Evolution and Climate Change Should Be Taught in Schools, Say States

[xchrom]

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/budding-scientist/2012/05/11/evolution-and-climate-change-should-be-taught-in-schools-say-states/

One day after new test results showed that only 32 percent of U.S. 8th graders are proficient in science, a group of 26 states has helped draft a document that may bring about a major overhaul of science education in this country. Known as the Next Generation Science Standards, the draft sets ambitious new expectations for what students should learn in each grade from kindergarten through high school, specifying that evolution and an understanding of how human activity impacts the climate are essential components of scientific literacy. Starting in 2013, states will have the option of adopting these standards and bringing their school curricula in line with them.

The standards are based on recommendations from the National Research Council of the National Academies and address many perceived shortcomings in science education. “Currently, K-12 science education in the United States…is not organized systematically across multiple years of school, emphasizes discrete facts with a focus on breadth over depth, and does not provide students with engaging opportunities to experience how science is actually done,” wrote the authors of the NRC framework. The standards also put new emphasis on engineering, an area that U.S. teenagers, judging by recent studies, know little about. They also stress process as much as content, explaining how scientists build on and revise their knowledge based on evidence, how they ask questions and define problems, how they develop and use models, and plan and carry out investigations. For example, the standards call for kindergarteners to “use observations to describe how plants and animals depend on the air, land, and water where they live to meet their needs.” Middle schoolers would develop models to represent the “cycling from carbon in the atmosphere to carbon in living things.”

The recommendations also explicitly include the teaching of climate change, evolution, natural selection and the history of Earth. Middle schoolers would “obtain and evaluate information about how two populations of the same species in different environments have evolved to become separate species.” They would also “use system models and representations to explain how human activities significantly impact: (1) the geosphere, (2) the hydrosphere, (3) the atmosphere, (4) the biosphere, and (5) global temperatures.”

Forty-five states plus the District of Columbia recently signed on to common math and language arts standards, and organizers of this effort hope it will be at least as successful. But, says Stephen Pruitt, vice president for content, research and development at Achieve, the Washington, D.C.- based non-profit that is organizing the effort with a major grant from the Carnegie Corporation of New York, “Its’s a draft! We want people to give us feedback and we will be responding to that feedback.”

[Jim__]

1. “... science education in the United States ... emphasizes discrete facts with a focus on breadth...

“... over depth ..."

That makes it so much easier and cheaper to test.

[GreenPartyVoter]

3. So true!

[kestrel91316]

2. Tragic that only 30% of students know anything about science.

I am still amazed at the FABULOUS science education I got in junior high in, of all places, a Mormon part of Utah in the early 70s. Of course that was long before the Reagan anti-science revolution.

[Brooklyn Dame]

4. It's shameful...

...that there should even be any doubt that science, the environment and the technology derived from and in support of those subjects should be taught in in school. The US is lagging other countries because we're still wasting time debating over a religious agenda being pushed on a government level; in the meantime, our students are falling backwards.

http://borderlessnewsandviews.com/2012/05/nerdy-girls/

http://borderlessnewsandviews.com/2012/04/rethinking-the-four-year-degree/

[Edim]

5. science should be pure.

http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/05/07/the-evolution-paradigm-shift/

[GaYellowDawg]

6. Stephen Pruitt...

This guy was the one who didn't see anything wrong with the initial omission of the word "evolution" when Georgia went from the QCC's to the GPS (these are the last 2 state curricula). He's more of a politician than he is an educator, and I don't trust him a bit.