A First Amendment Storm

[Adsos Letter]

Source:
New York Times
The Opinion Pages
"Editorial"
March 4, 2013

House Republicans and Democrats do not agree on much these days, but they managed to join together last month to breach the proper separation between church and state. By a 354-to-72 vote, the House approved a measure sponsored by Representatives Christopher Smith, a New Jersey Republican, and Grace Meng, a New York Democrat, that would authorize the Federal Emergency Management Agency to make direct grants to churches, mosques, synagogues and other houses of worship “without regard to the religious character of the facility or the primary religious use of the facility.”

In the bipartisan lunge to give in to political pressure from some religious groups after Hurricane Sandy, the House dispensed with holding even a single hearing before passing the bill, which abandons decades of Supreme Court precedent and longstanding administrative rules barring direct taxpayer financing of religious activities.

Complaints that current rules unfairly discriminate against houses of worship are simply wrong. Churches, like most nonprofit organizations and businesses, are eligible for government loans to make storm-related repairs. They are also eligible for disaster assistance grants, just as secular nonprofit organizations are, if they dedicate at least 50 percent of their facilities to providing “essential services of a governmental nature” — like a community homeless shelter or soup kitchen open to the general public on a nondiscriminatory basis.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/05/opinion/separation-between-church-and-state.html?ref=opinion&_r=2&

I'm in the middle of installing a tile floor (just took a break for a couple minutes to let the mortar sweat in) so I won't be able to get back to this until later.

For the record: I agree with this opinion piece.

[MotherPetrie]

1. Ditto

[cbayer]

2. I also think they made the right decision here.