Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 07:26 AM Feb 2017

Leaked Draft of Trumps Religious Freedom Order Reveals Sweeping Plans to Legalize Discrimination

If signed, the order would create wholesale exemptions for people and organizations who claim religious objections to same-sex marriage, premarital sex, abortion, and trans identity.

By Sarah Posner
YESTERDAY 7:11 PM

A leaked copy of a draft executive order titled “Establishing a Government-Wide Initiative to Respect Religious Freedom,” obtained by The Investigative Fund and The Nation, reveals sweeping plans by the Trump administration to legalize discrimination.

The four-page draft order, a copy of which is currently circulating among federal staff and advocacy organizations, construes religious organizations so broadly that it covers “any organization, including closely held for-profit corporations,” and protects “religious freedom” in every walk of life: “when providing social services, education, or healthcare; earning a living, seeking a job, or employing others; receiving government grants or contracts; or otherwise participating in the marketplace, the public square, or interfacing with Federal, State or local governments.”

The draft order seeks to create wholesale exemptions for people and organizations who claim religious or moral objections to same-sex marriage, premarital sex, abortion, and trans identity, and it seeks to curtail women’s access to contraception and abortion through the Affordable Care Act. The White House did not respond to requests for comment, but when asked Monday about whether a religious freedom executive order was in the works, White House spokesman Sean Spicer told reporters, “I’m not getting ahead of the executive orders that we may or may not issue. There is a lot of executive orders, a lot of things that the president has talked about and will continue to fulfill, but we have nothing on that front now.”

Language in the draft document specifically protects the tax-exempt status of any organization that “believes, speaks, or acts (or declines to act) in accordance with the belief that marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman, sexual relations are properly reserved for such a marriage, male and female and their equivalents refer to an individual’s immutable biological sex as objectively determined by anatomy, physiology, or genetics at or before birth, and that human life begins at conception and merits protection at all stages of life.”

https://www.thenation.com/article/leaked-draft-of-trumps-religious-freedom-order-reveals-sweeping-plans-to-legalize-discrimination/

The draft executive order: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3441057-20170201151132485.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Leaked Draft of Trumps Religious Freedom Order Reveals Sweeping Plans to Legalize Discrimination (Original Post) rug Feb 2017 OP
no surprise and little can be done until 2018 beachbum bob Feb 2017 #1
This proposed order is so vast in its application there will be hundreds of lawsuits within days. rug Feb 2017 #3
Until Trump gets a second nominee on the USSC, this law would be unconstitutional whether it no_hypocrisy Feb 2017 #2
I agree. rug Feb 2017 #4
"Closely held for-profit corporations" guillaumeb Feb 2017 #5
well edhopper Feb 2017 #6
Yeah. He upheld Hobby Lobby at the Circuit Court of Appeals. rug Feb 2017 #7
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
3. This proposed order is so vast in its application there will be hundreds of lawsuits within days.
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 07:30 AM
Feb 2017

no_hypocrisy

(46,089 posts)
2. Until Trump gets a second nominee on the USSC, this law would be unconstitutional whether it
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 07:28 AM
Feb 2017

originated as an executive order, a congressional statute, or a state statute.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
4. I agree.
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 07:32 AM
Feb 2017

Gorsuch's particular interest is in religion which I suspect is why he was picked over Hardiman.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
5. "Closely held for-profit corporations"
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:49 PM
Feb 2017

Now, in addition to being persons, with all the rights of persons, corporate entities can be believers?

Well on the road to a Christian theocracy.

Recommended.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Leaked Draft of Trumps Re...