Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumFFRF lawsuit removes Santa Clara cross, formally settles -
https://ffrf.org/news/news-releases/item/28952-14-foot-cross-removed-from-calif-parkThe Freedom From Religion Foundation's lawsuit removing a 14-foot granite cross in a California public park has been formally settled this week.
FFRF and a local member sued the city of Santa Clara in April 2016, after FFRF had attempted for four years to persuade the city to remove the cross from Memorial Cross Park without litigation.
As part of the settlement, the city in January removed and donated the cross to the Catholic Santa Clara University.
The Santa Clara Lion's Club had contributed the cross to the city in 1953 for the decidedly nonsecular purpose of marking the site of the second Spanish Catholic mission, which had been established in 1777.
"We're pleased that the city divested itself of this religious symbol, and that the Constitution is now being complied with," says FFRF Managing Staff Attorney Rebecca Markert, who was co-counsel on the case.
Local officials acknowledged the correctness of FFRF's position.
"Some people feel like we've caved in or succumbed to the arguments of a relatively small number of people, but as I said, they [FFRF] do have a number of legal precedents on their side," councilmember Teresa O'Neill told NBC reporter Ian Cull.
..
"This sends a strong message of support of the wall of separation between religion and government," says FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor. "Reason and the Constitution have prevailed."
FFRF v. City of Santa Clara was litigated on behalf of FFRF by David J.P. Kaloyanides, with FFRF Legal Fellow Madeline Ziegler also serving as co-counsel. The case, No. 5:16-cv-02072, was before Judge Lucy H. Koh. Final settlement papers have been signed. The city of Santa Clara has agreed to pay attorney fees of $6,500, of which FFRF will recover legal costs.
- See more at: https://ffrf.org/news/news-releases/item/28952-14-foot-cross-removed-from-calif-park#sthash.aHANrmU9.dpuf
- See more at: https://ffrf.org/news/news-releases/item/28952-14-foot-cross-removed-from-calif-park#sthash.aHANrmU9.dpuf
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1169 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FFRF lawsuit removes Santa Clara cross, formally settles - (Original Post)
Heddi
Mar 2017
OP
trotsky
(49,533 posts)1. "they do have a number of legal precedents on their side"
Not to mention THE FREAKING CONSTITUTION.
Heddi
(18,312 posts)2. Yeah I chuckled when I read that
Well, the FFRF may have legal precedence and the constitution on their side but the City has, duh, GOD....
Igel
(35,300 posts)3. Bears Ears. n/t
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)4. Good. Another fantastic fight for the FFRF
Aren't there a bunch of people on here that don't like the FFRF for some stupid fucking reason?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)5. Why yes, I believe there are.
Along with the ACLU.
Which is really odd for a liberal website, usually hatred of the FFRF comes from rabid right wing zealots.