Religion
Related: About this forumAct as mothers, not old maids, Pope tells nuns............
http://www.dnaindia.com/world/1832325/report-act-as-mothers-not-old-maids-pope-tells-nunszitella is the word he employs, which indeed means old maid. The first cut is the deepest.
Phillip McCleod
(1,837 posts)how about this little tidbit.. where are all the popologists now, i wonder?
The Vatican wants to overhaul the organisation, the largest umbrella group of American nuns, accusing it of veering from Church doctrine on issues such as abortion and same-sex marriage and of promoting "certain radical feminist themes".
but he kissed a girl's feet!
for fuck's sake.
MattBaggins
(7,905 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)What do the rest of the words mean?
dimbear
(6,271 posts)E' una dicotomia assurda pensare di vivere con Gesù senza la Chiesa, di seguire Gesù al di fuori della Chiesa, di amare Gesù senza amare la Chiesa (cfr ibid., 16). Sentite la responsabilità che avete di curare la formazione dei vostri Istituti nella sana dottrina della Chiesa, nellamore alla Chiesa e nello spirito ecclesiale.
It's absurd to think of being able to live with Jesus without the church, to follow Jesus outside the church, to love Jesus without loving the church. (That's a quote from St. Paul.) Take the responsibility to care for your institutions in the healthy doctrine of the church, in the love of the church and in the ecclesiastical spirit.
*****Mostly just a pep talk.
rug
(82,333 posts)That original snippet came from his comments on the three vows of poverty chastity and obedience.
This is the full paragraph:
Here's the full paragraph of your last excerpt.
You're right, it is basically a pep talk. Nothing new there at all.
enough
(13,268 posts)of celibacy as male priests that their vow and their celibacy makes them "old maids," and that their highest role is to be as if they had actually been sexual and become as "mothers." I can see what he's trying to do, but it's a cheap fucking trick.
Until their vow and their celibacy brings them to the priesthood within the church, this is just a slicker form of rhetoric. He tells them to be "mothers," just as priests are "fathers," but he will never allow them to be true parents within the church the same as the so-called "fathers."
Warpy
(111,414 posts)Freed from the only two occupations of teaching and nursing, nuns have gone out into the community in all sorts of ways, acting as "mothers" to people who most need it.
Damned few orders are still cloistered. Most have been rebuked by Pope Ratz for being far too concerned with worldly affairs like easing the lives of the poorest rather than being handmaidens to the church hierarchy.
I think that one statement has alienated nuns about as far as they were alienated from Ratz.
Fresh_Start
(11,330 posts)or abusers.
Like a mother grizzly, attack those who threaten your children.
Attack those who would sacrifice the life of your child to an amorphous other.
MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)Not.
niyad
(113,752 posts)bet the nuns weren't.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)and turn some of them in. Maybe they could turn over the guy who was in charge of all that, I hear he just retired...
trotsky
(49,533 posts)It's to the point where you wonder if it's not some kind of Stockholm syndrome thing with nuns and liberal/moderate Catholics.
rug
(82,333 posts)Do post when you've come to a conclusion or abandon passive-aggressive statements, whichever comes first. Broad brushes work best without coyness.
In the meantime, this is one of the things that's going on outside your narrow world view.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12212570
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)is the only "narrow world view" visible here.
You've shown us a little group of Catholics desperate to stick with the church no matter what. Something new there? Contrary to your claim, some of us here HAVE seen that before..
rug
(82,333 posts)All I've seen is a little group of antitheists desperate to bash with the church no matter what.
okasha
(11,573 posts)nt
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)Or is it just another invention of yours, okasha?
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)So enabling child rape and rampant homophobia and sexism is "no matter what"?
Pathetic. Really.
rug
(82,333 posts)I wonder what your reaction to garlic is like.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)Bashing the church over enabling child rape and not treating homosexuals as full and equal people is nothing to bash it about. But try to to be so blatant about your defense of bigotry on a progressive web site.
rug
(82,333 posts)the Catholic Church exists for the sole purpose of promoting pedophilia but, like so many of your posts, you're wrong. What makes this site useful is that it is relentlessly fact based. Since your posts uniformly reek of talking points and preformed biases, and not facts, I am unsurprised your little corner makes DU suck.
Oh, and I haven't even mentioned your regular personal hostility to any poster who types anything that affronts your narrow world view. You're welcome.
Now, how proving your claim that I defend bigotry, scottie? Do you think that latest ejection of bullshit from you is going to stand unquestioned? Let's hear it.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)the Catholic church's "sole purpose" is. I've never said that I have any such opinion and I defy you to prove otherwise. I know you can only label me as wrong and having a "narrow world view" by making shit up, but it really makes you look foolish.
rug
(82,333 posts)But if you must, don't utter your presumptions.
nt