Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 06:17 PM Oct 2012

Christian and atheist soldiers both pay the ultimate price

Many of those who died fighting will not have their representative at London’s Cenotaph



Remembering: the fallen who had no faith are not always represented Photo: Getty Images

By Joan Bakewell
8:10PM GMT 29 Oct 2012

People are beginning to wear red poppies, a sight that always prompts a melancholy mood. Here we are again, still waging war in Afghanistan, still listing those killed on the news – and we will soon be coming together for Remembrance Sunday. All our universal grief seems helpless against the forces of realpolitik and the international arms trade.

This year, as for all years past, many of those who died fighting will not have their representative at London’s Cenotaph. Yet for some time now the humanists have asked for their representative to stand alongside those from the country’s religions at the official ceremony. They are, after all, the second largest belief group in the Armed Forces after Christianity. Other cities already accept their presence: Edinburgh, Belfast, Sheffield and Birmingham among them. But so far they have been kept away from the major national monument in Whitehall.

This is odd, because currently some 26,000 serving men are registered as having no religion. And the Armed Forces Humanist Association has more members than there are Jews or Sikhs in the Armed Forces. Jews and Sikhs, however, are represented. Until now the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, which co-ordinates arrangements at the Cenotaph, has not yielded. But this year there may be a chance.

In the recent Government reshuffle, Hugh Robertson MP was promoted to minister of state in that department. His background may be relevant: he served for 10 years in the Life Guards and commanded the British detachment in Sarajevo, coming close, I imagine, to the sort of squaddies whose deaths the ceremonial seeks to commemorate. Surely he will recognise that there is no distinction to be drawn between a dead soldier who is a professed Christian and a dead soldier who is not.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/9640831/Christian-and-atheist-soldiers-both-pay-the-ultimate-price.html

Yes, it's The Telegraph and yes, wars should not be marked with false solemnity, they should be eliminated. But if it is done, they should cut out this exclusive crap.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
6. Whatever happened with your internet connection?
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 07:05 PM
Oct 2012

I remember we had a long chat some time back about you getting wireless internet on your boat. Did you find a solution that works for you?

I started getting my wireless internet from a lot further away recently and had to do a shade tree long wifi link, ended up using some of the techniques we discussed.




cbayer

(146,218 posts)
7. Now that the tourists have vacated, our connection is much better.
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 07:12 PM
Oct 2012

It's all a matter of bandwidth over here. They suck it all up and, when they leave, there are very few of us using it.

In a fit, I canceled Netflix and Hulu a few weeks ago. I did this right before the service got better and now I regret it.

I wish there was a satellite alternative. We get Sirus radio just fine pretty much anywhere we go.

Glad you found a solution, Fumesucker!

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
8. Yet another reason to hate tourists
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 08:49 PM
Oct 2012

As if black dress socks with bermuda shorts and sandals isn't enough.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
4. It's one thing to have an old monumment rooted in the mores of the time.
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 06:39 PM
Oct 2012

It's entirely another when that old monument is presently used for a ceremony but is deliberately exclusive.

dmallind

(10,437 posts)
10. No surprise - yet another assumed and accepted religionist bias
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 11:05 PM
Oct 2012

No more news than that water is wet and the majority are clueless.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Christian and atheist sol...