Religion
Related: About this forum1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
That is the estimate of how many stars there are in the Universe. There are probably 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 planets.
Something to think about through the lens of your beliefs or non beliefs.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)That is indeed something to think about through the lens of your belief or non-believ.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Just because there are a lot of stars doesn't mean the the set of what is possible changes.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)...and keep going...
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)We're the BEST. USA! USA! USA!
God wouldn't play tricks on us.
edhopper
(33,579 posts)that is my favorite spot on earth.
Everyone has their special backwater place.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Maybe we share the same place. What would be the possibility of that happening?
edhopper
(33,579 posts)of idyllic Italian villages, etc...
cbayer
(146,218 posts)I will be living there again this summer. Maybe we will run into each other.
edhopper
(33,579 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)edhopper
(33,579 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)bobalew
(321 posts)How many with Planets in the galactic "Goldilocks Zones", Who is to say? Maybe 2 or 3 magnitudes less, it's still a staggering number, nonetheless. It allows for a rather large statistical possibility of places exactly like ours scattered all about the universe. Even at billions of galaxy & maybe only 2 planets like ours, per unit is a giant number, and that's being very conservative, the only instance of that i even think of allowing.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Lots of stars and planets means there is a god. Lots of planets and stars means random expansion and there is no god.
Or does it mean lots of stars and planets and we can't prove either side is right.
edhopper
(33,579 posts)I wasn't making a point, just starting a thread.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)where you are without relating your existence to anything else.
Or how were you born with out relating to anyone else.
Dependent origination is something I think about a lot.
Nothing happens without something else happening first.
edhopper
(33,579 posts)are you trying to make a case for a divine origin to the Universe?
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)It just increases the likelihood that each element within the set of the possible exists somewhere.
safeinOhio
(32,676 posts)in this dimension.
rurallib
(62,414 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)I'm not sure that you and I have the same understanding of "dimension".
Dorian Gray
(13,493 posts)vast. Amazing. Awe-inspiring.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)It's a lack of a lens.
edhopper
(33,579 posts)but not believing an deity or any supernatural component to the Universe does affect the way you see it.
That lens.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)edhopper
(33,579 posts)Naturalistic way will still evoke emotions from that viewpoint.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)edhopper
(33,579 posts)Of the Universe have an impact on you? Does it evoke any feelings?
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Hope for the vast array of interesting new things out there we've never seen. Disappointment that I'll never go see them. Hope, fear, clarity, confusion.
The universe is vast and old enough, trying to grok it pretty much evokes all possible emotions simultaneously.
I don't know how that would be different from a believer, except, a filter of religious certainty might skew the array of emotions one direction or another.
edhopper
(33,579 posts)it was the start of a discussion, not a statement.
In the context of this forum, I can see the reasons people respond to this as both confirming there is a God and that there is not one.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Not unless the age/vastness of the universe speaks to the requirement of a designer/mind. Which it does not appear to.
If in the end we find the universe can't exist without a designer, then the number of planets, specifically, isn't relevant. The designer could be required if there was one sun, or centillions.
TheBlackAdder
(28,193 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)You should know that much physiology.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)an external optic, not the lens of your eyeball. It means "from the perspective of", or "filtered by". For example "through the lens of bitter caustic snark".
edhopper
(33,579 posts)Exactly
okasha
(11,573 posts)would be "filter," as in "through the filter of gunnuttery."
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)"through the lens". You can google it. I surprised at your ignorance. Usually you are pretty much expert on everything under the sun.
okasha
(11,573 posts)Now, where did you say you obtained your Ph. D. In Wikipedia Studies?
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Your snark and insults are inappropriate. But then again, you pal around with someone who calls other human beings "vermin" for simply having a different opinion, so I guess it's to be expected.
edhopper
(33,579 posts)that that was the right reading of the metaphor.
Or don't you know the origins?
1 Corinthians 13:12
12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)pinto
(106,886 posts)W. Shakespeare
- Hamlet (1.5.167-8), Hamlet to Horatio
edhopper
(33,579 posts)That quote is always used for the other fella's "philosophy".
pinto
(106,886 posts)There's so much that we don't know out there and all around us. Accepting that has a lot of value, imo. Absolutism in any venue seems a roadblock to me.
edhopper
(33,579 posts)NeoGreen
(4,031 posts)...
There are almost 10^24 water molecules in a shot glass full of water (@35ml/shot glass).
Give or take a few trillion.
delrem
(9,688 posts)Nothing else except that conclusion makes sense.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)Isn't even directly detectable yet.
And on top of that, there might be more universes.
That's what blows my mind.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)oh, and stop masturbating too.
edhopper
(33,579 posts)he only talked to people in a small corner of the Middle East in the Iron Age.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)I have spent many moonless nights, under clear skies, hundreds of miles from land, staring for hours on end at that vast blanket of stars, in absolute wonderment.
Interestingly, the idea of a deity rarely, if ever, enters my mind. There is also this mountain in Umbria that brings back so many memories of shooting stars on August nights.
edhopper
(33,579 posts)the more the quote "Your God is too small" in reference to the God most of the monotheistic believers worship makes sense.
But I'm with you, in that I rarely think about any deity when pondering the scope of Universe.