Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumAppeals Court Upholds Voucher Plan That Would Fund Religious Schools In Colorado
Ruling Will Be Appealed To Colorado Supreme Court, ACLU And Americans United SaySource:
AU
"Press Release"
Feb 28, 2013
Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado and the national ACLU criticized the ruling.
This misguided decision fails to enforce the Colorado Constitutions strict prohibitions against public funding of religious education, said Alex J. Luchenitser, associate legal director for Americans United. Its clear that this voucher plan will funnel taxpayer money primarily into the coffers of religious schools.
The organizations challenged the program on behalf of a group of parents, clergy and other taxpayers. A lower court had previously struck down the plan.
While families have the right to decide where their children should attend school, the state cannot finance religious education at private institutions, said Heather L. Weaver, staff attorney for the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief. Public education funds should be used to help improve our public schools, not to promote religion in violation of the state constitution. (emphasis added)
https://www.au.org/media/press-releases/appeals-court-upholds-voucher-plan-that-would-fund-religious-schools-in
This misguided decision fails to enforce the Colorado Constitutions strict prohibitions against public funding of religious education, said Alex J. Luchenitser, associate legal director for Americans United. Its clear that this voucher plan will funnel taxpayer money primarily into the coffers of religious schools.
The organizations challenged the program on behalf of a group of parents, clergy and other taxpayers. A lower court had previously struck down the plan.
While families have the right to decide where their children should attend school, the state cannot finance religious education at private institutions, said Heather L. Weaver, staff attorney for the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief. Public education funds should be used to help improve our public schools, not to promote religion in violation of the state constitution. (emphasis added)
https://www.au.org/media/press-releases/appeals-court-upholds-voucher-plan-that-would-fund-religious-schools-in
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1090 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Appeals Court Upholds Voucher Plan That Would Fund Religious Schools In Colorado (Original Post)
Adsos Letter
Mar 2013
OP
Jim__
(14,075 posts)1. If the Colorado Supreme Court upheld the ruling, ...
... could it be appealed to the federal courts as a violation of the federal constitution? I don't know if the federal courts have ruled on this issue. Of course, with the current Supreme Court ...
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)2. Jim__, I don't know...
I wish rug were around to weigh in on this. Perhaps one of the lawyers on DU will add some info.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)5. I also miss having rug around to help with the legal aspects of these cases.
It's been over 2 weeks.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)4. I'm not sure, but other states (I believe FLA and LA) have passed similar laws
and there was no legislation in place that prohibited it. I am guessing that is why they haven't met these challenges. It may be a states issue.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)3. Unfortunate ruling. Glad to see they will take it to CO Supreme Court.
Leontius
(2,270 posts)6. Where is their statement opposing the use of public funding to schools such as
Notre Dame, Georgetown, Boston College, SMU, Liberty, BYU etc.
Jim__
(14,075 posts)7. I doubt the Colorado constitution or Colorado law would apply to those institutions.
But, the ACLU is certainly willing to take them on when it believes they've violated federal constitutional restrictions.
For instance, one old case:
A federal lawsuit alleging that the University of Notre Dame and the U.S. Department of Education used federal money for religious purposes was ordered to proceed Wednesday by a panel of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago.
...
The plaintiffs, Indiana residents Joan Laskowski and Daniel Cook, filed the lawsuit in December 2003 against the Department of Education. It alleges that the grant did not restrict the use of the money to non-religious purposes and therefore violated the 1st Amendment's requirement of separation of church and state.
Notre Dame later intervened as a defendant.
"The real problem is that the money wasn't tracked in any way so you could tell that it wasn't used for religious purposes," said Jacquelyn Suess, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana who is representing the plaintiffs. According to a legal brief from the government, Notre Dame said in its grant application that it planned to use the money for staff salaries and benefits, travel costs and to hold an annual meeting for the colleges involved. The brief also says that in applying for the grant, Notre Dame agreed not to use the money for religious purposes.
more ...
...
The plaintiffs, Indiana residents Joan Laskowski and Daniel Cook, filed the lawsuit in December 2003 against the Department of Education. It alleges that the grant did not restrict the use of the money to non-religious purposes and therefore violated the 1st Amendment's requirement of separation of church and state.
Notre Dame later intervened as a defendant.
"The real problem is that the money wasn't tracked in any way so you could tell that it wasn't used for religious purposes," said Jacquelyn Suess, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana who is representing the plaintiffs. According to a legal brief from the government, Notre Dame said in its grant application that it planned to use the money for staff salaries and benefits, travel costs and to hold an annual meeting for the colleges involved. The brief also says that in applying for the grant, Notre Dame agreed not to use the money for religious purposes.
more ...