Religion
Related: About this forumPope scraps abuse tribunal for negligent bishops
VATICAN CITY Pope Francis on Saturday scrapped his proposed tribunal to prosecute bishops who covered up for pedophile priests after it ran into opposition and instead clarified legal procedures to remove them if the Vatican finds they were negligent.
The new procedures sought to answer longstanding demands by survivors of abuse that the Vatican hold bishops accountable for botching abuse cases. Victims have long accused bishops of covering up for pedophiles, moving rapists from parish to parish rather than reporting them to police and suffering no consequences.
But the new law was immediately criticized by survivors of abuse as essentially window dressing since there were already ways to investigate and dismiss bishops for wrongdoing they were just rarely used against bishops who failed to protect their flocks from pedophiles.
Analysts suggested the new law was much ado about very little.
There is nothing breaking here: The congregations could already do that, said Kurt Martens, professor of canon law at The Catholic University of America.
He said what is significant about the new law is that it makes no mention of the original proposal for the tribunal, which would have treated negligence as a crime and prosecuted it as such.
Does that mean the tribunal isnt going to come because there was too much opposition? he asked.
The main US victims group, SNAP, said it was extraordinarily skeptical that the new procedures would amount to any wave of dismissals, since popes have always had the power to oust bishops but havent wielded it.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/world/2016/06/04/pope-scraps-abuse-tribunal-for-negligent-bishops/z9hktjoNq68obArQ0eC8eN/story.html
edhopper
(33,579 posts)Last edited Sun Jun 5, 2016, 07:28 PM - Edit history (1)
but i don't know if this is a good sign or bad?
rug
(82,333 posts)This is a good thing. Not too good for warren though.
but because they also thought the tribunal was bullshit, as did Warren.
The question now is what comes in it's place, if nothing or an equally meaningless measure, then it's not a good thing.
If something more robust, then it is.
rug
(82,333 posts)Unlike SNAP, warren doesn't think the RCC can ever do anything right. I would use another word but I'll polite and simply call it irrationality.
I can't speak for him.
As for me, I will just have to wait and see.
Actions speak louder than laws.
if i understand you correctly. In other words if we only get lip service.......
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Including the current one. All talk, no action, despite high-profile abusers and enablers living the good life at the Vatican.
edhopper
(33,579 posts)I am not holding my breath.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)of that corrupt and morally bankrupt organization, why on earth should we?