Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 08:07 PM Aug 2013

How much *heat is Fukyshima (sp?) putting into the the atmosphere? (rads aside)...anyone have an

educated guess? I'm not educated in this stuff, but would like to know about that. I already have a really sickening feeling about the radiation. Just wondering about the heat, and what I might need to be expecting. Thanks for ?

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How much *heat is Fukyshima (sp?) putting into the the atmosphere? (rads aside)...anyone have an (Original Post) silvershadow Aug 2013 OP
Im not sure the heat is the problem. Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #1
Yeah, but would heat also be with it? ...for example, would it be silvershadow Aug 2013 #2
Less heat than when they (all 4 reactors) were operating normally. n/t PoliticAverse Aug 2013 #3
Thank you. nt silvershadow Aug 2013 #5
Probably not RobertEarl Aug 2013 #4
I figured as much with the cores. Thanks for your comments. nt silvershadow Aug 2013 #6
No - when the reactors were operating they generated a lot of heat Yo_Mama Aug 2013 #8
We are done, toasted darkangel218 Aug 2013 #7
A graveyard of vehicles contaminated at Chernobyl Ichingcarpenter Aug 2013 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 Aug 2013 #11
The heat is insignificant... Orsino Aug 2013 #10
 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
2. Yeah, but would heat also be with it? ...for example, would it be
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 08:34 PM
Aug 2013

enough to disrupt weather? Change weather patterns? Change local climate? etc. That's why I'm asking.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
4. Probably not
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 08:56 PM
Aug 2013

It could cause local heating of the waters. Indeed satellites did show an anomaly of heat near to the plant in April.

The real problem is the radiation. It is suspected in causing a few atypical weather events, but so little is known about weather events that Fukushima is just another wrinkle.

However, the ionizing and the noble gasses could be having an effect, similar in regards to how freon has been discovered to deplete ozone.

One unknown is where the cores reside. One theory is they have burned down into the earth. Could they be boiling groundwater and causing something similar to what we know as fracking? Minor earthquakes have been associated with fracking.

All in all, Fukushima is a grand experiment against our environment and there may be some huge surprises yet.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
8. No - when the reactors were operating they generated a lot of heat
Thu Aug 22, 2013, 08:35 PM
Aug 2013

Now, much less. These were boiling water reactors. There's much less energy output now, so much less heat generated.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
7. We are done, toasted
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 10:51 PM
Aug 2013

Or roasted. Whatever you want to call it.

Fukushima turned out to be worse than Chenobyl in the long run.


Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
9. A graveyard of vehicles contaminated at Chernobyl
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 05:37 AM
Aug 2013


A graveyard for vehicles highly contaminated by radiation, near the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, seen on Nov. 10, 2000. Some 1,350 Soviet military helicopters, buses, bulldozers, tankers, transporters, fire engines and ambulances were used while fighting against the April 26, 1986 nuclear accident at Chernobyl. All were irradiated during the clean-up operation. (AP Photo/Efrem Lukatsky)



- See more at: http://aibob.blogspot.dk/2011/12/1986-chernobyl-nuclear-disaster.html#sthash.2r3ekpov.dpuf



Don't forget someone drove those in to park em.

Response to Ichingcarpenter (Reply #9)

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
10. The heat is insignificant...
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 11:14 AM
Aug 2013

...next to all the waste heat of non-nuclear human activity and warming due to greenhouse gas emissions.

But the radioactive poison is going to kill directly or otherwise contribute to higher mortality rates.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»How much *heat is Fukyshi...