Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Brainstormy

(2,381 posts)
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 12:11 PM Mar 2015

David Brooks, religious clown: Debunking phony Godsplaining from the New York Times’ laziest columni

David Brooks wants us atheists to appreciate his magic book and silly myths. Let's try some actual facts instead

One might deem it almost shameful to publish one’s musings on the New York Times’ opinion page, the same page that continues to print, and quite shamelessly, the unapologetic scribbles of Iraq War cheerleader Thomas Friedman or the earnest yet befuddled lucubrations of useful Islamist idiot Nicholas Kristof. The first of these two columnists will probably never be called to account for the bloodshed and mayhem he has sanctioned in the Middle East. The second, I believe, means well, but by denouncing “Islamophobia” he shows he has accepted as sound a nonsense term that conflates faith and race and equates (well-founded) objections to Islam with prejudice against Muslims as people. And we should never forget that he, like Friedman, supported the Iraq War.


But what to make of Friedman and Kristof’s seemingly milquetoast colleague, David Brooks? No shame attaches to him, though by publishing his pro-faith columns, he validates a stupendously (if surreptitiously) baleful Weltanschauung that should long ago have disappeared from our world. Brooks, in the face of mounting evidence, has striven tirelessly to bequeath credence to the dangerous notion, ever more antiquated and morally untenable, that believing in something asserted without evidence – religion — constitutes a virtue. That valuing faith above reason makes one a better person. That those who have shrugged off – or laughed away – the comically outlandish claims advanced by the Abrahamic creeds about our world and origins as a species are the ones with the explaining to do. Should he not be called to account?

more at Salon

http://www.salon.com/2015/03/15/david_brooks_religious_clown_debunking_phony_godsplaining_from_the_new_york_times_laziest_columnist/



8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
David Brooks, religious clown: Debunking phony Godsplaining from the New York Times’ laziest columni (Original Post) Brainstormy Mar 2015 OP
The colossal ego of the faithful! AlbertCat Mar 2015 #1
More like christian privilege... rexcat Mar 2015 #3
Good point! Cartoonist Mar 2015 #5
Excellent piece--big rec. n/t. bvf Mar 2015 #2
Mr. Taylor scores a direct hit. Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #4
Atheism is bad because it doesn't lead to extremism? DetlefK Mar 2015 #6
The "Man Of Letters" strikes again... onager Mar 2015 #7
He thinks he is the driver of the Rethug clown car. kairos12 Mar 2015 #8
 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
1. The colossal ego of the faithful!
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 01:58 PM
Mar 2015

It's funny that they spew out all the great stuff religion is supposed to do, and which it has yet to actually come up with. Religion never pays off, because it's a fantasy... one that adults should shrug off after childhood.

I would never be so obnoxiously egotistical as to insist people do what I do to be happy. I will make a suggestion tho':


Free yourself from ancient superstitions! KNOW, that anything supernatural does not exist. KNOW that the only thing you have to fear in a graveyard at night is an open grave, or someone, REAL, hiding behind a tombstone. KNOW that no good or evil...thing... is fighting over your soul...which doesn't exist. Nothing supernatural is out to get you.... or help you.

Freeing oneself of prehistoric baggage is so enlightening! You can use all that time you're wasting in church and Sunday School to go to the museum, or listen to music.... y'know ART! is there for you! Why society should think art and music is some tacked on luxury no one should pay for and you give up when you grow up, instead of religion being the thing to marginalize, is beyond me.

Cartoonist

(7,320 posts)
5. Good point!
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 04:52 PM
Mar 2015
It's funny that they spew out all the great stuff religion is supposed to do, and which it has yet to actually come up with.
-

We have to wait until everyone on the planet belongs to the same religion for its prophecy to pass. I knew a guy who believed that all it would take is for the bible to be translated into every language on Earth.

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
6. Atheism is bad because it doesn't lead to extremism?
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 07:38 AM
Mar 2015

Quote:
"Brooks closes with what, to him, seems like a rousing call for “enchanted secularism” “that puts emotional relations first and autonomy second . . . . responsive to the spiritual urge in each of us, the drive for purity, self-transcendence and sanctification.”"

I read this as Brooks calling for atheists to develop emotional, over-the-top tenets that govern their thinking.

onager

(9,356 posts)
7. The "Man Of Letters" strikes again...
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 09:04 AM
Mar 2015

After wasting time and brain cells reading some of Brooks thru the years, I'm still amazed that he ever got a gig writing for the self-appointed "Paper of (Broken) Record." He's a humdrum writer and often incredibly clueless (as the OP shows).

Brooks clearly sees himself as the "Man Of Letters," lecturing us plebes from the solitude and comfort of his ivory tower where real life never intrudes.

Example that I'm still laughing about after several years - Brooks once compared Internet romances to the Victorian-era practice of sweethearts writing each other long, flowery love letters. And IIRC, predicted that all this Internet letter-writing would lead to more stable relationships IRL, etc. etc.

I think it was like, 1995 when I heard my first story about the Internet breaking up a marriage. But again, as the OP shows, Brooks is a master of ignoring any data that upsets his preconceived ideas.



Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»David Brooks, religious c...