenault, left, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Pennsylvania and an atheist, was an editor of a religious book by his friend David Skeel, a Penn law professor and a Christian. (Credit Mark Makela for The New York Times)
OCT. 3, 2014
By SAMUEL G. FREEDMAN
PHILADELPHIA One morning in February 2012, Prof. David Skeel received an email from a stranger named Patrick Arsenault. The message contained a thumbnail photo of the equation for calculating kinetic energy, and the signature line identified the writer as a postdoctoral fellow at the medical school of the University of Pennsylvania. All of which gave Professor Skeel cause for curiosity.
The previous night, he had moderated a public conversation with John C. Lennox, an Oxford mathematician and committed Christian. The event was meant to show that faith and reason could be reconciled, not exactly an easy sell on campuses these days, and for his part, Professor Skeel was less a neutral facilitator than a partisan.
While his scholarly specialties at Penns law school were bankruptcy and corporate regulation, his spiritual life as a devoted Christian formed a significant part of his public profile. In both academic journals and op-ed essays, he advocated for the fruitful interaction of religion and law, exactly the kind of position that his foes saw as undermining the separation of church and state.
To use the theological term, Professor Skeel was a Christian apologist, one who explains and defends the faith against doubters. Dr. Arsenault was an atheist, as he explained in the email, who had attended the public discussion with his own humanist loyalties. Yet he wrote that he appreciated Professor Skeel for choosing to pose the big difficult questions of Christianity. The next day, Professor Skeel sent a note suggesting they have coffee and talk.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/04/us/a-christian-apologist-and-an-atheist-thrive-in-an-improbable-bond.html?_r=0
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 906 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Christian Apologist and an Atheist Thrive in an Improbable Bond (Original Post)
rug
Oct 2014
OP
Jim__
(14,035 posts)1. I think this is the video of the discussion between David Skeel and John Lennox
&feature=player_detailpage
rug
(82,333 posts)2. Thanks for finding that.