Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

edhopper

(33,579 posts)
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 03:31 PM Apr 2015

1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

That is the estimate of how many stars there are in the Universe. There are probably 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 planets.

Something to think about through the lens of your beliefs or non beliefs.

56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (Original Post) edhopper Apr 2015 OP
The possibilities of what may out there approach the infinite. cbayer Apr 2015 #1
oh wait, you are promoting theology based on there being lots of stars. Warren Stupidity Apr 2015 #8
False equivalence. AtheistCrusader Apr 2015 #12
Or else they reach the infinite... stone space Apr 2015 #16
A concept which I can't get my head around at all. cbayer Apr 2015 #19
But, But, But... Politicalboi Apr 2015 #2
There is a little village in Italy edhopper Apr 2015 #3
I have one there as well. cbayer Apr 2015 #6
We would have to divide the number edhopper Apr 2015 #11
And they are countless. cbayer Apr 2015 #15
I won't be in Italy this year edhopper Apr 2015 #21
I will eat for you. cbayer Apr 2015 #26
lots of gelato please. edhopper Apr 2015 #32
Deal. Every time I get myself one, I will get one for you. cbayer Apr 2015 #34
yum edhopper Apr 2015 #35
An Octillion or more. bobalew Apr 2015 #4
I don't get it? upaloopa Apr 2015 #5
Just a fact that can lead to interesting thoughts edhopper Apr 2015 #10
Ok thanks. In that vein try to describe to a person upaloopa Apr 2015 #17
I don't get it edhopper Apr 2015 #22
The number of stars and planets does not alter the set of what is possible. Warren Stupidity Apr 2015 #36
and that's only safeinOhio Apr 2015 #7
or in the 'known' universe rurallib Apr 2015 #29
So there are other stars that exist only in the "other" dimension? Warren Stupidity Apr 2015 #37
It's Dorian Gray Apr 2015 #9
Non-belief isn't a lens. AtheistCrusader Apr 2015 #13
True edhopper Apr 2015 #23
See it as it is, rather than with a filter? AtheistCrusader Apr 2015 #25
but seeing it in a completely edhopper Apr 2015 #33
I don't know what you mean. AtheistCrusader Apr 2015 #38
does the sheer vastness edhopper Apr 2015 #40
Lots of feelings. AtheistCrusader Apr 2015 #47
That's all I'm saying edhopper Apr 2015 #48
I don't think it's relevant to the question of whether there are or are not god(s). AtheistCrusader Apr 2015 #49
Bingo! TheBlackAdder Apr 2015 #28
No lens=blind. okasha Apr 2015 #30
Actually in this case the "lens" referred to is, in the metaphor, Warren Stupidity Apr 2015 #39
yes edhopper Apr 2015 #41
In which case, the correct term for the optic okasha Apr 2015 #42
It is a common metaphor. Warren Stupidity Apr 2015 #43
You introduced an "external opti." okasha Apr 2015 #44
Actually, ed introduced it in the OP. trotsky Apr 2015 #45
And i confirmed edhopper Apr 2015 #46
He thinks a lens is a filter. Go figure! Starboard Tack Apr 2015 #54
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy." pinto Apr 2015 #14
And yours as well edhopper Apr 2015 #24
Yeah. I meant it as supportive of your OP, though. pinto Apr 2015 #50
Thanks for the clarification edhopper Apr 2015 #51
Not bad...(10^27)...not bad...but if you want to contemplate something really mind blowing... NeoGreen Apr 2015 #18
That's why I'm convinced that mine is the one true church. delrem Apr 2015 #20
That is a lot of stars. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #27
And around ~95% of all of the known universe F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #31
And after that, G*D spent eternity worrying about Dale and Gary's marriage in Cleveland. Half-Century Man Apr 2015 #52
and in all the 15 billion years edhopper Apr 2015 #53
Indeed it is something to think about Starboard Tack Apr 2015 #55
The greater we see the Universe is edhopper Apr 2015 #56

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
1. The possibilities of what may out there approach the infinite.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 03:34 PM
Apr 2015

That is indeed something to think about through the lens of your belief or non-believ.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
8. oh wait, you are promoting theology based on there being lots of stars.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 04:02 PM
Apr 2015

Just because there are a lot of stars doesn't mean the the set of what is possible changes.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
16. Or else they reach the infinite...
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 04:28 PM
Apr 2015

...and keep going...

The possibilities of what may out there approach the infinite.


edhopper

(33,579 posts)
3. There is a little village in Italy
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 03:38 PM
Apr 2015

that is my favorite spot on earth.
Everyone has their special backwater place.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
6. I have one there as well.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 03:46 PM
Apr 2015

Maybe we share the same place. What would be the possibility of that happening?

