Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 01:14 PM Sep 2013

U.S. Science Laureate Bill Derailed by Repubs

On Tuesday, the U.S. House of Representatives was expected to give swift approval to a bill introduced this spring by a bipartisan coalition of legislators in both the House and the Senate. The legislation would allow the president to name not more than three laureates at a time to an unpaid position that could last up to 2 years. The idea was considered so innocuous that it was to be brought up under special rules requiring a two-thirds majority and allowing no amendments.

The bill was never discussed in any committee, however, and Larry Hart of the American Conservative Union hit the roof when he saw it on the House calendar for the next day. (The Washington, D.C.-based group calls itself “the oldest and largest grassroots conservative organization in the nation.”) In a letter to other conservative organizations and every House member, Hart said the bill would give President Barack Obama the opportunity to appoint someone “who will share his view that science should serve political ends, on such issues as climate change and regulation of greenhouse gases.” He also called the bill “a needless addition to the long list of presidential appointments.”

The House Republican leadership reacted immediately, pulling the bill from the floor schedule. Representative Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) had introduced the bill along with Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX), who chairs the House science committee, and a House Democratic aide says “we had expected it to pass easily. It’s no secret that Ms. Lofgren and chairman Smith don’t see eye-to-eye on many things. But they agree on the value of creating this honorary position.”

A staffer for another co-sponsor, Representative Randy Hultgren (R-IL), took issue with Hart’s characterization of the bill as a vehicle for the president to advance his political agenda. “This is not a presidential appointment, and there would be no taxpayer money involved,” the aide said. “This bill is simply a chance to show our children that discovery science is important and that science can be an exciting and rewarding career.”

more

http://news.sciencemag.org/climate/2013/09/u.s.-science-laureate-bill-hits-roadblock

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Science Laureate Bill Derailed by Repubs (Original Post) n2doc Sep 2013 OP
And we wonder why the U.S. in #20 in Science. CincyDem Sep 2013 #1
Nice to know my rep. (L. Smith) actually tried to do something positive. northoftheborder Sep 2013 #2
We don't need no stinkin' scientists undeterred Sep 2013 #3

CincyDem

(6,407 posts)
1. And we wonder why the U.S. in #20 in Science.
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 01:23 PM
Sep 2013

God knows that if we show our children that discover science is important, they might discover something about the difference between fact and opinion, and then, well...all hell breaks loose when attendance at the Creationist Museum falls off because kids actually know as fact that little boys and girls weren't out 6000 years ago riding their pet dinosaurs.

northoftheborder

(7,575 posts)
2. Nice to know my rep. (L. Smith) actually tried to do something positive.
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 08:15 PM
Sep 2013

Too bad a bunch of nincompoops railroaded it!

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»U.S. Science Laureate Bil...