Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 01:20 PM Dec 2012

Newest front in the Christmas wars: billboards

http://www.religionnews.com/2012/12/18/newest-front-in-the-christmas-wars-billboards/


Kimberly Winston | December 18, 2012


A billboard posted in Chico, Calif., that originally read “Don’t believe in God? Join the club” was defaced on Dec. 12, less than a week after it appeared, with vandals removing the word “don’t.” RNS photo courtesy United Coalition of Reason

(RNS) A billboard bearing a positive message about atheism has been vandalized — again.

A billboard posted in Chico, Calif., that originally read “Don’t believe in God? Join the club” was defaced on Dec. 12, less than a week after it appeared, with vandals removing the word “don’t.” The billboard was one of 12 purchased this month by a local chapter of the United Coalition of Reason (UnitedCoR), a national organization that works to unite small, local groups of atheists and other freethinkers.

They are the latest in a long line of billboards erected by atheist groups to draw ire, both locally and nationally. Every national freethought organization that has purchased billboards or bus advertisements in the last five years has reported some form of vandalism or protest.

If the billboards attract negative attention, criticism and vandalism, why do atheists — a group that polls repeatedly rank among the least-liked group in America — buy them? Are they worth the money and the ill will they cost the groups that buy them?

more at link
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Newest front in the Christmas wars: billboards (Original Post) cbayer Dec 2012 OP
The "ill will"? trotsky Dec 2012 #1
No, she said "ill will". rug Dec 2012 #6
Some writers love to use euphemisms. 2ndAmForComputers Dec 2012 #12
She didn't. rug Dec 2012 #13
Because you say so. 2ndAmForComputers Dec 2012 #14
Because I can read. rug Dec 2012 #18
Revealing that the writer is not interested in *why* the billboards draw vandals Fumesucker Dec 2012 #2
Are we reading the same article? cbayer Dec 2012 #3
All the questions seemed to be put to the atheists to explain themselves Fumesucker Dec 2012 #4
True. The only viewpoint from someone who objects is from the cbayer Dec 2012 #5
I love it Laochtine Dec 2012 #7
Me, too. cordelia Dec 2012 #10
By that twisted, bigoted logic... cleanhippie Dec 2012 #11
Twisted? cordelia Dec 2012 #16
Like an old vine. cleanhippie Dec 2012 #19
So we'll become stronger Laochtine Jan 2013 #20
I'm old enough to remember the uproar about antismoking advertisements. dimbear Dec 2012 #8
I am probably quoting this wrong and don't remember exactly who it was who said it but: Promethean Dec 2012 #9
Ghandi. JoeyT Dec 2012 #15
If there were a God, He would strike that b-board with lightning. It was struck by witlings. dimbear Dec 2012 #17

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
1. The "ill will"?
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 01:59 PM
Dec 2012

You mean the hatred we get from good Christian folk for simply announcing "we exist"?

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
2. Revealing that the writer is not interested in *why* the billboards draw vandals
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 02:17 PM
Dec 2012

Only why atheists are so mean as to put up signs that criminals will want to deface.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
3. Are we reading the same article?
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 02:35 PM
Dec 2012

I think he is clear on why and gives a pretty balanced view from several sides.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
4. All the questions seemed to be put to the atheists to explain themselves
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 02:41 PM
Dec 2012

I didn't notice any questions to or answers from the vandals.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
5. True. The only viewpoint from someone who objects is from the
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 03:14 PM
Dec 2012

Catholic League President.

It would be interesting to hear what the vandals have to say in their own words.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
11. By that twisted, bigoted logic...
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 11:06 AM
Dec 2012

christians are the weakest, erecting signs, churches, crosses, handing out tracts, going door to door....


Stay classy, cordelia. You make jesus happy.

cordelia

(2,174 posts)
16. Twisted?
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 06:28 PM
Dec 2012

You amuse me.

Did you forget "Rounds over"? Now that's some class right there.

Who says I'm a Christian anyway?

Merry Christmas.

dimbear

(6,271 posts)
8. I'm old enough to remember the uproar about antismoking advertisements.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 05:57 AM
Dec 2012

People gradually got accustomed to them, stopped objecting, and eventually paid attention. Now practically nobody smokes. I think we can all at least hope for a similar outcome here.

Promethean

(468 posts)
9. I am probably quoting this wrong and don't remember exactly who it was who said it but:
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 09:20 AM
Dec 2012

First they belittle us, then they fight us, then we win.

dimbear

(6,271 posts)
17. If there were a God, He would strike that b-board with lightning. It was struck by witlings.
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 06:58 PM
Dec 2012

Draw your own conclusions.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Newest front in the Chris...