Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jim__

(14,076 posts)
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 05:29 AM Dec 2014

NIST physicists build a watt balance using LEGO blocks to measure Planck's constant

From phys.org:

[center]

CAD model of the LEGO watt balance. The balance pivots about the T-block at the center. Two PVC endcaps with copper windings hang from universal joints off either side of the balance beam. Coil A is on the left and Coil B is on the right. A 10 gram mass sits on the Coil A mass pan and each coil is concentric to its own magnet system. Two lasers are used to calibrate and measure the linear velocity of each coil. Credit: arXiv:1412.1699 <physics.ins-det>[/center]

[hr]

(Phys.org)—A team of physicists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) outside of Washington D.C. has found a way to bring physics to the masses—they've designed and built a watt balance based on LEGO blocks. They've also written a paper and uploaded it to the preprint server arXiv in which they describe their device and how it was built it, should readers wish to construct one of their own.

To understand why the team at NIST would do such a thing requires a bit of background. Over the last century or so, scientists have been slowly replacing physical artifacts used for measurement, with devices that are based on more standard phenomenon—the meter, for example, is now based on time, rather than a rod sitting in a building. The lone holdout has been the kilogram, which is still defined by a chunk of metal sitting in a vault in France. But that's going to change soon, as the International System of Units is reviewing possibilities—one of which are devices based on measuring the value of Planck's constant to a certain degree of accuracy. Planck's constant describes the relationship between the energy and frequency of an electromagnetic wave. One kind of device that can be used to measure mass based on Planck's constant or taken the other way, to find a value for Planck's constant based on a known mass, is called a watt balance. It does its work by balancing the force exerted by gravity with the force of current in a coil—the mass of an object can be calculated by comparing the mechanical power to the electrical power in the device.

more ...


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NIST physicists build a watt balance using LEGO blocks to measure Planck's constant (Original Post) Jim__ Dec 2014 OP
That's pretty neat TexasProgresive Dec 2014 #1
Strange that no one bothers to capitalize Watt ... eppur_se_muova Dec 2014 #2
Yeah, they're just common nouns. Igel Dec 2014 #3

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
1. That's pretty neat
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 07:31 AM
Dec 2014

But I take issue with the meter being based on time-since it is a length it is since

(1984), the Geneva Conference on Weights and Measures has defined the meter as the distance light travels, in a vacuum, in 1/299,792,458 seconds with time measured by a cesium-133 atomic clock
. So the meter is a length determined by how far light travels in 1/299,792,458 seconds. Time is part of the equation but is not the meter.

eppur_se_muova

(36,262 posts)
2. Strange that no one bothers to capitalize Watt ...
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 11:20 AM
Dec 2014

the watt balance is named after the SI unit, the watt, which is named after James Watt. Apparently SI units taken from proper names are never capitalized except when abbreviated, a rule I had never known of before.

http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/units.html

Igel

(35,301 posts)
3. Yeah, they're just common nouns.
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 07:11 PM
Dec 2014

I'm tired of trying to convince others that you really don't want to calculate the weight of a student in Newtons. I mean, is that a young Newton, or an old Newton--or Newton's remains? With or without his wig?

Sorry, there is no standard Newton. Even if we all do settle on Sir Isaac.

Best to use newtons. Even fig newtons would be better.

Now if I could just get Yevic's pronunciation of "joule" as "jowl" out of my head. (Yevic was my freshman physics prof.)

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»NIST physicists build a w...