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
15. And they are countless.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 04:21 PM
Apr 2015

I will be living there again this summer. Maybe we will run into each other.

bobalew

(321 posts)
4. An Octillion or more.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 03:39 PM
Apr 2015

How many with Planets in the galactic "Goldilocks Zones", Who is to say? Maybe 2 or 3 magnitudes less, it's still a staggering number, nonetheless. It allows for a rather large statistical possibility of places exactly like ours scattered all about the universe. Even at billions of galaxy & maybe only 2 planets like ours, per unit is a giant number, and that's being very conservative, the only instance of that i even think of allowing.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
5. I don't get it?
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 03:42 PM
Apr 2015

Lots of stars and planets means there is a god. Lots of planets and stars means random expansion and there is no god.
Or does it mean lots of stars and planets and we can't prove either side is right.

edhopper

(33,579 posts)
10. Just a fact that can lead to interesting thoughts
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 04:06 PM
Apr 2015

I wasn't making a point, just starting a thread.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
17. Ok thanks. In that vein try to describe to a person
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 04:29 PM
Apr 2015

where you are without relating your existence to anything else.
Or how were you born with out relating to anyone else.
Dependent origination is something I think about a lot.
Nothing happens without something else happening first.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
36. The number of stars and planets does not alter the set of what is possible.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 07:13 PM
Apr 2015

It just increases the likelihood that each element within the set of the possible exists somewhere.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
37. So there are other stars that exist only in the "other" dimension?
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 07:14 PM
Apr 2015

I'm not sure that you and I have the same understanding of "dimension".

edhopper

(33,579 posts)
23. True
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 05:55 PM
Apr 2015

but not believing an deity or any supernatural component to the Universe does affect the way you see it.

That lens.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
47. Lots of feelings.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 10:30 AM
Apr 2015

Hope for the vast array of interesting new things out there we've never seen. Disappointment that I'll never go see them. Hope, fear, clarity, confusion.

The universe is vast and old enough, trying to grok it pretty much evokes all possible emotions simultaneously.

I don't know how that would be different from a believer, except, a filter of religious certainty might skew the array of emotions one direction or another.

edhopper

(33,579 posts)
48. That's all I'm saying
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 10:36 AM
Apr 2015

it was the start of a discussion, not a statement.

In the context of this forum, I can see the reasons people respond to this as both confirming there is a God and that there is not one.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
49. I don't think it's relevant to the question of whether there are or are not god(s).
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 11:02 AM
Apr 2015

Not unless the age/vastness of the universe speaks to the requirement of a designer/mind. Which it does not appear to.

If in the end we find the universe can't exist without a designer, then the number of planets, specifically, isn't relevant. The designer could be required if there was one sun, or centillions.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
39. Actually in this case the "lens" referred to is, in the metaphor,
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 08:13 PM
Apr 2015

an external optic, not the lens of your eyeball. It means "from the perspective of", or "filtered by". For example "through the lens of bitter caustic snark".

okasha

(11,573 posts)
42. In which case, the correct term for the optic
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 08:21 PM
Apr 2015

would be "filter," as in "through the filter of gunnuttery."

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
43. It is a common metaphor.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 08:24 PM
Apr 2015

"through the lens". You can google it. I surprised at your ignorance. Usually you are pretty much expert on everything under the sun.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
44. You introduced an "external opti."
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 08:32 PM
Apr 2015

Now, where did you say you obtained your Ph. D. In Wikipedia Studies?

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
45. Actually, ed introduced it in the OP.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:32 AM
Apr 2015

Your snark and insults are inappropriate. But then again, you pal around with someone who calls other human beings "vermin" for simply having a different opinion, so I guess it's to be expected.

edhopper

(33,579 posts)
46. And i confirmed
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 09:51 AM
Apr 2015

that that was the right reading of the metaphor.
Or don't you know the origins?


1 Corinthians 13:12

12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.

pinto

(106,886 posts)
14. "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 04:16 PM
Apr 2015

W. Shakespeare
- Hamlet (1.5.167-8), Hamlet to Horatio



pinto

(106,886 posts)
50. Yeah. I meant it as supportive of your OP, though.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:46 PM
Apr 2015

There's so much that we don't know out there and all around us. Accepting that has a lot of value, imo. Absolutism in any venue seems a roadblock to me.

NeoGreen

(4,031 posts)
18. Not bad...(10^27)...not bad...but if you want to contemplate something really mind blowing...
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 04:38 PM
Apr 2015

...

There are almost 10^24 water molecules in a shot glass full of water (@35ml/shot glass).

Give or take a few trillion.


delrem

(9,688 posts)
20. That's why I'm convinced that mine is the one true church.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 04:53 PM
Apr 2015

Nothing else except that conclusion makes sense.

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
31. And around ~95% of all of the known universe
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 06:42 PM
Apr 2015

Isn't even directly detectable yet.

And on top of that, there might be more universes.

That's what blows my mind.

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
52. And after that, G*D spent eternity worrying about Dale and Gary's marriage in Cleveland.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:55 PM
Apr 2015

oh, and stop masturbating too.

edhopper

(33,579 posts)
53. and in all the 15 billion years
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 02:55 PM
Apr 2015

he only talked to people in a small corner of the Middle East in the Iron Age.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
55. Indeed it is something to think about
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 03:28 PM
Apr 2015

I have spent many moonless nights, under clear skies, hundreds of miles from land, staring for hours on end at that vast blanket of stars, in absolute wonderment.
Interestingly, the idea of a deity rarely, if ever, enters my mind. There is also this mountain in Umbria that brings back so many memories of shooting stars on August nights.

edhopper

(33,579 posts)
56. The greater we see the Universe is
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 03:47 PM
Apr 2015

the more the quote "Your God is too small" in reference to the God most of the monotheistic believers worship makes sense.

But I'm with you, in that I rarely think about any deity when pondering the scope of Universe.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»1,000,000,000,000,000,000...