Science
Related: About this forumAnti-evolution group sues to block Kansas science standards
An anti-evolution group filed a federal lawsuit Thursday to block Kansas from using new, multistate science standards in its public schools, arguing the guidelines promote atheism and violate students and parents religious freedom.
The group, Citizens for Objective Public Education, had criticized the standards developed by Kansas, 25 other states and the National Research Council for treating both evolution and climate change as key scientific concepts to be taught from kindergarten through 12th grade. The Kansas State Board of Education adopted them in June to replace evolution-friendly standards that had been in place since 2007.
The new standards, like the ones they replaced, reflect the mainstream scientific view that evolution is well-established. Most board members believed the guidelines will improve science education by shifting the emphasis in science classes to doing hands-on projects and experiments.
The nonprofit organization based in the small community of Peck, south of Wichita, was joined in its lawsuit by 15 parents from across the state with a total of 18 children most of them in public schools and two taxpayers from the Kansas City-area community of Lake Quivira. The parents say theyre Christians who want to instill a belief in their children that life is a creation made for a purpose.
more
http://cjonline.com/news/2013-09-26/anti-evolution-group-sues-block-kansas-science-standards
atreides1
(16,094 posts)And according to these fanatics, that purpose includes the raping of the planet until their savior appears and takes them away to a better place while those of us who don't fit into their little cookie cutter world, are left behind to suffer!
If Christianity is so damn great why does it need all the man made PR to promote it????
elleng
(131,176 posts)that is, to replicate itself!
cloudbase
(5,525 posts)like willful ignorance.
2naSalit
(86,822 posts)a dangerous thing for those who require ignorance to promote their dogma.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Turbineguy
(37,372 posts)"Citizens for Objective Public Education". I suppose they can't very well call it "Citizens for Universal Ignorance.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)"The lawsuit argues that the new standards will cause Kansas public schools to promote a non-theistic religious worldview by allowing only materialistic or atheistic explanations to scientific questions..."
The curriculum should include designing and performing scientific experiments on the subject of a creationist origin of life-forms.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)So.... do it.... if you can.
But don't drag all the other kids down with yours.
Your dumb kids can forget all that science after school just like you did. What's the prob?
lastlib
(23,311 posts)Don't these idjits EVER get tired of being stoopid??!?1?
lastlib
(23,311 posts)(actually, the article linked in OP is from last year......)
http://ncse.com/news/2014/12/lawsuit-over-ngss-dismissed-0016025
<snip>
Judge Crabtree's decision did not address the content of the complaint, instead finding that that the Kansas state board of education and the Kansas state department of education enjoyed Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity against the suit and that the plaintiffs lacked standing to assert any of their claims, failing to establish any of the three relevant requirements for standing: injury, causation, and addressability.....the lead plaintiff, COPE, Citizens for Objective Public Education, is a new creationist organization, founded in 2012, but its leaders and attorneys include people familiar from previous attacks on evolution education across the country, such as John H. Calvert of the Intelligent Design Network. The Kansas board of education voted to adopt the NGSS in June 2013, and the lawsuit in effect attempted to undo the decision.
(National Center for Science Education)'s Josh Rosenau, who dismissed the lawsuit as "silly" to the Associated Press (September 26, 2013) when it was filed, expressed satisfaction at the outcome. He predicted that even if the plaintiffs had established standing, they would have lost the case: "They were trying to say that anything not promoting their religion is promoting some other religion, and that argument has been repeatedly rejected by the courts."
----------------------------------------
at least one defeat for willful ignorance........
ffr
(22,672 posts)I am so over these anti-evolutionist idiot fucktards!!! Tell them Christina.