Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,874 posts)
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 03:49 PM Aug 2012

Many human 'prototypes' coexisted in Africa

Source: BBC

8 August 2012 Last updated at 17:06 GMT

Many human 'prototypes' coexisted in Africa

By Pallab Ghosh
Science correspondent, BBC News

Fossils from Northern Kenya show that a new species of human lived two million years ago, researchers say.

The discoveries suggests that at least three distinct species of humans co-existed in Africa.

The research adds to a growing body of evidence that runs counter to the popular perception that there was a linear evolution from monkey to ape to modern human.

The research has been published in the journal Nature.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

Read more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-19184370

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Many human 'prototypes' coexisted in Africa (Original Post) Eugene Aug 2012 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 Aug 2012 #1
Libertarians. n/t teenagebambam Aug 2012 #2
I have heard it described as exboyfil Aug 2012 #3
this makes sense. i've always questioned the linear model. It doesn't make sense at samsingh Aug 2012 #4
Linear evolution the popular perception? Curmudgeoness Aug 2012 #5
Speciation today... dangin Aug 2012 #6
Heh, heh! jamesatemple Aug 2012 #7

Response to Eugene (Original post)

exboyfil

(17,862 posts)
3. I have heard it described as
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 04:03 PM
Aug 2012

more of a bush which is pretty typical for organism evolution. That is why it is kind of silly to talk about missing links. The probability of finding an organism in the direct lineage is excedingly small (and you would never know it was either).

Trying to communicate and picture the times involved makes understanding evolution for complex organisms like mammals very difficult. I like to think about it terms of generations of animals and extrapolate something like a wolf to chihuahua and the amount of time which that took.

samsingh

(17,595 posts)
4. this makes sense. i've always questioned the linear model. It doesn't make sense at
Thu Aug 9, 2012, 05:14 PM
Aug 2012

an evolutionary level. Animals in different parts of the world would evolve differently so there should be several types of humanoids.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
5. Linear evolution the popular perception?
Thu Aug 9, 2012, 08:23 PM
Aug 2012

I was in college biology 40 years ago, and that was not the way it was suggested at that time. How long ago was a linear model acceptable.

The only people who think it is linear are the anti-evolutionist, who "didn't come from a monkey" or argue why there are still monkeys and apes. Valid argument if you believe in a linear model.

dangin

(148 posts)
6. Speciation today...
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 06:56 AM
Aug 2012

1st it is interesting that this may have been predicted in opening of 2001 space odyssey by the competing primate groups, one of which "wins" evolution's race by developing tool use.

Second, I'm a highly educated urban elitist intellectual with in-laws in the rural sticks who only watch Fox news. If this keeps up among humans for several hundred millinia we will speciate again. Homo-sapiens-foxamericanus is going to be an ugly, mean little species.

jamesatemple

(342 posts)
7. Heh, heh!
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 08:08 AM
Aug 2012

Now that's downright funny. I don't recall the name of the wit that suggested, "Some folks claim that Man sprang from the Ape. Well, I reckon that could be true. But it seems to me that some folks didn't spring as far as others."

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Many human 'prototypes' c...