Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
2. Smacks of chauvinism...
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 03:15 PM
Mar 2012

Any number of universes might be much more awesome.

Their gods might be laughing at our god's fuck-ups. It could happen.

--imm

 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
14. Have you never heard of "appropriate precautions?"
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 04:51 PM
Mar 2012
Always when visiting alternate universes!

If not just remotely, through protective filters, of course.

--imm
 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
3. The Awesomeness of the universe we live in. THAT is god.
Mon Mar 5, 2012, 12:45 PM
Mar 2012

Then why not just call it "the awesomeness of the universe we live in?" Why call it god?

Like the "god of the gaps". God is all the things we don't know.... the unknowable. Well, why not just call that "all the things we don't know"?


Besides, that's not what a god is, and you know it. A god is usually some entity that is basically a human with superpowers. A god does human things, like talk to people, make desicions, judges people and things... things the universe does not do.

It's like trying to make an obsolete concept relevant, all this redefining.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
4. Sorry, I was not trying to redefine anything.
Mon Mar 5, 2012, 03:59 PM
Mar 2012

I agree with every point you make. You are spot on. That's why I said in my OP that if I had to define god, that is what it is.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
9. That's why I said in my OP that if I had to define god, that is what it is.
Mon Mar 5, 2012, 09:27 PM
Mar 2012

Hmmmmm.... a subtle point.... but I get it.

If I had to define god, I'd say it was a delusion perpetrated by our propensity to anthropomorphize everything.... especially nature.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
10. Well, that is what I define most other peoples' verson as...
Mon Mar 5, 2012, 09:41 PM
Mar 2012

I think we are on the same page here, AC.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
5. The universe is not awesome. Your reaction to the universe is "awesome."
Mon Mar 5, 2012, 05:54 PM
Mar 2012

So your definition of god would be one's reaction to the universe we live in.

 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
12. I'm sorry, it's just that anything I'd define as "God" won't have diffraction spikes.
Mon Mar 5, 2012, 10:10 PM
Mar 2012

They're easy enough to eliminate and I'd like to think that a true god would at least try.

I dont have a problem with false color itself, just the way it looks in that image.

deucemagnet

(4,549 posts)
16. This is why I love this forum!
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 07:48 PM
Mar 2012

OP posts a generalized description of what his notion of god would be if he had to describe it.

Posters who reply with counter-arguments and/or snark: 6

Posters who reply, "Amen, brother!": 0

Ya gotta love A&A!

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»If I had to define "...