Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mfcorey1

(11,001 posts)
Sun Jul 28, 2019, 06:58 AM Jul 2019

Climate change: 12 years to save the planet? Make that 18 months (lengthy)

Do you remember the good old days when we had "12 years to save the planet"?

Now it seems, there's a growing consensus that the next 18 months will be critical in dealing with the global heating crisis, among other environmental challenges.

Last year, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reported that to keep the rise in global temperatures below 1.5C this century, emissions of carbon dioxide would have to be cut by 45% by 2030.

But today, observers recognise that the decisive, political steps to enable the cuts in carbon to take place will have to happen before the end of next year.

The idea that 2020 is a firm deadline was eloquently addressed by one of the world's top climate scientists, speaking back in 2017.

Why is it so hot and is climate change to blame?
"The climate math is brutally clear: While the world can't be healed within the next few years, it may be fatally wounded by negligence until 2020," said Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, founder and now director emeritus of the Potsdam Climate Institute.

The sense that the end of next year is the last chance saloon for climate change is becoming clearer all the time.


"I am firmly of the view that the next 18 months will decide our ability to keep climate change to survivable levels and to restore nature to the equilibrium we need for our survival," said Prince Charles, speaking at a reception for Commonwealth foreign ministers recently.


Ever since a global climate agreement was signed in Paris in December 2015, negotiators have been consumed with arguing about the rulebook for the pact.

But under the terms of the deal, countries have also promised to improve their carbon-cutting plans by the end of next year.

Prince Charles has stressed how important the next 12 months are in tackling climate change
One of the understated headlines in last year's IPCC report was that global emissions of carbon dioxide must peak by 2020 to keep the planet below 1.5C.

Current plans are nowhere near strong enough to keep temperatures below the so-called safe limit. Right now, we are heading towards 3C of heating by 2100 not 1.5.

As countries usually scope out their plans over five and 10 year timeframes, if the 45% carbon cut target by 2030 is to be met then the plans really need to be on the table by the end of 2020.

What are the steps?
The first major hurdle will be the special climate summit called by UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, which will be held in New York on 23 September.

Mr Guterres has been clear that he only wants countries to come to the UN if they can make significant offers to improve their national carbon cutting plans.

This will be followed by COP25 in Santiago, Chile, where the most important achievement will likely be keeping the process moving forward.

But the really big moment will most likely be in the UK at COP26, which takes place at the end of 2020.

The UK government believes it can use the opportunity of COP26, in a post-Brexit world, to show that Britain can build the political will for progress, in the same way the French used their diplomatic muscle to make the Paris deal happen.

"If we succeed in our bid (to host COP26) then we will ensure we build on the Paris agreement and reflect the scientific evidence accumulating now that we need to go further and faster," said Environment Secretary Michael Gove, in what may have been his last major speech in the job.

"And we need at COP26 to ensure other countries are serious about their obligations and that means leading by example. Together we must take all the steps necessary to restrict global warming to at least 1.5C."

Reasons to be cheerful?
Whether it's the evidence of heatwaves, or the influence of Swedish school striker Greta Thunberg, or the rise of Extinction Rebellion, there has been a marked change in public interest in stories about climate change and a hunger for solutions that people can put in place in their own lives.

People are demanding significant action, and politicians in many countries have woken up to these changes.

The rise of school strikers like Greta Thunberg has reflected growing interest in the climate question
Ideas like the green new deal in the US, which might have seemed unfeasible a few years ago have gained real traction.

Some countries like the UK have gone even further and legislated for net zero emissions by 2050, the long-term goal that will keep temperatures down.

Prince Charles' sense that the next 18 months are critical is shared by some climate negotiators.

"Our group of small island developing states share Prince Charles's sense of the profound urgency for ambitious climate action," said ambassador Janine Felson from Belize who is the chief strategist for the Alliance of Small Island States group in the UN.

"All at once we are witness to a collective convergence of public mobilisation, worsening climatic impacts and dire scientific warnings that compel decisive climate leadership."

"Without question, 2020 is a hard deadline for that leadership to finally manifest itself."

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-48964736

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Climate change: 12 years to save the planet? Make that 18 months (lengthy) (Original Post) mfcorey1 Jul 2019 OP
Well, goodbye then... TreasonousBastard Jul 2019 #1
IOW ... GeorgeGist Jul 2019 #2
Consider the the current news about the Arctic. Delmette2.0 Jul 2019 #3
FYI...you're only allowed to post up to 4 paragraphs of an article. Javaman Jul 2019 #4
"Years left to save the planet" is equivalent to "by 20xx" or "by 21xx" nonsense... NNadir Jul 2019 #5

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
1. Well, goodbye then...
Sun Jul 28, 2019, 07:46 AM
Jul 2019

Unless someone can explain how the US, China, and India can ramp up that leadership "real soon now".

And that's just that big 3. I have no idea how Japan and S. Korea are doing, but at least Europe is trying.

South Asia, South America, Africa? Doesn't seem to be much going on there. Of course, Brazil and others are trying to clearcut the Amazon basin, which provides maybe 10% of the planet's oxygen. And, of course, is a huge CO2 sink.

Warming? Yeah, it's gonna happen. And no matter how many plastic bags and straws we ban, South Asia and the Philippines will make up for it. So, with the warming there will be a lot more seawater, but fewer fish and whales.

Delmette2.0

(4,164 posts)
3. Consider the the current news about the Arctic.
Sun Jul 28, 2019, 11:33 AM
Jul 2019

Huge fires across Alaska, Canada and Russia. Now a heat wave encroaching that will melt even more of the precious ice.

IMO we have crossed the point of no return, we and future generations are fucked.

Javaman

(62,521 posts)
4. FYI...you're only allowed to post up to 4 paragraphs of an article.
Mon Jul 29, 2019, 12:20 PM
Jul 2019

anything more and the mods may take it down.

NNadir

(33,515 posts)
5. "Years left to save the planet" is equivalent to "by 20xx" or "by 21xx" nonsense...
Mon Jul 29, 2019, 08:28 PM
Jul 2019

Last edited Mon Jul 29, 2019, 10:46 PM - Edit history (1)

...about how we'll live in a so called "renewable energy" nirvana powered by electric cars, wind turbines, and solar cells.

It's garbage thinking, and the reason we're in this situation - where the planet is actively being destroyed in such a way to be more irreversible daily is this kind of statement that people in the future have to be responsible for what we are doing to them NOW!!!!

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Climate change: 12 years ...