Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumHow Atheists Are Fighting Back Against Military Discrimination
The evangelizing of the military that I discussed in my previous article has not come without a backlash. The controversies at the Air Force Academy were enough to galvanize one man to begin the long fight to roll back Christian Dominionism. Mikey Weinstein, whose son, a cadet, was slurred and harassed as a dirty Jew who killed Jesus, founded the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) in 2005. Weinstein, a registered Republican and former lawyer in the Reagan White House, has made it his goal to assist members of the military who are targeted, excluded, or harassed for their beliefs or lack thereof. (Hes also living proof that the separation of church and state is something that all of us not just those on the left can support.)
The watchdog MRFF, whose explicit mission is the defense of each soldiers control over his or her faith, has found itself involved in several controversies since its inception. Its 2007 report on government involvement with parachurch organizations revealed the paid missionaries noted above. But the group is far from the only one pointing out the evangelizing of our military, specifically at the Air Force Academy. The Yale Divinity Schools 2004 report to Chaplain Colonel Michael Whittington detailed systematic proselytizing toward non-evangelical soldiers.
The evangelized military is, as you might imagine, horribly oppressive to those who dont drink the same flavor-aid. The effects of exclusion and discrimination dont need to be repeated here. Thus it is easy to imagine how damaging such exclusion would be to the military, which prides itself on the cohesion of its units. Put quite simply, as social cohesion decreases, so does the efficacy of the whole group. There is a clear psychological basis for the negative effects of rejection, which supports the idea that it is simply a terrible idea to discriminate against members of an incredibly important team.
Attempts to protect soldiers from proselytizing and other harassment have met with little success. Attempts to make the military more inclusive for nonbelievers has met with even less success. Congress recently reaffirmed its opinion that nonbelievers deserve none of the resources of the chaplaincy. In voting against allowing secular chaplains in our armed forces, the House sent a clear message to atheists, humanists, and other nonbelievers that they do not deserve access to chaplains who share their philosophy.
http://www.policymic.com/articles/62145/how-atheists-are-fighting-back-against-military-discrimination
The watchdog MRFF, whose explicit mission is the defense of each soldiers control over his or her faith, has found itself involved in several controversies since its inception. Its 2007 report on government involvement with parachurch organizations revealed the paid missionaries noted above. But the group is far from the only one pointing out the evangelizing of our military, specifically at the Air Force Academy. The Yale Divinity Schools 2004 report to Chaplain Colonel Michael Whittington detailed systematic proselytizing toward non-evangelical soldiers.
The evangelized military is, as you might imagine, horribly oppressive to those who dont drink the same flavor-aid. The effects of exclusion and discrimination dont need to be repeated here. Thus it is easy to imagine how damaging such exclusion would be to the military, which prides itself on the cohesion of its units. Put quite simply, as social cohesion decreases, so does the efficacy of the whole group. There is a clear psychological basis for the negative effects of rejection, which supports the idea that it is simply a terrible idea to discriminate against members of an incredibly important team.
Attempts to protect soldiers from proselytizing and other harassment have met with little success. Attempts to make the military more inclusive for nonbelievers has met with even less success. Congress recently reaffirmed its opinion that nonbelievers deserve none of the resources of the chaplaincy. In voting against allowing secular chaplains in our armed forces, the House sent a clear message to atheists, humanists, and other nonbelievers that they do not deserve access to chaplains who share their philosophy.
http://www.policymic.com/articles/62145/how-atheists-are-fighting-back-against-military-discrimination
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 831 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Atheists Are Fighting Back Against Military Discrimination (Original Post)
SecularMotion
Sep 2013
OP
cbayer
(146,218 posts)1. MMRF is doing an excellent job of addressing this, but it's an uphill battle.
FWIW, I really like policymic. They have some very good young journalists writing for them.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)2. The Evangelical movement is one of the cancers
which was not cured during the Civil War.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)3. My son is an athiest airman (NG)
Fortunately he is a techie type, surrounded by other techie types and is in Mass, so he doesn't run into the preachy types. I'd be willing to bet the topic of religion never even comes up