Anthropology
Related: About this forumMegalithic super-henge found buried one mile from Stonehenge
An enormous row of 90 megalithic stones has been found buried beneath the prehistoric super-henge of Durrington Walls earthworks, only one mile from the world-famous site of Stonehenge in Wiltshire, England. The huge line of megalithic stones lies 3 feet underground and has just been discovered through the use of sophisticated radar equipment. The finding is believed to have been a huge ritual monument.
Were looking at one of the largest stone monuments in Europe and it has been under our noses for something like 4,000 years
Its truly remarkable. said Professor Vince Gaffney, from the University of Bradford and co-director of the Stonehenge Hidden Landscapes Project, which made the discovery. We dont think theres anything quite like this anywhere else in the world. This is completely new and the scale is extraordinary, he added.
The giant monoliths are up to 15 feet (4.5 meters) tall, and are believed to be sarsen stones sandstone blocks which were also used for the heelstone and circle uprights at Stonehenge. The stones are lying horizontally and archaeologists believe they were deliberately pushed over and covered with earth.
Not only does the new evidence demonstrate a completely unexpected phase of monumental architecture at one of the greatest ceremonial sites in prehistoric Europe, the new stone row could well be contemporary with the famous Stonehenge sarsen circle or even earlier, said Professor Gaffney.
Read more: http://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/major-discovery-4500-year-old-megalithic-super-henge-found-buried-one-mile-020519#ixzz3l2QNQlt7
And at
http://www.irishtimes.com/news/education/newly-discovered-superhenge-dwarfs-stonehenge-1.2342318
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)Not that the BBC is getting it correct either! I expect them to at least know that Avebury is the largest site, with its long avenues.
Here's the photo gallery of the Stonehenge Hidden Landscapes Project:
http://www.lbiarchpro-imagery.at/stonehenge2015_images
Dick Ahlstrom does a good job writing the Irish Times article.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)when the story broke and other
are just now picking up the story...... you may not like
Ancient Origins but they do post interesting stories ahead of other news agencies... that can lead to your own research..... you just have to search.
BBC was late picking the story up
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)And a lot of outlets were ahead of ancient origins. The latest BBC version is an improvement on their first story yesterday, release day.
I don't promote sites like ancient origins because they spread such bullshit about archaeology.