Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
Related: About this forumOk, this is freaky cool
This morning in SW Florida we had a wicked line of unusual storms slide through. I just caught a brief local news story about Naples FL though and apparently there is some kind of rig at the end of Naples pier that collects data. This line of storms brought a mini tsunami!
http://www.nbc-2.com/story/30986309/nws-possible-meteotsunami-occurred-in-naples
According to the National Weather Service, they have very good reason to believe a "meteotsunami," occurred early Sunday morning in Naples as the powerful, tornado-warned storm that brought widespread damage to the area moved onshore.
One condition they said convinced them a storm of this kind happened is the quick rise and fall of the sea levels. Water levels rose sharply in the Naples area as the severe thunderstorm moved in, packing wind gusts over 80 miles per hour.
A meteotsunami, according to the NWS is caused by air pressure disturbances often associated with fast moving weather systems, such as squall lines. These disturbances can generate waves in the ocean that travel at the same speed as the overhead weather system.
Such a squall line moved through Southwest Florida this morning. Its arrival at high tide led to widespread coastal flooding up and down the coastline as the strong thunderstorm winds helped drive the water onshore.
Only two more paragraphs at link.
What I find really remarkable is our ability to collect data. What would our outlook on global climate changes look like if we had 50 years of data at the same level we are able to collect today?
Would we actually be working towards slowing climate change instead of arguing if it even exists?
Lives were lost in today's storms, property was lost, but we learned as well.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1120 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ok, this is freaky cool (Original Post)
Cassiopeia
Jan 2016
OP
Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)1. More data won't conquer denial...
Those with a vested interest in ignoring it will continue to.
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)2. Oh believe me, I get it.
20 years ago climate change was a top issue. Today I could give a shit. I honestly feel it's already over.
However, I am still amazed by the new things we learn with science. Hopefully we can record the data and find a way to save it in a manner the distant future can make use of.